10 years later, the real story behind Columbine

Man, something about those teenagers being killed for being Christians stank as propaganda and a lie.
That part was a lie. If the question was asked, they only passed by believing she would be killed in the explosion that they had planned that didn't go off.
 
That's only true because they were so inept at wiring bombs. They believed that they were prepared, apparently.

I just read the entire story; it was well done.
They actually tested the wiring on different bombs before. They had actually been in trouble for blowing stuff up...

The bomb was going to be the coup de gras, instead it was a dud, so were the ones in the parking lot.
 
Conservatives killed the children at colombine

Conservatives were colombine

Conservatives are colombine

Without Conservatives, no one would die and everyone would be happy
 
Conservatives killed the children at colombine

Conservatives were colombine

Conservatives are colombine

Without Conservatives, no one would die and everyone would be happy

Watermark just failed BIO 088.

img.functions.php
 
Good story.

Lies always seem to be a part of the equation in the first few years of something big like this.
 
True... just look at Bowling for Columbine... one friggin lie after another in that piece of shit.
That's because he's stupid enough to fall for the idea that an act of terrorism was only about the guns.

These guys made a point of leaving behind thousands and thousands of pages of writing and video to tell people what they were about, they were about injecting fear and becoming famous.
 
That's because he's stupid enough to fall for the idea that an act of terrorism was only about the guns.

These guys made a point of leaving behind thousands and thousands of pages of writing and video to tell people what they were about, they were about injecting fear and becoming famous.

Which is exactly why I think all mention of the two cowards should be void of any name recognition. 'Assholes 1 & 2' or 'Cowards 1 & 2' is so much more appropriate.

Lard Ass just wanted to make a propaganda piece attacking the NRA. He knew it would sell and make him money off of the tragedy that occured here.
 
And it was used by people to create whatever they wanted to promote as the cause.

Sociopath and a follower is all they were.

Now tell me what were the lies in Bowling for Columbine about this one.
 
And it was used by people to create whatever they wanted to promote as the cause.

Sociopath and a follower is all they were.

Now tell me what were the lies in Bowling for Columbine about this one.
Geez. Seriously? There were craploads of them in that flick, over the time I've known you we covered the topic copiously.

http://www.hardylaw.net/Truth_About_Bowling.html

We'll let a documentarian talk to you about it. He has some standing.

It's very easy to believe whatever it is you see if you feel it buttresses your position, but will you actually read and change based on information inconvenient to your ideals?
 
I guess I should just take this guys word for all his corrections of the record?


The really funny thing is watching bowling for columbine actually softened my gun views.

I came away feeling that it wasnt the guns it was the people.

Its the mindset of the right that makes guns more dangerous.

I will never support a gun ban in the US.
 
I guess I should just take this guys word for all his corrections of the record?


The really funny thing is watching bowling for columbine actually softened my gun views.

I came away feeling that it wasnt the guns it was the people.

Its the mindset of the right that makes guns more dangerous.

I will never support a gun ban in the US.

Or you could look at all of the sources he uses to show that he is right. Or you could look at Fatboy's admissions that he did.

WHAT 'mindset of the right' makes guns more dangerous?

Please do elaborate on that...
 
Back
Top