In an ideal world abortion would a thing of the past, unfortunately it is still necessary. We have never had a similar debate over here, it has always been considered the lesser of two evils.
So it's ok to have unqualified practitioners now.
Is it OK to use coat hangers too ?
On the bright side costs should plunge now that medical standards are officially kaput.
The real moral vacuum is when a person thinks protecting unborn children, as opposed to killing them, is the threat.
the blastocysts don't even have brains. the fetus barely has one. they are less intelligent than frogs. probably on the scale of earthworms. We should encourage MORE abortions, we don't want poor trash babies born to poor irresponsible people. The less the better. Also keep in mind most richer people are much better are family planning, so more abortions = less poor people. Which is a very worthy endeavor. Not to mention if we harvest them we'd have a fuck ton of stem cells. If I were president I would start a program to where we artificially inseminated volunteers, and then pay them for part of the value of the harvested stem cells.
the blastocysts don't even have brains. the fetus barely has one. they are less intelligent than frogs. probably on the scale of earthworms. We should encourage MORE abortions, we don't want poor trash babies born to poor irresponsible people. The less the better. Also keep in mind most richer people are much better are family planning, so more abortions = less poor people. Which is a very worthy endeavor. Not to mention if we harvest them we'd have a fuck ton of stem cells. If I were president I would start a program to where we artificially inseminated volunteers, and then pay them for part of the value of the harvested stem cells.
the blastocysts don't even have brains. the fetus barely has one. they are less intelligent than frogs. probably on the scale of earthworms. We should encourage MORE abortions, we don't want poor trash babies born to poor irresponsible people. The less the better. Also keep in mind most richer people are much better are family planning, so more abortions = less poor people. Which is a very worthy endeavor. Not to mention if we harvest them we'd have a fuck ton of stem cells. If I were president I would start a program to where we artificially inseminated volunteers, and then pay them for part of the value of the harvested stem cells.
Yes, we've done an excellent job in creating a moral vacuum.
President Grind, now that's a scary prospect. Your first act would be to round up Boomers and Xers, you would make Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot look like boyscouts.
the blastocysts don't even have brains.
no blastocyst has ever been aborted.....learn some science for fuck's sake......
Undoubtedly Silly Pastor must be a scientist, oh wait! Typical harassing conservative.
In an ideal world abortion would a thing of the past, unfortunately it is still necessary. We have never had a similar debate over here, it has always been considered the lesser of two evils.
no blastocyst has ever been aborted.....learn some science for fuck's sake......
“A three-day-old human embryo is a collection of 150 cells called a blastocyst. There are, for the sake of comparison, more than 100,000 cells in the brain of a fly."
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/191185-a-three-day-old-human-embryo-is-a-collection-of-150-cells
Many religiously crazy pro lifers call plan B "the abortion pill"...pastor ass-pimple...
"Although Plan B could serve as a contraceptive, it could also serve as an abortifacient".
http://www.christianliferesources.com/article/the-abortion-pill-and-the-morning-after-pill-are-they-the-same-1023
annnnd score!
The real moral vacuum is when a person thinks protecting unborn children, as opposed to killing them, is the threat.
There is nothing in the constitution about abortion and so, by the tenth amendment, it is entirely a state issue. States need to say that.
Simply because a right is not enumerated does not mean it fails to exist!