2nd Amendment outside the home

[Billy the Great Khan]

Since I'm not "legion", I have a point. You're lying.

Oh but you are. Legion is the colloquial name for a troll long established on this board who antagonizes several posters, rarely ever commits to serious debate, and always posts behind a proxy. That's you. If the facts are hurtful to you, perhaps you should try and not be a troll. It's never too late to stop you know.

It's not an objective of American law? Cite your source. Since the second amendment takes precedence over all other gun control laws, that's moot. Maybe you should pick another fight.

I shouldn't need to cite common sense. The vast majority of our criminal laws punish acts, they are not in place to prevent them. And as far as the 2A is concerned it would be more accurate to say that it invalidates all gun control laws, with the possible exception of requiring background checks by licensed federal dealers.

So my picture of a cigar-smoking guy in a Klansman outfit, posted as a sarcastic response to Schadenfreude's question, hurt your feelings? I can live with that.

So you were trolling. Cool story bro.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Oh but you are. Legion is the colloquial name for a troll long established on this board who antagonizes several posters, rarely ever commits to serious debate, and always posts behind a proxy. That's you. If the facts are hurtful to you, perhaps you should try and not be a troll. It's never too late to stop you know.

Yeah, like you know what ISP I use and stuff. Keep up the good work, idiot. If I'd just agree to agree with you and your pals every time....LOL.

I shouldn't need to cite common sense. The vast majority of our criminal laws punish acts, they are not in place to prevent them.

You should need to back up what you said. That you can't is obvious - to anyone with common sense.

And as far as the 2A is concerned it would be more accurate to say that it invalidates all gun control laws, with the possible exception of requiring background checks by licensed federal dealers.

So we agree on one point.

So you were trolling. Cool story bro.

The old standbys are the best, aren't they?

Cheers!

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Yeah, like you know what ISP I use and stuff. Keep up the good work, idiot. If I'd just agree to agree with you and your pals every time....LOL.



You should need to back up what you said. That you can't is obvious - to anyone with common sense.

And as far as the 2A is concerned it would be more accurate to say that it invalidates all gun control laws, with the possible exception of requiring background checks by licensed federal dealers.

So we agree on one point.



The old standbys are the best, aren't they?

Cheers!

why is poor legion so butt hurt

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Um, you're apparently drunk again.

The purpose of legal punishment is deterrence, unless you think the law can cause time travel.

Since laws can't absolutely deter future behaviors by punishing past transgressors, they should be eliminated, right?

Bottoms up!

actually....our justice system is about both punishment and deterrence. the punishment plays a dual role, that of strictly punishment for the offender and a deterrence to others who might consider acting in similar fashion.

you're welcome.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

maryland just got totally and comletely body slammed in this reply brief for cert to the supreme court.

http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/WilliamsReplyBrief.pdf

 

[Billy the Great Khan]

That's about as big a bitch slap as a legal body can provide.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

as i see it, this case will not only decide about the right outside the home but it should also dismiss a permit out of hand, or at the very least force states to accept open carry without a permit.

 

[Rune]

as i see it, this case will not only decide about the right outside the home but it should also dismiss a permit out of hand, or at the very least force states to accept open carry without a permit.

Shoot for the moon I guess.

 

[Bonestorm]

as i see it, this case will not only decide about the right outside the home but it should also dismiss a permit out of hand, or at the very least force states to accept open carry without a permit.

I don't see how a decision that says permitting statues are unconstitutional is consistent with the McDonald decision, but that's just me.

 

[Billy the Great Khan]

I don't see how a decision that says permitting statues are unconstitutional is consistent with the McDonald decision, but that's just me.

It's likely to say shall issue is allowed but may issue permits are not, as they are not universal to the people. So Marylands permitting structure won't be allowed, but MIs will.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I don't see how a decision that says permitting statues are unconstitutional is consistent with the McDonald decision, but that's just me.

the mcdonald decisions application to the states provided strict scrutiny to the right to possess a weapon, hence having a statute permitting a right will be unconstitutional.