we already had those rights until the totalitarians and statists grew afraid of others who actually exercised those rights. where's the balance in that?
you keep trying to destroy their health care asshole
Read Row v. Wade, its a great lesson in balance of those two rights.
they just hate anyone who they can get social power over.
step on the weak to raise your self high.
its called socialism
52% of planned parenthood operating revenue comes from killing babies
restricting and reducing one right to provide for a limited right in another arena is hardly a balance between two rights. compromise does nothing but reduce an individuals freedom and places them further under governmental power.
The unenumerated right to basic freedom from unreasonable government intrusion into our personal medical decisions is not a limited right
False
Prove it is false. I proved it is correct in APP using Planned Parenthoods own annual report. So maybe you can prove otherwise?
I will understand if you can't.
this is absolutely impossible, based purely upon your stance of 'no right is absolute'. so maybe you should rethink your view on constitutional rights.
Where did you prove this?
I see your point. Its absolute in that it is a right, it is only limited when it conflicts with another absolute right.
I know that sounds like it is a fallacy because neither is absolute if its limited. The limits are a fiction the Courts create when confronted with the conflict of absolutes, because there is no other way to deal with such a situation.
you have repeatedly said that NO RIGHT IS ABSOLUTE! now, you're just tap dancing around your own trap of words. how can 'limits' be fiction if they are enforced upon individuals who are exercising said rights? how can absolutes conflict with other absolutes?
If I have an absolute right to freedom from government intervention in my health care choices, and my fetus has an absolute right to life, and I want an abortion.... don't those rights collide?
If I have an absolute right to freedom from government intervention in my health care choices, and my fetus has an absolute right to life, and I want an abortion.... don't those rights collide?
If I have an absolute right to practice my religion, and my kid has an absolute right to life...
If my religion says he cant have life saving medical treatment but he will die without it what happens?