That one is another ignore. He and Uncensored need to get together and make a butt-baby.Your fucks attacked police with real weapons
Donnie pardoned them
That one is another ignore. He and Uncensored need to get together and make a butt-baby.Your fucks attacked police with real weapons
Donnie pardoned them
trump's DOJ is nothing but a trump cult hit squad.But... but... @T. A. Gardner insists these people will likely just take a plea deal as the DoJ has such a high conviction rate when they bring a case.
I have told Terry he is being stupid as he is looking at the DoJ prior to Trump, and while that was true them, Trump and has put in Magats, and magats are stupid and corrupt and incompetent, so what you will see with Trump's DoJ is not only most people opting to go to court but also winning like this guy did.
As i always say the Dems super power against magats is the magats stupidity and incompetence. Over and over magats bring investigations and prosecutions that fail. So it is either A) corrupt or B) incompetence that sees them fail and magats who are so sure these Dems are guilty have to choose which reason it is? Why so many 'guilty' dems get off time and again when magats indict??
There was no 'not guilty' verdict, Marty.A jury on Thursday acquitted a D.C. man who was charged with assault after throwing a sandwich at a federal agent during President Donald Trump’s crime crackdown in the capital.
The one-sided food fight, which was captured on video and spread through social media, became a slapstick symbol of resistance to Trump’s summertime takeover of local law enforcement. The defendant, Sean C. Dunn, said he was speaking out against fascism and anti-migrant policies from the Trump administration.
U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office said the 37-year-old Air Force veteran was not on trial for protesting but for “throwing a sandwich at a federal officer at point-blank range.” Prosecutors sought to indict Dunn on a felony assault count, but a grand jury rejected that charge, and prosecutors downgraded it to a misdemeanor.
The trial jury in U.S. District Court rejected that charge as well, deliberating for seven hours over two days before returning the not-guilty verdict.
Gotta love the "point blank range".
DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE, POORBOY!I see you are all for shitting all over the US Constitution.
He just made it, moron.So Topless, what's your point????
Why did nobody thow himself on the sandwich to protect his comrades?It hurts the prosecution's case when the witness claims the sandwich exploded on hitting him and then the jury sees a picture of the sandwich intact in its wrapper lying on the sidewalk.
So, throwing food at law enforcement is ok in your mindset?I support his acquittal. The receiver of the sandwich should have laughed it off with his cop friends. But he and they went bananas.
When I was a prosecutor I let my intern pick a case to handle and I was very busy the week before so I did not review it. The police had arrested the guy for battery so, how bad could it be.I had a sub for lunch today. I would never waste a good sandwich by throwing it.
Didn't say it was "ok". It was in bad taste.So, throwing food at law enforcement is ok in your mindset?
More proof of the corruption endemic in leftist controlled courts. He was obviously guilty of assault.A jury on Thursday acquitted a D.C. man who was charged with assault after throwing a sandwich at a federal agent during President Donald Trump’s crime crackdown in the capital.
The one-sided food fight, which was captured on video and spread through social media, became a slapstick symbol of resistance to Trump’s summertime takeover of local law enforcement. The defendant, Sean C. Dunn, said he was speaking out against fascism and anti-migrant policies from the Trump administration.
U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office said the 37-year-old Air Force veteran was not on trial for protesting but for “throwing a sandwich at a federal officer at point-blank range.” Prosecutors sought to indict Dunn on a felony assault count, but a grand jury rejected that charge, and prosecutors downgraded it to a misdemeanor.
The trial jury in U.S. District Court rejected that charge as well, deliberating for seven hours over two days before returning the not-guilty verdict.
Gotta love the "point blank range".
Indeed.More proof of the corruption endemic in leftist controlled courts. He was obviously guilty of assault.
A jury on Thursday acquitted a D.C. man who was charged with assault after throwing a sandwich at a federal agent during President Donald Trump’s crime crackdown in the capital.
The one-sided food fight, which was captured on video and spread through social media, became a slapstick symbol of resistance to Trump’s summertime takeover of local law enforcement. The defendant, Sean C. Dunn, said he was speaking out against fascism and anti-migrant policies from the Trump administration.
U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office said the 37-year-old Air Force veteran was not on trial for protesting but for “throwing a sandwich at a federal officer at point-blank range.” Prosecutors sought to indict Dunn on a felony assault count, but a grand jury rejected that charge, and prosecutors downgraded it to a misdemeanor.
The trial jury in U.S. District Court rejected that charge as well, deliberating for seven hours over two days before returning the not-guilty verdict.
Gotta love the "point blank range".
More proof of the corruption endemic in leftist controlled courts. He was obviously guilty of assault.
Damn liberals get away with *everything.* Assault with sandwich, wearing fuzzy costumes in public, protesting our king Donald the Vulgarian. lol
I see you are all for shitting all over the US Constitution.
I guess they felt that they should at least get a sandwich for the DOJ wasting their time.

I think for a group like the trump thugs who preach not being "woke" or "needing a safe space" crumble like little girls when someone throws a sandwich at them!
The MAGAT sobriquet "snowflakes!" has a whole new meaning now, eh? 