11.3 Billion!

So are you comfortable with Iran having 480KG of 60% and the technology to build bombs and ICBMs?
So are you saying Trump was lying when he said Iran's nuclear program was obliderated?

Or are you saying an "obliterated" program can be reconstituted to a serious threat needing to be 'obliderated" again every few months with a ne war?

If the latter do you not think Trump needs to let the US citizens know this is an unending action that will need to re-occur with a new war every few months?
 
So are you saying Trump was lying when he said Iran's nuclear program was obliderated?

Or are you saying an "obliterated" program can be reconstituted to a serious threat needing to be 'obliderated" again every few months with a ne war?

If the latter do you not think Trump needs to let the US citizens know this is an unending action that will need to re-occur with a new war every few months?
The program was obliterated the u235 was entombed far underground. Trump warned them not to restart their program or we would be back. Promises made promises kept.
 
The program was obliterated the u235 was entombed far underground. Trump warned them not to restart their program or we would be back. Promises made promises kept.
Yet, they are now claiming that was not the reason for the invasion. The reason for the invasion, Netenyahoooo convinced DonOld the Demented to invade Iran.
 
The program was obliterated the u235 was entombed far underground. Trump warned them not to restart their program or we would be back. Promises made promises kept.
Right.

So "obliteration" is a big thing right?

Hard to do anything more than obliterate, correct?

So by your own admission here oblitetation at BEST means only a few months set back before the threat is big enough that the US has to go to war again.

Meaning Iran is the one in control here with regards to how and when the US will be forced to act again as they seem to always be able to restart easily and quickly even after being obliterated.
 
Iran has put satellites in space and that is the same technology needed for ICBMs. Most experts say it is easy to enrich 60% uranium to 95%.
Iran launches it's own rockets for smaller satellites, but uses Russian launch facilities for high end stuff.
'Most experts' is a void reference. Useless.

However, enriching 60% to weapons grade still requires centrifuges, which were destroyed. These aren't small items. They are large ungainly beasts that must be built and leveled on site, due to their mass. We will see such activity and promptly destroy it again. 60% to weapons grade takes less time than 0.7% to weapons grade, so the 60% stuff is a problem. Blowing it up produces a lot of dangerous fallout for nearby citizens if the stuff is above ground.

AI Overview



Enriching uranium from 60% to 90%+ (weapons-grade) is technically faster and easier than the initial, difficult process of reaching 60%
. Because the majority of

is already removed, less material needs processing, allowing for a rapid, final jump in concentration, often using the same, existing centrifuge technology.
You needed AI to answer this question?? Frankly, I'm surprised it got it right. AI is fuckin' dumb.
 
Back
Top