Not if they understand teh ScIeNcE.
Apparently nobody knows who that woman is.
Not if they understand teh ScIeNcE.
This was a conservative opinion. It established no precedent about transgender rights that apply to any other court decisions and did not interfere with the decisions of schools on these issues.
Which bathroom should this freak use?
![]()
Which bathroom should this freak use?
![]()
Why do we gender bathrooms anyway? It would be so much simpler to make multiple smaller public restrooms that we don't have to share with anyone and then you wouldn't have to call somebody living their best life a "freak".
It's a question of cost and size.
Why do we gender bathrooms anyway? It would be so much simpler to make multiple smaller public restrooms that we don't have to share with anyone and then you wouldn't have to call somebody living their best life a "freak".
it would be much more expensive given the cost per square foot of construction.....
Then why were little bitches like yourself whining so hard?In a 7-2 decision Alito and Thomas were the only ones who disagreed, the Supreme Court agreed to let stand a decision allowing students to chose the bathroom they most identified with!
Trump appointments Kavanaugh, Goresuch and Barrett agreed.
I guess Trump was ineffective at making the Court more conservative.
Not really. Building a large room full of multiple toilets and sinks or building multiple smaller rooms with toilets and sinks are not that much of a cost difference, trust me, I studied architecture in college, it really doesn't cost all that much more to just add smaller, more private, restrooms and you can even cluster them, kind of like stalls, but better. They are slightly more expensive, but far more comfortable for women in particular.
Duh!! Because women get bent out of shape if the seat is left up.Why do we gender bathrooms anyway? It would be so much simpler to make multiple smaller public restrooms that we don't have to share with anyone and then you wouldn't have to call somebody living their best life a "freak".
Not nearly as much as you think, it is a design thing rather than an expense thing. "We've always done it" seems to be the norm as to the why. However, nowadays you will see the newer buildings are doing exactly as I noted and often they are building smaller and more private restrooms, instead of two they have like 4, sometimes also adding a "family" restroom which allows folks to utilize it without worrying about gender assignments.
Personally, comfort of customers would be worth the added cost, and it would avoid the controversy altogether.
Duh!! Because women get bent out of shape if the seat is left up.
Might as well, since nothing keeps anyone from using whatever bathroom they wanted in the first place. Not really something you could enforce even if it was unanimous against it.
Duh!! Because women get bent out of shape if the seat is left up.
have you forgotten what the bathrooms in high schools were like in that ten minute break between algebra and English lit?......
I almost never used the public restroom when I was in High School. That was a nasty place, best to be avoided at all costs.
you are definitely wrong.......men's public restrooms typically have one entrance, a half dozen urinals, four stalls and three sinks.......you would have to replace that with six entrances, six toilets and six sinks; on top of that it would require more square footage and considerably more complicated plumbing........and, since only six people could use them at a time you would slow down the process.....
In a 7-2 decision Alito and Thomas were the only ones who disagreed, the Supreme Court agreed to let stand a decision allowing students to chose the bathroom they most identified with!
Trump appointments Kavanaugh, Goresuch and Barrett agreed.
I guess Trump was ineffective at making the Court more conservative.