1AM - Mueller team wrote for PUBLIC release. Actual evidence "alarming & significant"
- Thread starter Centerleftfl
- Start date
Bingo..they had it bad for Trump - they wanted more slime, damn the lack of evidence for "bad acts"
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello anatta,
This is not right for us to be asked to trust somebody hand-picked by the suspect of a crime to decide what evidence to released.
The right would not be complacent if it was about President Hillary.
You can't expect the left to just say OK. That's not how America works. For once, you need to think outside your little right box.
This is not right for us to be asked to trust somebody hand-picked by the suspect of a crime to decide what evidence to released.
The right would not be complacent if it was about President Hillary.
You can't expect the left to just say OK. That's not how America works. For once, you need to think outside your little right box.
You are ignoring that it would be easy to release the report without violating the "Grand Jury law" because there is a provision that says all you have to do is ask a Judge permission and it can be released. Congressmen have asked Barr to join them in requesting a judge grant permission and he has refused. Additionally, Barr himself has said he will be redacting much more than Grand Jury information.
You are a limp dick Rump apologist.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
reagansghost
eternal
yup, definitely disqualifies Barr form the entire instigation into obstruction, obviously couln't be more biased
he clearly should have recused himself immediately after his pal Trump hired him
keep swinging at the fences comrade!
No one is asking you to trust anyone, Snowflake. You will be forced to respect the US Code and rules and policies of the J/D pertaining to the release of Mueller's report.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Jarod,
Well, there is certainly evidence of campaign finance violation.
Sworn testimony and a check.
We already know about that.
If the known is already up to the level of criminal activity, we have to ask what is the unknown?
Show US The Report!
Well, there is certainly evidence of campaign finance violation.
Sworn testimony and a check.
We already know about that.
If the known is already up to the level of criminal activity, we have to ask what is the unknown?
Show US The Report!
ridiculous. there is Rosenweasel and there are DoJ top officials. what you should be worrying about is there was insufficient evidence to indict ( per Mullet)- but it appear Mullet still referred it to DoJ
If you really want more reasoning, then bring in Mullet to testify, and quit trying to get underling docs and grand jury testimony
You are ignoring this:
"The regulations require Barr to notify the top Republicans and Democrats on the House of Representatives and Senate Judiciary Committees that the investigation has ended. Department policy calls for Barr to summarize the confidential report for Congress with “an outline of the actions and the reasons for them.” According to the regulations, Barr “may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions.”
In deciding what to release, Barr may have to confront thorny legal issues involving secrecy of grand jury testimony, protecting classified information, communications with the White House possibly subject to the principle of executive privilege shielding certain information from disclosure, and safeguarding confidential reasons for why some individuals were not charged. "
Now, take a hike, pende*o.
You have to stop watching CNN. Particularly Cuomo's laughably stupid program. So let me get this new farcical narrative down; Barr is so stupid that he is willing to LIE about what is in the report with the belief that it will NEVER see the light of day? That Mueller would permit him to falsify his findings without hitting the talk show circuit?
I know you fall for such moronic stupidity because you lack the intelligence to be skeptical, OR, you simply wish to believe these unbelievable claims because of your severe case of Butt Hurt and misplaced hate for Trump.
It's gullible, willing dunces like you that make the media so despicable in my point of view. Having been thoroughly embarrassed by Trumps win, the media has made it their shtick to divide this nation and instill a hatred for this President of historic proportions.
This makes sane people like me even more determined to ensure that Trump gets re-elected. It will take that, and more, to send the message to our media elites and the dark forces within the Federal Government bureaucracy that we don't like what they are doing and it needs to stop.
This new LOW level liberals and the Party of the Jackass is willing to stoop to does not serve this nation or it's people. It sets a new low life precedent that will continue to divide and destroy this nation from the inside out. You aren't winning; you're turning all of us into losers.
No wonder you're such a low information buffoon. PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello anatta,
If you can't even get their names correct what else are you mistaken about?
If you can't even get their names correct what else are you mistaken about?
No, there is NO evidence of Campaign Finance violations. Writing a check in an effort to protect ones family in NO way involves campaign finance violations. Get a clue.
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
which mueller team members? sounds like more bullshit.
why don't you dems regroup, forget collusion, and come up with a vision for the country.
why don't you dems regroup, forget collusion, and come up with a vision for the country.
Barr could and would legally release the entire report next week if Trump publicly asked him to do so. If the report exonerated Trump, no question he would not only ask, he would demand.
If you can't properly punctuate a dependent clause followed by an independent clause, what else are you mistaken about?
Then there's this:
DEMOCRAT presidential candidate Francis O’Rourke paid roughly $110,000 in campaign funds to a web development company while he and his wife owned it, public records show.
"Beto for Texas" paid Stanton Street Technology Group $58,544 during the 2011-12 election cycle, $39,060 during the 2013-14 cycle, $9,290 in the 2015-16 cycle and $32,778 during the 2017-18 cycle, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) records.
O’Rourke and his wife owned Stanton Street — a small web development firm that O’Rourke founded in 1998.
http://tinyurl.com/Beto-beats-off
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
that's all the proof your stupid little brain needs, I guess.