Think so?
1AM - Mueller team wrote for PUBLIC release. Actual evidence "alarming & significant"
- Thread starter Centerleftfl
- Start date
Think so?
reagansghost
eternal
Trump convinced his chumps Collusiongate was over lol
not quite!
not quite!
Are you a criminal, the laws and J/D policies and rules pertaining to the release of the Mueller Report must be followed. It's the LAW.
I love liberal predictions.
Where did Barr say that asshat? Clear Trump of what? Have charges been filed against Trump? How does one need "clearing" when they haven't even been charged.
If you morons had a brain, these are the OBVIOUS questions leading one to surmise that this entire episode is a massive fraud perpetrated by dark players in the Government and previous administration with the media as willing accomplices.
It is an outrage and incredible abuse of justice unprecedented in the history of this once great republic which you idiots on the left want to turn into a Fascistic third world shit hole. I do not believe that a majority of the American public wish to continue down the rabbit hole the Democratic Party of the Jackass is heading.
No collusion, no proof of obstruction.
Now, have a tissue and some hot chocolate.
Last edited:
Are you stupid? LOL!
The moron is strong in this snowflake. 
Wildfire? You are dumber than a box of rocks. The Party of the Jackass is burning down their own house.
Worth a mention, WAPO didn't put this under National or Politics, they put it under National Security. That's interesting. BARR IS FUCKING WITH THE REPORT AND US!
These are some very salient 'pullouts' from the article, further down. The team WROTE IT FOR RELEASE, already 'redacted' or requiring minimum more editing.
The report was prepared “so that the front matter from each section could have
been released immediately — or very quickly,” the official said. “It was done in a way
that minimum redactions, if any, would have been necessary, and the work would have spoken for itself.”
Mueller’s team assumed the information was going to be made available to the public,Limited information Barr has shared about Russia investigation frustrated some on Mueller’s team
the official said, “and so they prepared their summaries to be shared in their own words
— and not in the attorney general’s summary of their work, as turned out to be the case.”
By Ellen Nakashima , Carol D. Leonnig and Rosalind S. Helderman
April 4 at 1:01 AM
Members of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s team have told associates they are frustrated with the limited information Attorney General William P. Barr has provided about their nearly two-year investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether President Trump sought to obstruct justice, according to people familiar with the matter.
The displeasure among some who worked on the closely held inquiry has quietly begun to surface in the days since Barr released a four-page letter to Congress on March 24 describing what he said were the principal conclusions of Mueller’s still-confidential, 400-page report.
In his letter, Barr said that the special counsel did not establish a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. And he said that Mueller did not reach a conclusion “one way or the other” as to whether Trump’s conduct in office constituted obstruction of justice.
Absent that, Barr told lawmakers that he concluded the evidence was not sufficient to prove that the president obstructed justice.
But members of Mueller’s team have complained to close associates that the evidence they gathered on obstruction was alarming and significant.
“It was much more acute than Barr suggested,” said one person, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the subject’s sensitivity.
Attorney General William P. Barr has promised to provide Congress with a
redacted version of Mueller’s report by mid-April. (Erik S Lesser/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock)
The New York Times first reported that some special counsel investigators feel that Barr did not adequately portray their findings.
Some members of the office were particularly disappointed that Barr did not release summary information the special counsel team had prepared, according to two people familiar with their reactions.
“There was immediate displeasure from the team “There was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work instead,” according one U.S. official briefed on the matter...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...2f46684196e_story.html?utm_term=.e182ad0cabfb
Duh! Homer. The freaking President of the United States is being investigated and IT SHOULD NOT BE COVERED UNDER THE UMBRELLA OF "NATIONAL SECURITY"? What idiots.
FYI: It is the AG of the United States that gets to DECIDE.....not the Special Investigator, not members of the investigating team, their duty is to present the evidence without prejudice.....if "PROSECUTION" and "INDICTMENT" was recommended it would be inclusive in the report with the evidence that supported that recommendation. The report declared there would be no more indictments forthcoming as there was a lack of evidence that could not validate the justice systems prerequisite of being beyond "REASONABLE DOUBT". Game over.....these 9 DNC hit men can bloviate to hell and back in the halls of congress and its still the AG that determines the disposition of the case based upon the evidence provided.
If they wanted a conviction perhaps they should have fabricated more evidence..... Not make up crimes that do not exist under the US JUSTICE SYSTEM AND ATTEMPT TO PROSECUTE by process instead of evidence. It was Wiseman that has a history of making up crimes to charge people....and this time the made up crime of Obstruction of a crime that was never proven to exist, COLUSION...simply did not work with this AG.
Last edited:
Same lies they have used the last two years to arrive at the Mueller nothing burger. They lack the IQ to learn and overcome their hatred.
The House can vote to override that prohibition.
Fun fact - After Kenneth W. Starr, the independent counsel who investigated Clinton, delivered his report in September 1998, Nadler immediately rejected calls from Republicans to make the entire thing public.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-nadler-wants-full-mueller-report-but-opposed-release-of-starr-report/2019/04/02/47009d98-5547-11e9-9136-f8e636f1f6df_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f4560bc6be2d
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
Theyre scared as fuck. Many should go to jail for this hoax.
It seems to me the ones trying to keep it secret are the ones who are scared...
Excellent. Whooda thunk it? Rosenweasel actually came in handy.