19 Republi'can' AG's try to assert States OWN women's bodies!

QP!

Verified User
A State CAN criminalize an activity in the State, whether the citizens agree with the law or not. You will break the law in that State, if you then do it.

A State CANNOT criminalize an activity you might do in another State, when it is LEGAL to do it there, Your State may not allow gambling but when in Vegas you are not breaking the law, as it is legal there.


That is a foundational premise of the law as the State does not OWN you, and you are not the State's possession, so they cannot tell you what you can and cannot do in OTHER jurisdictions where the activity is LEGAL. It is not enough for the State to say 'It is illegal to do here (the activity is prohibited in THIS jurisdiction) therefore you the CITIZEN cannot do it anywhere.

They assert control of their jurisdiction but not you specifically, so it is only when you break that law in THEIR jurisdiction you then break the law. That is core to law. It is jurisdiction dependent and NOT citizen dependant, no matter where they are. It is out of season to fish Salmon where you are and you will break the law to fish it, but in season in another State, you are free to go as the law does not apply to you, the citizen, it applies to the jurisdiction.


Now Republi'can' AG's across the country are trying to get control of the Citizen and not just have control of the State and the Law.

So if you gamble in Vegas (have an abortion out of State) they want to say that even though it was legal there, the law applies to your body no matter the jurisdiction as the State has jurisdiction over your body even as it travels. No matter where it travels.

19 Republican Attorneys General Want Police to Investigate People for Abortions

...Roger Severino, a former Trump administration HHS official now at the Heritage Foundation, made conservative aims even more explicit. “If someone says, ‘I’m going to kill myself’ or ‘I’m going to kill somebody else,’ medical providers are allowed and in some cases required to disclose that information to law enforcement,” he told Politico. “But if there’s an imminent threat to an unborn person in a pro-life state, this rule would prohibit the provider from disclosing that information to save that life. They’re creating an abortion exception to the HIPAA regime.” Severino expects the AGs will sue.

...
 
Let's not stand in the way of people slaughtering children.

It is a need for those on the left.

They are too dumb to use a condom you know.
 
the foundation of federalism is that STATES make their own societies and laws......but they have ZERO authority over what you do in any other state. NONE.

that they AGs are considering this is laughable. I hope they try it though. They deserve to be smacked down for it.
 
Let's not stand in the way of people slaughtering children.

It is a need for those on the left.

They are too dumb to use a condom you know.

More stupidity from you.


Republi'cans' want to ban any Sex Ed and also access to Birth Control.

MAGA means to take America to back when it was great, which was when women's place was in the home barefoot and pregnant and PoC and women had no rights and step by step they are trying to recreate and force that.


 
Republicans are vile, both in concept and in practice.

States where they don't have majority power need to separate from red states as soon as possible
or there will be no civilized place to live on this continent.

We can't blame only conservatives for the corruption of our nation.

We must also blame luke-warm progressives
who believe that the republic in its current configuration is still viable.

We can't change the minds of the lower life forms who vote Republican
but we don't need to be unified with the vile cretins.
 
A State CAN criminalize an activity in the State, whether the citizens agree with the law or not. You will break the law in that State, if you then do it.

A State CANNOT criminalize an activity you might do in another State, when it is LEGAL to do it there, Your State may not allow gambling but when in Vegas you are not breaking the law, as it is legal there.


That is a foundational premise of the law as the State does not OWN you, and you are not the State's possession, so they cannot tell you what you can and cannot do in OTHER jurisdictions where the activity is LEGAL. It is not enough for the State to say 'It is illegal to do here (the activity is prohibited in THIS jurisdiction) therefore you the CITIZEN cannot do it anywhere.

They assert control of their jurisdiction but not you specifically, so it is only when you break that law in THEIR jurisdiction you then break the law. That is core to law. It is jurisdiction dependent and NOT citizen dependant, no matter where they are. It is out of season to fish Salmon where you are and you will break the law to fish it, but in season in another State, you are free to go as the law does not apply to you, the citizen, it applies to the jurisdiction.


Now Republi'can' AG's across the country are trying to get control of the Citizen and not just have control of the State and the Law.

So if you gamble in Vegas (have an abortion out of State) they want to say that even though it was legal there, the law applies to your body no matter the jurisdiction as the State has jurisdiction over your body even as it travels. No matter where it travels.

The endangered FETUS is not the woman's body.
 
A State CAN criminalize an activity in the State, whether the citizens agree with the law or not. You will break the law in that State, if you then do it.

A State CANNOT criminalize an activity you might do in another State, when it is LEGAL to do it there, Your State may not allow gambling but when in Vegas you are not breaking the law, as it is legal there.


That is a foundational premise of the law as the State does not OWN you, and you are not the State's possession, so they cannot tell you what you can and cannot do in OTHER jurisdictions where the activity is LEGAL. It is not enough for the State to say 'It is illegal to do here (the activity is prohibited in THIS jurisdiction) therefore you the CITIZEN cannot do it anywhere.

They assert control of their jurisdiction but not you specifically, so it is only when you break that law in THEIR jurisdiction you then break the law. That is core to law. It is jurisdiction dependent and NOT citizen dependant, no matter where they are. It is out of season to fish Salmon where you are and you will break the law to fish it, but in season in another State, you are free to go as the law does not apply to you, the citizen, it applies to the jurisdiction.


Now Republi'can' AG's across the country are trying to get control of the Citizen and not just have control of the State and the Law.

So if you gamble in Vegas (have an abortion out of State) they want to say that even though it was legal there, the law applies to your body no matter the jurisdiction as the State has jurisdiction over your body even as it travels. No matter where it travels.

President Moron claimed that our children are not ours.
 
The endangered FETUS is not the woman's body.

Fetus DO NOT have personhood nor rights.

A state may be able to prevent the act of abortion happening in their State. They can 'govern' which 'acts' can be done in their State (no gambling, no smoking marijuana, no abortions, etc) but they CANNOT extend out to say the person cannot engage in those things in States or Countries where they are legal.

It is only illegal to have an abortion in a State, where that State imposes that legislation.

To say that a State can extend out and prosecute those who do those actions in other States, is treating State law as if it is Federal Law and applicable across the entire country. Sates are not allowed to define what is legal or not in another State.

A fundamental precept of Law is that a person must be tried for their crime in the location where the crime took place. So if Alabama says it is illegal for someone to go NYS for an abortion that crime would be happening in NYS and must be tried there. Obviously Alabama officials cannot do that.

But then conserva'tards' hate the Law.
 
Republicans are vile, both in concept and in practice.

States where they don't have majority power need to separate from red states as soon as possible
or there will be no civilized place to live on this continent.

We can't blame only conservatives for the corruption of our nation.

We must also blame luke-warm progressives
who believe that the republic in its current configuration is still viable.

We can't change the minds of the lower life forms who vote Republican
but we don't need to be unified with the vile cretins.

And we also need a law to prevent people from blue states moving to red states as they are doing now.

Let them stay in the shit they created and not ruin ours.
 
Fetus DO NOT have personhood nor rights.

A state may be able to prevent the act of abortion happening in their State. They can 'govern' which 'acts' can be done in their State (no gambling, no smoking marijuana, no abortions, etc) but they CANNOT extend out to say the person cannot engage in those things in States or Countries where they are legal.

It is only illegal to have an abortion in a State, where that State imposes that legislation.

To say that a State can extend out and prosecute those who do those actions in other States, is treating State law as if it is Federal Law and applicable across the entire country. Sates are not allowed to define what is legal or not in another State.

A fundamental precept of Law is that a person must be tried for their crime in the location where the crime took place. So if Alabama says it is illegal for someone to go NYS for an abortion that crime would be happening in NYS and must be tried there. Obviously Alabama officials cannot do that.

But then conserva'tards' hate the Law.

Agreed to all of your points

but as to "conserva'tards " hating the Law,

they do enough damage writing unbelievably stupid ones.
 
And we also need a law to prevent people from blue states moving to red states as they are doing now.

Let them stay in the shit they created and not ruin ours.

You don't have to worry about me, Tink.

All I know about red states is that I don't want to get any on me.
 
You don't have to worry about me, Tink.

All I know about red states is that I don't want to get any on me.

Since you are near room temperature and posted that you are limited to the donut shop, you have no problem.

Just await the Grim Reaper circling overhead.
 
Great, now tell all your friends in California and New York to stay out of Texas and Florida.

Sure, not that I owe you a favor or anything.

Florida USED to be a good place to have a few laughs.
I can't imagine why anybody would have ever gone to Texas for any reason, however.
 
Sure, not that I owe you a favor or anything.

Florida USED to be a good place to have a few laughs.
I can't imagine why anybody would have ever gone to Texas for any reason, however.

The reason you can’t imagine why anybody would have ever gone to Texas is because you are uninformed and stupid.

Top Reasons to Move to Texas

Affordable Living. One of the most practical reasons to move to Texas is that Texas homes are comparatively affordable. ...
No State Income Tax. ...
Endless Job Opportunities. ...
Top-Notch Higher Education. ...
Weather. ...
The Texas Hill Country. ...
Southern Hospitality. ...
The Diverse Culture.
 
The reason you can’t imagine why anybody would have ever gone to Texas is because you are uninformed and stupid.

Top Reasons to Move to Texas

Affordable Living. One of the most practical reasons to move to Texas is that Texas homes are comparatively affordable. ...
No State Income Tax. ...
Endless Job Opportunities. ...
Top-Notch Higher Education. ...
Weather. ...
The Texas Hill Country. ...
Southern Hospitality. ...
The Diverse Culture.

You left out the best reason to stay the hell away from that shit hole state--Texans.
One doesn't want to be seen next to an adult male with cowboy boots and a cowboy hat, J.R....I mean Earl.
 
Back
Top