55% Oppose Tax Hike In Debt Ceiling Deal

Canceled2

Banned
Most American's KNOW that the only way to balance a budget is to curb spending-they know this because they have been doing it daily for the last 3 years themselves. The kind of spending cuts dems are proposing is phony! Spreading it out over 14 years is not equal to the "immediate cuts" necessary.
_________________________________________________________________


As the Beltway politicians try to figure out how they will raise the debt ceiling and for how long, most voters oppose including tax hikes in the deal.

Just 34% think a tax hike should be included in any legislation to raise the debt ceiling. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 55% disagree and say it should not. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

There is a huge partisan divide on the question. Fifty-eight percent (58%) of Democrats want a tax hike in the deal while 82% of Republicans do not. Among those not affiliated with either major political party, 35% favor a tax hike and 51% are opposed.

Americans who earn more than $75,000 a year are evenly divided as to whether a tax hike should be included in the debt ceiling deal. Those who earn less are opposed to including tax hikes.

Voters remain very concerned about the debt ceiling issue. Sixty-nine percent (69%) believe that it would be bad for the economy if a failure to raise the debt ceiling led to government defaults. Only 6% believe it would be good for theeconomy. Fourteen percent (14%) believe it would have no impact and 11% are notsure. These figures are little changed from a few weeks ago.

At the same time, however, 52% believe it would beeven more dangerous to raise the debt ceiling without making significant cuts in government spending. Thirty-seven percent (37%) take the opposite view and believe a government default would be more dangerous.

link
 
Of course most people oppose it.

But the $64 question is does that matter any more? When was the last time any politician, from either party, acted in the best interest of the people?
 
Of course most people oppose it.

But the $64 question is does that matter any more? When was the last time any politician, from either party, acted in the best interest of the people?

I think the first question is "what do these results mean?" I oppose tax hikes in debt ceiling legislation.
 
The devil is in the details...


The majority oppose "tax hikes".
The majority also support "increasing the tax rate on those making over $250,000 a year".

When people take the time to listen to the Presidents proposal, beyond the headline they support it.
 
Of course most people oppose it.

But the $64 question is does that matter any more? When was the last time any politician, from either party, acted in the best interest of the people?

It matters that we have a media who is playing this thing to the presidents favor and that the American public are no longer listened to. That the political class are so protected by our media that they no longer have an ear for those who gave them their jobs-but instead feel bolstered by media clanging. We have lost a truly free press (free from opinion). Rare is the hard news political story that isn't flavored with opinion.
 
The devil is in the details...


The majority oppose "tax hikes".
The majority also support "increasing the tax rate on those making over $250,000 a year".

When people take the time to listen to the Presidents proposal, beyond the headline they support it.

The questions

1* How closely have you followed news stories about the raising the debt ceiling?

2* As part of legislation to raise the debt ceiling, should congress and the president raise taxes?

3* How would you rate the way President Obama has handled the debt ceiling issue….excellent, good, fair or poor?

4* If the debt ceiling is not raised, the federal government will default on some of its loan obligations because it will not be able to make interest payments on the federal debt. If the government defaults on its debt, would that be good for the economy, bad for the economy, or have no impact on the economy?

5* Which is more dangerous in the short-term: the government defaulting on the federal debt or the failure to significantly cut government spending?

NOTE: Margin of Sampling Error, +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence
 
It matters that we have a media who is playing this thing to the presidents favor and that the American public are no longer listened to. That the political class are so protected by our media that they no longer have an ear for those who gave them their jobs-but instead feel bolstered by media clanging. We have lost a truly free press (free from opinion). Rare is the hard news political story that isn't flavored with opinion.

how true this is. unfortunately, you have the base constituency of each side clamoring to hear more just like it. The only real indpendent news sources are ignored because the biased claim the independents are biased, when it paints their ideology in a negative light.

i think i'll buy more guns and ammo. armageddon is coming.
 
Um:

srxuqqm8qkax643rbt9k-w.gif



Obama's proposal is mostly spending cuts. The Republican proposal is only spending cuts. Obama's proposal is more popular.
 
Back
Top