16 years ago today, DEMOCRAT failures led to mass murder

There are clear actions that could have been taken and policies that could have been pursued to avoid the attacks on our country. However, these signs were misunderstood, ignored, and/or minimized.

Osama bin Laden was clearly a foe of America up until the day a U.S. Navy SEAL team assassinated him in Pakistan.

Bin Laden had a clear and consistent message that he let the world know explicitly.

With that in mind, it is important to take a step back to the beginning of the Clinton administration.

In 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed by an Islamist extremist group with clear ties to Bin Laden, and this fact was recorded and subsequently led to the National Intelligence Estimate two years later in 1995, which noted that a group of terrorists who “lacked strong organization but rather loose affiliations” could be a threat to national security interests (9/11 Commission Report, p. 341).

Again, these facts were seemingly ignored.

Another clear piece of intelligence of Bin Laden's intentions came in 1996, and this was the infamous fatwa. He also praised the 1992 bombing in Aden, and especially the 1993 firefight in Somalia resulting in Americans leaving “the area carrying disappointment, humiliation, defeat, and dead” (9/11 Commission Report, p. 48).

So why didn't Clinton stop Bin Laden?


bill-clinton-05.jpg



https://mic.com/articles/56239/why-didn-t-bill-clinton-go-after-osama-bin-laden
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Once again we find hate filled, partisan Righties taking Clinton out of context in order to justify their lies.

What he said was quite clear:

Osama "had committed NO CRIME AGAINST AMERICA, so I did not bring him here because we had NO BASIS on which to hold him."

This is just another one of those "damned if he does, damned if he doesn't" scenario's cooked up by Righties with Clinton Derangement Syndrome.

Clinton obeys the rule of law and lying Righties claim he "refused" to do anything...Clinton goes after Osama and they claim he was taking the law into his own hands.

Honest, patriotic Americans know what happened on 9/11.

Partisan hacks still try to blame Clinton.
Click to expand...

and yet you publicly proclaimed that if you saw someone carrying a gun, you would call the police, even though no crime had been committed. so stop with the faux outrage about rule of law.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
and yet you publicly proclaimed that if you saw someone carrying a gun, you would call the police, even though no crime had been committed. so stop with the faux outrage about rule of law.
Click to expand...


What makes Zappacrite's poutrage so pathetic and repugnant is the fact that he misrepresented Slick Willy's excuse for letting Bin Ladin live.

Here's the excuse Slick Willy gave just 10 hours before Osama murdered nearly 3,000 Americans.

"I would have to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children. And so I didn't do it."

Roughly five months before September 11, though, Clinton ordered airstrikes in Afghanistan and a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan. He didn't let faux concerns about innocent women and children stop him then.
 
Getin the ring said:
911 was indeed the result of Bill Clinton being "preoccupied" let's say.
No argument there.

The greater sadness is that liberals by and large still have not learned that being pro-active is really the only thing that can stop another 911.
By their policy we have to wait on someone to attack us before we can defend ourselves.

Exactly what is happening today with North Korea. Should be obvious to free thinkers that we have a direct threat to not only our security but that of most of the free world, and Kim Dong is standing on a soap box yelling such trying to warn us.

yet Trump by all accounts probably feels terribly hand cuffed by past aggression mainly our going into Iraq to verify there were no WMD's, the left is still whining we had no right.

So, we wait, NK lobs a nuke, liberal history writes it was on Trumps watch. Convenient how the left is never wrong huh?
Click to expand...
Pound Every Preppy's Pampered Piehole Into Pulp


So the spoiled and sheltered pro-war draftdodger could just twiddle his thumbs, knowing that if anything bad happened, it coul be blamed on Clinton, because somehow being an anti-war draftdodger is even worse than being a shirklng hypocrite. What's more, the Heirguardsman and his Tonto, Darth Evader, called off all of Clinton's attacks on Al Qaida, believing that terrorism was a "Jew problem." His fellow Chickenhawk GOPers believed Clinton's actions were an uncalled-for Wag the Dog distraction.
 
Just watch ABC's path to 9/11. Bill Clinton repeatedly ignored threats from OBL, and AQ. He even turned down a chance from Sudan to capture him, and turned down sever CIA ops in A-stan to kill him.

I realize hindsight is 20/20. But the blame has to land squarely on Clinton Admin.
 
The 9/11 commission found that Bill Clinton had multiple opportunities to stop Bin Laden. Clinton never acted.

https://9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Exec.htm

Complicit?

The Saudis donated generously to the Clinton Foundation.

https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/08/29/hillary-and-the-clinton-foundation-exemplars-of-americas-political-rot/

Solicitation? Collusion?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top