Flying to Russia for an awards dinner ( RT) is enough to start an investigation? the FBI isn't Stasi .I don't disagree at all with the fact that the Trump campaign's characters were under surveillance; they were properly so. Your (group your) outrage about it, though, is hysterically funny. If Obama or Clinton's workers had been flying to Russia, having secret and not-so-secret meetings with Russians (or any other foreign nationals), and chatting via insecure phones with Russians, you guys would be calling them traitors and setting up the gallows for some hangings. But since the Russians connived and Trump got selected, you're now all butthurt that this is being revealed.
You (group you) are traitors to the United States.
His team did have contact with Russia. So why was he saying they didn't?
Flying to Russia for an awards dinner ( RT) is enough to start an investigation? the FBI isn't Stasi .
and these were extraordinary steps -FISA warrants/informant(s) eavesdropping / digital investigations.
There was no underlying evidence of a crime - just like Mueller it was a fishing expedition.
No. Last time I looked- talking to Russians isn't a basis at all for an intrusive investigation
One would think that if there was anything incriminating Mueller would have it by now and could wrap this thing up. And don't give me this "he wants to be thorough" bullshit. Trust me, if they had Capone on a murder charge, they aren't going to wait three years trying to investigate every single thing. They are going to roll him up.
This is why you see the left running to Stormy. But, they have great risk in doing that.
lol, I'm not reading anything you post more than a tweet length.
first off talking to Russians should not start an investigation unless there was some underlying evidence
there was some collusion/ talking to Russians is not evidence of a crime
I doubt Trump knew -and talking to Russians is not a basis for an investigation whatsoever.Because he was Secretary of State.
Trump said "no one on [his] team has ever had contact with Russia". He said that several times. So that was a lie, wasn't it? His team did have contact with Russia. So why was he saying they didn't?
secondly the surveillance was extraordinary -not just phone taps, but informants, and Emails,and "secret letters"-\why? and this was on American citizens who are supposedly protected by the 4th
either Trump did not know, or he used his typical broken speech to mean not talking for nefarious purposes (collusion)Trump said, multiple times, that neither he nor anyone on his campaign had contact with Russia. So he lied. He did have contact with Russia. So why did he say he didn't? What would be the reason Trump would go on TV and say to the camera that no one on his team "had any contact with Russia"?
who do you mean exactly? what conversations?Why was Trump's team talking to Russians under FBI surveillance?
I doubt Trump knew -and talking to Russians is not a basis for an investigation whatsoever.
Kerry just met with Iranian officials after he was Sec of State -like last week.
Yates used a similar situation with Flynn (although Flynn was on the transition team -Kerry out of Office)
to claim Flynn was compromised,and set the FBI on his ass.
The investigative agents did not think Flynn was lying -yet Flynn was indicted by Mueller,
Papa was a low level sit in on an advisory board -hardly part of the camapign.There is underlying evidence; Papadopolous' plea deal. He pled guilty to lying to the FBI about...wait for it...contact with Russia. We only found out about it because he couldn't keep his mouth shut.
George Papadopoulos, who worked for President Trump's campaign as a foreign policy adviser, has pleaded guilty to lying to FBI agents about meeting a professor with Russian ties who had promised to provide "dirt" on Trump's Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton.
either Trump did not know, or he used his typical broken speech to mean not talking for nefarious purposes (collusion)
either Trump did not know, or he used his typical broken speech to mean not talking for nefarious purposes (collusion)
first off talking to Russians should not start an investigation unless there was some underlying evidence
there was some collusion/ talking to Russians is not evidence of a crime
secondly the surveillance was extraordinary -not just phone taps, but informants, and Emails,and "secret letters"-\why? and this was on American citizens who are supposedly protected by the 4th