50 years of failed eco predictions

Okay... you asked:
* disband the EPA.
* disband the NEA.
* disband the BATF.
* Wind down the Social Security system...to eventually disband it.
* disband the CPSC
* disband the DHS.
* disband the DEA.
* disband most of NASA (satellite tracking and airfoil standards tracking are still useful).
* reorganize the military to reduce waste and improve response.

OK, so you do all that and you're still looking at a trillion dollar deficit.

So you need to go back to the drawing board.
 
Wrong. Government spending ain't free.

Exactly...which is why you need to make up for spending cuts elsewhere.

You used to say that tax cuts would lead to increased economic activity, but that has been disproved by the last 40 years of empirical economic data.

So since cutting taxes doesn't result in more consumer spending, what is their purpose?

You argue that every dollar the government spends could be a dollar the private sector spends instead, right?

So if you cut government spending on bridge repair, from where are you getting the money to fix the bridge, or WHO is fixing the bridge? It's not Apple...
 
There has never been a government surplus in over 70 years.

Incorrect...we had budget surpluses from 1998-2001 that your guy, Bush the Dumber, said were indicative of people being over-taxed.

So when we run a surplus, you say it's bad.

So when we run a deficit, you say it's bad.

It's clear that you don't know what you're talking about.
 
There has not been a government surplus in over 70 years.

Repeating this mantra doesn't make it true.

Of course there were surpluses...Bush even acknowledged them in his 2000 campaign: "What's risky is overtaxing people and leaving unspent money in Washington,".



No, I'm not...you're just a really stupid person.


Not imaginary. You are calling for communism.

Only if you don't know what communism is or means.
 
A type of business structure that operates under a constitution, usually known as the corporate charter or corporate contract. Shares in the contract are distributed among usually two or more owners. Not all businesses are corporations.

Right, but every single one of them requires a charter from the state to conduct business in the country.
 
Anyone can play the game of capitalism. All it takes is initiative and work.

Incredibly naïve and juvenile.

This is why CRT upsets you so much...you belief in the myth of capitalism and American exceptionalism. Because your "hard work" and "initiative" was already made easy for you by virtue of your race and gender. So you didn't achieve what you achieved through work and initiative, you coasted by on a system that was designed to help you succeed at the expense of others.

That's not something to brag about, you know...
 
Create it.

You can't create capital out of thin air.

Do you think every new business starts out with cash? No. They all start out with loans and in debt. Most of them don't ever come out of it.


Successful businessmen are successful because they produce products or services that people want to buy.

No, they're not. They don't produce SHIT. Their workers do, they do not. And their workers only produce to meet demand.

This is precisely why Conservative economies always, always, always fail...Conservatives just have no economic intelligence or experience.


You are advocating communism as 'economy'

How am I doing that?

Government spends in the same economy as you and I do...they do not have a separate, shadow economy that they spend in.
 
They all produce products or services that people want to buy. That's how you make a profit. Borrowing is a liability. Sales are cash...an asset.

I hope what you said about running a business isn't true because my God, you are a complete and total moron when it comes to economics, business, and finance.

Almost every single business starts out in debt...the ones that don't are the ones where kids get an inheritance from their parents and then use that inheritance or gift to build their business.

This is why half of all businesses fail...none of you know what the fuck you're doing.
 
No, capitalism is.

Capitalism caused the latest recession, which started in February 2020, before COVID.

And then Capitalism needed a trillion dollar PPP bailout.

And that was 10 years after Capitalism needed another trillion dollar bailout and discount Fed window.

If Capitalism "worked", it wouldn't need a bailout every 5-10 years.


Reversal fallacy.

That's not even a real fallacy, and you're just spinning your wheels now, trying to dream up ways to avoid answering for every stupid thing you believe.
 
Back
Top