TOP
Retired Teacher
Indeed you should... Many saw...We shall... Patiently...
2000 Mules
- Thread starter ExpressLane
- Start date
No one is saying it isn't a right
Do you want a bunch of idiots protesting in your neighborhood?
That's what's happening in the Justice's neighborhoods. It is harassment,
and it's against the law. But like some other "rules," you give them a pass too.
Id probably join them depending on the protest
TOP
Retired Teacher
Very hopefully...
I like you, RB, I think you know that. I would love to have a beer or two with you...and laugh about things that guys laugh about while bullshitting. I understand that you are sincere in your thoughts that progressives want to destroy our nation...and I am every bit as sincere in my thoughts that American conservatives are, whether intentionally or accidentally, attempting to destroy it.
There is no way to resolve our differences that I can see. I suspect another civil war of some kind will have to be fought...where you will root for and applaud people trying to kill people like me...and, unfortunately, I will root for and applaud people trying to kill people like you. I also think that will happen during our lifetimes...AND I AM NOW 85...so...
That is pitiful...and I am filled with pity for our nation and the people in it.
Id probably join them depending on the protest
I'm sure you would, even if it became unruly in someone else's neighborhood. But not in your own, huh?
"WTF?" is a question for "2,000 Mules", title to this thread and the witless arguments behind it, like "WTF?"
No, I’d probably join them, but I’m not sure why they’d protest in my neighborhood of retired old farts, the average age on my street is probably 65.
I don't drink, haven't for 16 years, but I might make an exception for a beer or two (I did break down for a few shots of Crown Royal with my friends for my birthday) with you.
My hopes are that it doesn't come to a civil war. If it does though, I am prepared.
Again. my hopes are this nation can come together like we did on 9-11, without any loss of life.
I think protests are silly, but they are a constitutional right. Harassment of Supreme Court Justices (trying to change an opinion that was illegally released) is NOT a right. Don't ever forget that.
Protests are a protected right, calling them harassment doesn’t make it so.
It is illegal to harass a Supreme Court Justice in the attempt to intimidate them and change their decision.
TOP
Retired Teacher
It certainly is...how can some be so blind to the obvious?
But it DOES NOT have to be that way Frank. It just doesnt. In the past what made this country great was people discussing their hopes and dreams for the country, their differences, then being honest enuff to open up to each other and and drop the partisan bullshit. No side has ever been 100 % correct. People need to admit that each side has valid points instead of this MY TEAM is always right BULLSHIT,....because it is not! Cable news, print, and as much as I hate to say it places like THIS ONE have helped cause this divide. So,....what do we want as a country? Do we want to just kill each other simply because we have ALL become so corrupt that we refuse to be honest enuff to admit that both sides have some valid concerns? Or are we going to do the right thing and begin to be honest again for a change? There are not TWO TEAMS in this country like the powers that be would have us believe. Its a damn LIE and people need to wake the F up and smell the coffee before its too late.
I feel that my side is generally correct on most issues,....Frank feels his side is generally correct on most issues. But that does not mean that there isnt a whole lot that both sides also get wrong,...because there surely is. In addition,....there also also a whole lot of grey area's. Maybe that might be the best place to start.......WHY do we have to support things that we all know damn well are WRONG just because " the party" says so? In plain English......FUCK THE PARTY! The people control the party,....not the other way around.
Posts like the above are why people and publications get sued. There is no record (after months of searching for it) of Coomer saying what he is quoted as saying, just as there is no proof 400,000 American voters in a handful of states had their absentee ballots cast in a manner that rendered them unlawful, or even an explanation for how and why that would have occurred.
Not proof, not evidence:
1. That the ballots are not being delivered in an authorized fashion; not even proof the things are ballots.
2. That the man taking the picture is doing it in order to get paid rather than to document he did what was lawfully entrusted to him to do.
3. That the DNC was involved.
4. That ten or so ballots equates to 400,000 ballots.
5. That the ballots were not Trump ballots.