Into the Night
Verified User
No emails.
No bank records.
No quid pro quo.
No $20 million
Jeopardy theme still playing.
Blatant lies.
No emails.
No bank records.
No quid pro quo.
No $20 million
Jeopardy theme still playing.
Indeed but I keep trying.
Nordy is a difficult student but I am making progress...slowly for sure.
We can start out very slowly on this, Trumptards. With just ONE of those claims you’re making. I’ll pick.
Let’s see the bank records. I dunno. The $20 million. The $5 million. I don’t give a fuck what the amount you morons are claiming these days. Even ONE bank record.
Jeopardy theme starting again.
ROFLMAO.
You don't seem to know what a fact is.
The House committee has found no evidence of any money going to Joe Biden from Hunter's businesses.
well yes, when her campaign started the "Russian collusion" hoax it was an attempt to win an election by fraud......but to be fair, she hid her classified documents in a closet in Colorado on a hard drive not in a bathroom......(by the way, she was never a president so she could never have declassified them)......Did she try to overturn an election using fraud?
Did she intentionally have thousands of classified documents in her bathroom?
Impeachment is a "nothing burger?"
Any Trumpfucker has no grounds to talk about integrity.
Jeopardy theme still playing….
You Nazis have no integrity - that's a fact.
We've seen you in this thread be presented a fact and instantly lie about it.
I think you drones are mentally ill - that you truly believe the definition of "truth" is "any utterance that serves the Reich."
Seriously, look at you - you blatantly lie when the facts are staring us all in the face. Because ONLY your Reich matters to you. You will say or do literally anything to further the goal of absolute power for the Oligarchy you serve.
You're like English Bob from Unforgiven - you lie with more ease than Americans draw breath.
Let’s try this again, dimwit.
The issue is JOE BIDEN, not anybody else. Not a family member. Not an associate.
The other issue is not what that idiot, Comer, has to say. It’s the fucking BANK RECORD.
Swing and a miss for you. Again. Still.
Other that selling influence via Joke, what did the Biden family bring to the world of international politics and finance?
The issue is JOE BIDEN and his alleged criminal activity, Rufus. So far, you Trumpers have nothing. Zilch. Zero. Nada.
Just the same fucking squawking points.
No bank records.
No $20 million
No quid pro quo.
NOTHING
Actually, they have quite a bit. It has already been demonstrated that Joke was lying his ass off that he had nothing to do with his son's business dealings whatsoever. That's been proven 100% wrong. Joke knew what his son was doing and met repeatedly with his son and his son's business partners and associates. There is no doubt about that.
There is zero doubt that Bagman and his business partners were paid millions by those same associates.
The ONLY thing not fully proven, yet, is to what extent Joke himself made money off those dealings.
That point is likely to have solid evidence within the next six (6) months. Once there is, Joke is finished.
There are bank records, and they are being collected.
There was millions that flowed into a variety of Bagman owned shell corporations
There likely was quid pro quo. The clearest example is the firing of the Ukranian prosecutor. The only missing link in that particular one is how the payment for it was made. It's known that Bursima execs talked to Bagman about getting the prosecutor fired. It's known that Bagman at least peripherally talked to his father about it. It's known that Bursima gave Bagman a paid position after it happened, and made payments through a corrupt Malta bank known for its money laundering. We know that the prosecutor was replaced by a thoroughly corrupt, incompetent, unqualified person too.
It's you that has nothing but ad hominem and bullshit to respond to all that with.
Actually, they have quite a bit. It has already been demonstrated that Joke was lying his ass off that he had nothing to do with his son's business dealings whatsoever. That's been proven 100% wrong. Joke knew what his son was doing and met repeatedly with his son and his son's business partners and associates. There is no doubt about that.
There is zero doubt that Bagman and his business partners were paid millions by those same associates.
The ONLY thing not fully proven, yet, is to what extent Joke himself made money off those dealings.
That point is likely to have solid evidence within the next six (6) months. Once there is, Joke is finished.
There are bank records, and they are being collected.
There was millions that flowed into a variety of Bagman owned shell corporations
There likely was quid pro quo. The clearest example is the firing of the Ukranian prosecutor. The only missing link in that particular one is how the payment for it was made. It's known that Bursima execs talked to Bagman about getting the prosecutor fired. It's known that Bagman at least peripherally talked to his father about it. It's known that Bursima gave Bagman a paid position after it happened, and made payments through a corrupt Malta bank known for its money laundering. We know that the prosecutor was replaced by a thoroughly corrupt, incompetent, unqualified person too.
It's you that has nothing but ad hominem and bullshit to respond to all that with.
None of that has been proven. Oh, now it is 6 months. Then it will be another 6. Then the Krakens faiult. You guys are pavovian. They ring a bell and you drool, then bleed from your eyes and your whtevers.
The firing of the Ukranian prosecutor has been covered ad nauseam, dimwit. Give it up. It was Burisma’s loss that he was fired.
When your “likely” bullshit turns into real evidence rather than your lies, bullshit and unfounded accusations, then there’s room for discussion.
Until then, you just regurgitated more suppositional bullshit. At least you’re consistent.
All of what I've stated is fact. There's a mountain of evidence backing it up. The only piece of the puzzle not in place is how deep Joke was actually into it, not whether or not he was.
Who replaced him? What had to happen to allow his replacement to serve as Ukraine's chief prosecutor?