Fox reports: fear causes gun buying

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
I have a good time here. I don't know or care WTF your purpose here is. You better than a troll? Come on, now! Obviously I'm getting under your skin just a tad. Take a freaking break, weakling!!!!!

The only way you could get "under my skin", Spud, is if you were an infection.
I respond to you; because I find your trolling amusing.
Every village needs an idiot and we were missing one, until you showed up. :)
 



fear.jpg
 
The only way you could get "under my skin", Spud, is if you were an infection.
I respond to you; because I find your trolling amusing.
Every village needs an idiot and we were missing one, until you showed up. :)

OK, but if you break down and cry I ain't letting you put your sobbing head on my shoulder!!!!!!!!! :)
 
The huge increase in gun sales post the election of President Barack Hussein Obama is total proof of the idiotic and fear driven personalities of rightwingers in general. President Barack Hussein Obama has not taken or threated to take anyone's guns. In fact, he is more conservative on firearms issues than his conservative predecessor.

The inaction on gun control of Obama and the Democratic Congress he enjoyed was/is only due to the Heller and McDonald decisions by SCOTUS.

Had Mayor Fenty obeyed and let Heller sit and stew at the DC Circuit, gun control actions taken nationally would have been more aggressive.

There will be no new laws written or any appeals pursued (except within "safe" federal appeals or Circuits) until Obama is re-elected and he has the opportunity to seat one or two Supreme Court Justices that can be counted on to reverse these recent inconveniences to the gun control agenda.

Any arguement that current national inactivity of anti-gun politicians (Obama included) represents any measure of political acceptance and tolerance of gun owners rights is just laughable.
 
The inaction on gun control of Obama and the Democratic Congress he enjoyed was/is only due to the Heller and McDonald decisions by SCOTUS. Had Mayor Fenty obeyed and let Heller sit and stew at the DC Circuit, gun control actions taken nationally would have been more aggressive. There will be no new laws written or any appeals pursued (except within "safe" federal appeals or Circuits) until Obama is re-elected and he has the opportunity to seat one or two Supreme Court Justices that can be counted on to reverse these recent inconveniences to the gun control agenda. Any arguement that current national inactivity of anti-gun politicians (Obama included) represents any measure of political acceptance and tolerance of gun owners rights is just laughable.





136022851215470331_Vh9pwIt8_c.jpg

 
The fact that the most disassociated from sanity hoplophobe here, that only demonstrates complete lack of respect or tolerance for gun ownership, gun owners and gun rights is calling me paranoid for saying there is no tolerance or acceptance of gun rights, is irrefutable proof that my position is correct.

It is sad when anti-social emotion drives the cognitive process.
 
The fact that the most disassociated from sanity hoplophobe here, that only demonstrates complete lack of respect or tolerance for gun ownership, gun owners and gun rights is calling me paranoid for saying there is no tolerance or acceptance of gun rights, is irrefutable proof that my position is correct. It is sad when anti-social emotion drives the cognitive process.

2011-02-23-The%2BGun%2BNut.jpg
 
Any argument that current national inactivity of anti-gun politicians (Obama included) represents any measure of political acceptance and tolerance of gun owners rights is just laughable.

The derision, hatred and ridicule coming from rabid anti-gunners for saying that only serves to prove the point.

That said anti-gunners are incapable of making the connection is hilarious.

Please, by all means keep it up; there might be a few people unconvinced that anyone can be that obtuse.

I thought I would give this board another try but if dealing with petulant, booger flicking children like you is the cost of being here, it just ain't worth it . . .



Christ on a Pink Pony sometimes I miss the good ol' days when gun rights supporters were "losing".

When I started on-line debate of gun rights / gun control and constitutional issues (1993) those opposed to gun rights could actually construct and argument and would ardently defend it.

Of course back then they had a shaky framework of legal support for the collective / state / militia right interpretation and I guess that propped up their ego. Even with that disadvantage it was a great time for knowledgeable gun rights supporters because the anti's never had the philosophical and historical record on their side; all they had were a few aberrant lower federal court decisions from the 1940's to build their arguments on.

Heller and McDonald have begun to re-right the constitutional ship but the vehement gun rights haters are still out there but their supporters in the realm of idea exchange have devolved into a mob of excrement throwing monkeys.

I visit a lot of boards searching for quality discussions but all I find are guys like \(\(\(\/)/)/)/ who don't know what they don't know and believe that makes them geniuses.

They delight in their ignorance because that gives them a perceived moral superiority to the "barbaric gun nut". It seems as though possessing any technical knowledge of guns or of the rights theory embraced by the framers and the fundamental principles of the Constitution would debase them. All that comes from them are one-liners, "I'm smarter than you" replies or imbecilic questions in response to someone taking the time to compose an on-point answer to an earlier nonsensical question.

Isn't it ironic that people who want to impose so many rules on the actions of everyone else can't abide by the simple, universal rules of debate in discussing what they want to do?

Are there any gun control supporters here that can actually engage in reasoned, logical debate?
 
Any argument that current national inactivity of anti-gun politicians (Obama included) represents any measure of political acceptance and tolerance of gun owners rights is just laughable.

The derision, hatred and ridicule coming from rabid anti-gunners for saying that only serves to prove the point.

That said anti-gunners are incapable of making the connection is hilarious.

Please, by all means keep it up; there might be a few people unconvinced that anyone can be that obtuse.

I thought I would give this board another try but if dealing with petulant, booger flicking children like you is the cost of being here, it just ain't worth it . . .

You aren't half as smart as you think you are. We suffered through 8 years of Cheney because pussies like you thought Gore would take your guns away. STFU.
 
You aren't half as smart as you think you are. We suffered through 8 years of Cheney because pussies like you thought Gore would take your guns away. STFU.

Is there something in the gun rights hating Kool-Aid you all drink that makes you such rot-gut-drunk-like insufferable boorish clods?

Projection is a very deep flaw in your interactions with others; really, why are you lefties so damn angry?

Explain how is it paranoid to be vigilant for the actions that you unhinged power-hungry absolutists openly pine for.

That we don't trust you is a common sense position, not demonstrative of any unwarranted fear.

No one should trust you or your ilk in a casual meeting on the street let alone granting you a shred of political power . . . In power the only thing your kind achieve is unanimity of the graveyard.
 
Is there something in the gun rights hating Kool-Aid you all drink that makes you such rot-gut-drunk-like insufferable boorish clods?

Projection is a very deep flaw in your interactions with others; really, why are you lefties so damn angry?

Explain how is it paranoid to be vigilant for the actions that you unhinged power-hungry absolutists openly pine for.

That we don't trust you is a common sense position, not demonstrative of any unwarranted fear.

No one should trust you or your ilk in a casual meeting on the street let alone granting you a shred of political power . . . In power the only thing your kind achieve is unanimity of the graveyard.

What kind is my kind? What is my stance on guns?
 
What kind is my kind? What is my stance on guns?

Your post told me all I needed to know about your partisan stance on guns and "your kind" is the kind that posts, well, like a rot-gut-drunk-like, insufferable, boorish clod.
 
Your post told me all I needed to know about your partisan stance on guns and "your kind" is the kind that posts, well, like a rot-gut-drunk-like, insufferable, boorish clod.

You're dead wrong. I am a gun rights advocate. Point your dirty finger somewhere else self rightous shithead.
 
You're dead wrong. I am a gun rights advocate. Point your dirty finger somewhere else self rightous shithead.

Post a link to a post where your "gun rights advocate" persona won out because all I see is asshole.

What is it with this board? Is it all just personal attacks? Is there anybody here that can actually discuss & debate?

Doesn't the turd sculpting get old?
 
Post a link to a post where your "gun rights advocate" persona won out because all I see is asshole.

What is it with this board? Is it all just personal attacks? Is there anybody here that can actually discuss & debate?

Doesn't the turd sculpting get old?

You come on here throwing darts then complain?
I don't have to prove anything to you, assume all you want, it is what you are good at.
 
Back
Top