2000 : Hillary Said She Won't Use Email Because They Can Be Found By Investigagators

anatta said:
do you need to source it?? How about you trying some research for yourself for once in your life?

Here's how that works:
You say I am making a wrong assertion ,and you present a counter argument, which you support by links.
See if you can connect any dots.
Click to expand...

Hey idiot: typing real slow just for you.
I don't trust you.
That is all.
Nothing to research.
You are hyper-partisan yet you tell yourself you are mid stream. (Not self aware)
You hate females, especially those in power. (Misogynistic)
You are racist trash but don't know it. (ignorant)
You make accusations and pretend they are facts (self-deluded)
You speak from the mantle of expert yet your general fund of knowledge is very small (arogant)
You are not credible (dishonest).

You tell others to research but have you ever researched The Starr investigation?
I have mentioned it to you at least 100 times.
 
anatta said:
it's a solid site. I've used it for Libya. It's an aggregate site that gathers ,and writes editorials. feel free to refute any of it.

I stay away from dailly caller, and Brietbart for the most part. Unfortunately every news site is biased -
including the NYTimes and WaPo
Click to expand...

Bullshit you fucking retard.
A solid site reports facts and doesn't call contributions to charities "bribes".
You are hopelessly outclassed on this site. (JPP)
 
Rune said:
Hey idiot: typing real slow just for you.
I don't trust you.
That is all.
Nothing to research.
You are hyper-partisan yet you tell yourself you are mid stream. (Not self aware)
You hate females, especially those in power. (Misogynistic)
You are racist trash but don't know it. (ignorant)
You make accusations and pretend they are facts (self-deluded)
You speak from the mantle of expert yet your general fund of knowledge is very small (arogant)
You are not credible (dishonest).

You tell others to research but have you ever researched The Starr investigation?
I have mentioned it to you at least 100 times.
Click to expand...
if I made characterizations about the Starr investigation I would. I am familiar with it as much as any lay person.
But I do not make remarks that I will not back up - or research if not clear..
Other then that WTF do I care about it? It's way old news like the "vast RW conspiracy"

You are forever dumb when it comes to her Emails/Libya/aspects of the Clinton foundation ( and I don't know them all either)
Syria/the Russian reset/ the "new cold war"..and damn near anything else you comment on with your clam baked brain..

The rest of this screed is your problem.. as in literally Go Screw Yourself into the ground for all I care.
You have nothing to contribute but whining ad homs.

Tell it to Darla or someone else that gives a fuck..
 
Rune said:
This is retarded even for you.
No one in the history of US pilitics has been investigated more thoroughly than Hillary.
What unbelievable ignorance you suffer from.
Click to expand...

And there were perfectly legitimate reasons for all those investigations....her machine is better than any organized crime group in the world.....she's beat them every time.
 
Rune said:
Bullshit you fucking retard.
A solid site reports facts and doesn't call contributions to charities "bribes".
You are hopelessly outclassed on this site. (JPP)
Click to expand...
it references "international anti-bribery" standards..
JFC you see a shiny object in a word/phrase and get completely distracted.....eediot.
 
anatta said:
if I made characterizations about the Starr investigation I would. I am familiar with it as much as any lay person.
But I do not make remarks that I will not back up - or research if not clear..
Other then that WTF do I care about it? It's way old news like the "vast RW conspiracy"

You are forever dumb when it comes to her Emails/Libya/aspects of the Clinton foundation ( and I don't know them all either)
Syria/the Russian reset/ the "new cold war"..and damn near anything else you comment on with your clam baked brain..

The rest of this screed is your problem.. as in literally Go Screw Yourself into the ground for all I care.
You have nothing to contribute but whining ad homs.

Tell it to Darla or someone else that gives a fuck..
Click to expand...

Darla is pretty much al of those but that doesn't seem to bother him!
 
Jarod said:
You have some evidence she lied about the 30 thousand emails? If you look you will see she did not lie about them and was perfectly entitled to erase them.
Click to expand...

Well I could very well ask why she was using the same email address for personal and government related emails.
 
Last edited:
anatta said:
it references "international anti-bribery" standards..
JFC you see a shiny object in a word/phrase and get completely distracted.....eediot.
Click to expand...

Wrong.
It directly calls donations to the Clinton Foundation bribes.
Again, I suggest Reading Comprehension 101.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top