16-Year-Old Drunk Driver Who Killed Four Escapes Jail — Because He Is Rich!

Out-of-the-box thinkers like myself are always persecuted for wanting to use the government to ensure equal justice and protection under the law.

It's the evil corporatists that align up against us. As long as they can deploy their army of overpriced lawyers to attack us, the crony capitalist fascists are happy.

Damn Taft; you do stupid well!! LOL
 
I never said probation was jail dimwit; I indicated that ten years’ probation with treatment was correctly perceived by the jurist in the case as being the harsher option than incarceration which would have resulted in him serving a mere two years.

But you're an idiot stuck on stupid and determined to defend Marxist meme of the threads author and source.

Well dimwit; if you sound like a Marxist and rant like a Marxist, you just might be a Marxist.

Who did you vote for in the last six Presidential elections?

And back to the point, idiot... You failed to identify ONE thing the alternet article made up. He did escape jail and the article noted that he was given probation.

I don't sound like a Marxist or rant like a Marxist. You are a just fucking idiotic fascist who abuses the term.

I already answered you on that. Here it is again, mush-brain.

Johnson
Nobody
Nobody
Browne
Browne
Bush
 
Thanks Brother.

But I can't believe he prefers the current system of a prosecutor with unlimited taxpayer resources behind him going after some poor inner-city kid with a $30K a year court appointed hack lawyer.

So you want everybody to be stuck "with a $30k a year court appointed hack?" If that is what you are concerned about then the answer is to reduce the resources given to prosecutors.
 
And back to the point, idiot... You failed to identify ONE thing the alternet article made up. He did escape jail and the article noted that he was given probation.

I don't sound like a Marxist or rant like a Marxist. You are a just fucking idiotic fascist who abuses the term.

I already answered you on that. Here it is again, mush-brain.

Johnson
Nobody
Nobody
Browne
Browne
Bush

Once again dimwit; nothing I say could be construed as Fascist so please stop with the moronic meme.

As for fabrications, because you are a fool, you cannot wrap that small brain of yours around the FACT that it was not about "privilege" which was the talking point of the article and the dimwitted leftist that authored the post; try a reading comprehension course for a change. It would do you good dimwit.

Carry on; you're dimwitted tirade is no longer entertaining.
 
Stupid comes natural to him just like it does with you, mush brain.

This is rather ironic from a dimwit who has the reading comprehension of an earthworm and who appears to be trying to be the male equivalent of Evince.

Dismissed dumbass; you’re special brand of stupid has become a bore.
 
So you want everybody to be stuck "with a $30k a year court appointed hack?"

Isn't that equality? You have something against equality? Are you an elitist?

If it's good enough for a government run medical profession, why wouldn't it be good enough for a government run legal profession?

Rationed health care, rationed legal assistance.
 
Once again dimwit; nothing I say could be construed as Fascist so please stop with the moronic meme.

As for fabrications, because you are a fool, you cannot wrap that small brain of yours around the FACT that it was not about "privilege" which was the talking point of the article and the dimwitted leftist that authored the post; try a reading comprehension course for a change. It would do you good dimwit.

Carry on; you're dimwitted tirade is no longer entertaining.

"Talking point" is just a dodge because you can't point to anything of substance that they made up, faked or fabricated. You are just a lying idiot, that did not like the facts and went on a tirade to attack the messenger. Your partisan filter probably caused you to imagine they claimed things they did not.
 
This is rather ironic from a dimwit who has the reading comprehension of an earthworm and who appears to be trying to be the male equivalent of Evince.

Dismissed dumbass; you’re special brand of stupid has become a bore.

You are the one who imagined that the alternet article made stuff up. You are nothing but a delusional mush brain.
 
"Talking point" is just a dodge because you can't point to anything of substance that they made up, faked or fabricated. You are just a lying idiot, that did not like the facts and went on a tirade to attack the messenger. Your partisan filter probably caused you to imagine they claimed things they did not.

:thisisgettinggood:
 
Since you have failed to show that anything was made up how about returning to the discussion, mush brain?

He drove shit faced drunk at 30 miles over the speed limit. That was not an accident. According to his lawyer's "defense" he's used to getting whatever he wants and so it is very likely he will act with negligent and callous disregard of other's lives in the future. He should be incarcerated for a term but I would have him paying restitution to his victim's families for 20 years.

I don't see that this is due to a high priced legal defense. His defense was stupid and if anything works against him to show that he is continuing threat. The judge is the problem.
 
Since you have failed to show that anything was made up how about returning to the discussion, mush brain?

Once again, and only because you are stuck on stupid: The thread title: 16-Year-Old Drunk Driver Who Killed Four Escapes Jail — Because He Is Rich!

….and: Afluenza a get out of jail free card for the rich and famous, and anyone who can afford a high powered lawyer.

In addition, you keep prattling about this being a crime and not an accident; if you can prove that he knowingly and deliberately aimed the car at the people who were hurt and killed, then yes, you would have a crime. Otherwise, it was indeed an accident.
Dumbass.

In addition, and only because you are stuck on stupid; he didn't "escape jail", the jurist felt that ten years probation and sending him to rehab was a much stronger penalty and would possibly save lives when this dysfunctional being was released rather than mere incarceration in a juvenile detention facility because he was a juvenile and only 16.

I know you want to stay stuck on stupid so I will refrain from responding to any more of your lame dimwitted prattle.
 
To me, fairness has always included the requirement that bad people be miserable and suffer to an appropriate degree. Not seeing bad people suffer has always made me miserable.

I don't personally believe much in forgiveness. Bad people rarely seek it. I don't believe in rehabilitation of bad people, as it rarely happens, and is most often just a false promise so we can all be gullible and show leniency.

Forgiveness in my life mostly comes out of my own, weak nature, or when I am too lazy to deal with drama or too stupid to understand the situation going on around me.

A 16 year old kid, doing something A LOT of people do, shouldn't be turned into a career criminal. It doesn't benefit society.
 
Back
Top