Biden calls 9mm ‘high-caliber weapons,’ suggests banning them

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dutch Uncle

* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Just in from Fox News: Biden calls 9mm ‘high-caliber weapons,’ suggests banning them
Recounting a visit to a New York trauma hospital, Biden said doctors showed him X-rays of gunshot wounds.

"They said a .22-caliber bullet will lodge in the lung, and we can probably get it out — may be able to get it and save the life. A 9mm bullet blows the lung out of the body," Biden said.

"So, the idea of these high-caliber weapons is, uh, there’s simply no rational basis for it in terms of self-protection, hunting," Biden added. "Remember, the Constitution was never absolute."

"You couldn’t buy a cannon when the Second Amendment was passed," Biden said. "You couldn’t go out and purchase a lot of weaponry."

The president, however, ruled out the possibility of issuing an executive order on guns, saying: "I can’t dictate this stuff."

He'll never pass a ban in today's environment.
 
not likely, but he hurts his case by making things up. but he's ignorant and senile so I guess he doesnt know any different.

It does make him look out of touch. Did you complain about previous president's fuck ups? Most of them are old geezers.
 
Recounting a visit to a New York trauma hospital, Biden said doctors showed him X-rays of gunshot wounds.

"They said a .22-caliber bullet will lodge in the lung, and we can probably get it out — may be able to get it and save the life. A 9mm bullet blows the lung out of the body," Biden said.

"So, the idea of these high-caliber weapons is, uh, there’s simply no rational basis for it in terms of self-protection, hunting," Biden added. "Remember, the Constitution was never absolute."

"You couldn’t buy a cannon when the Second Amendment was passed," Biden said. "You couldn’t go out and purchase a lot of weaponry."

Does Biden think a .222, a .22-250 or a .220 Swift bullet will lodge in a lung and they can get it out? They're all considered .22s too .Really?

And yes, any American could own a cannon (or any other weapon of war) if they chose when the 2nd. Amendment was written because there was no longer a standing Army.
 
A .38 Special is more powerful than a 9mm.
So yes, the .40 S&W is much more powerful (depending on the load, but still more powerful) than a 9mm.

No. .38 Special is not more powerful than 9mm. 9mm> .38 Special.

Same weight bullet? 9mm has more velocity. Ergo 9mm> .38 Special.

.357 Magnum is more powerful than 9mm.
 
9mm > .38 cal. Its much faster.

.40>9mm>.38 Special

.40 cal has that bullet weight and a decent velocity.

I would not want to catch any of them. All big bullets that would hurt.

My pistol is a .38 Special, and it'll kill ya. It doesn't have the energy of a 9mm or .40 cal pistol, but if you run into me with it, that will not make you any less dead.

That's my 3rd favorite shooting gun. I know where them bullets are going to go.

I can hit a quarter with that thing.
 
Last edited:
No. .38 Special is not more powerful than 9mm. 9mm> .38 Special.

Same weight bullet? 9mm has more velocity. Ergo 9mm> .38 Special.

.357 Magnum is more powerful than 9mm.

The .38 is more powerful than the 9mm. That is a fact. It has a larger case and the bullet is .002 larger in diameter.

The .38 is capable of higher velocities than the 9mm. That is also a fact.

The .357 (the actual dia. of both the .38 and .357 bullet). is more powerful than the .38. The .357 has a longer case than the .38. A .38 can be fired in a .357.
 
The .38 is more powerful than the 9mm. That is a fact. It has a larger case and the bullet is .002 larger in diameter.

The .38 is capable of higher velocities than the 9mm. That is also a fact.

The .357 (the actual dia. of both the .38 and .357 bullet). is more powerful than the .38. The .357 has a longer case than the .38. A .38 can be fired in a .357.

RB.. just no..

.38 special is an intermediary round from the black powder days. Are the bullets bigger? Yes! Do they pack more energy than 9mm? No!

There is no ".38 Special ACP", brah.

I like the band though. Even though they got their start stealing Lynyrd Skynyrd's equipment.

 
Last edited:
Isn't a 40 caliber bullet more powerful than a 9mm?
It's not caliber (diameter) of the bullet per se but the amount of powder behind it. F = MA Force equals Mass times Acceleration. Newton's Second Law of Motion.

Consider the .45 and 9mm cartridges, a large controversy back in the day when the US military switched to 9mm for ammunition commonality. The .45 is slower but bigger while the 9mm is smaller but faster. They come out to be about the same in the F = MA formula.

The problem comes with penetration; if a bullet punches through a target and keeps going it takes that energy with it. The 9mm tends to penetrate further (or through) while the .45 leaves more of its energy on the target. If shooting at windshields, penetration is good, but if shooting at soft targets, it's not. I like the .45 for home defense. I often carry either of those two for semi-auto or a .38 revolver. It depends.

https://www.diffen.com/difference/.45_ACP_vs_9mm
A 9mm is generally cheaper, has less recoil and higher velocity than a .45 ACP. The .45 ACP (Automatic Colt Pistol) cartridge holds bullets that have a diameter of .452 inches (11.5mm) so it is slightly larger than the 9mm (.355 inch bullets). Both cartridges have a long history and were first designed over 100 years ago...

...Penetration
A 9mm averages between 8” and 15.9” penetration. However, the Winchester FMJ has a penetration of 24.5” and the Doubletap JFN+P trail defense has a penetration of 40”. The cartridge expands to approximately 0.35 to 0.72”.

A .45 averages about 11.3”-14.3” penetration. However, the Remington FMJ has 27” penetration. The cartridge expands to an average of 0.75” inches, but the Remington FMJ expands to 0.45”.


https://tacdynamics.com/end-the-debate-9mm-versus-45-acp-versus-whatever/
20130901-021911.jpg
 
For the 9 mm vs 38 Spl debate…it’s a good article and scientifically/physically sound.

http://www.ballistics101.com/9mm_vs_.38special.php

From the article:
Lets clear this up first and foremost. The 9mm is not puny. Compared to a 50 Cal.? Sure, but compared to a .38 Special? Nope. The .38 Special and 9mm are the same size bullet as far as I am concerned. Yes, the same size. They are within two thousandths of an inch of each other. The .38 Special measures .357" in diameter. The 9mm measures .355" in diameter. The slight difference in diameter is not relevant to any degree worth debating.

There’s a great chart for the varying bullet weights, speed and foot pounds at impact there too. I like both cartridges BTW. Have both. Have carried both. To each his own.
 
Nope. The 9mm has a much smaller case, so it can't hold as much powder as the .38.
The 9mm fires a .355 dia bullet, the .38 (and .357 mag.) fire a .357 dia. bullet.

However, it can hold much more volatile high-pressure smokeless powder than the .38 Special.
 
Nope. The 9mm has a much smaller case, so it can't hold as much powder as the .38.
The 9mm fires a .355 dia bullet, the .38 (and .357 mag.) fire a .357 dia. bullet.
You would think because the shell is bigger that it is also more powerful. But it isn't. The 9 mm is more powerful . Look it up if you think we are wrong. I own a couple .38 and a couple 9 mm and a .40 cal I like them all and they all will do the job.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top