VOTER FRAUD.....

You were gobbling it up until I pnwed you, Blabo.

You read and comprehended the "story" so well you didn't recognize the name of the conservative site you linked to.

BTW, good to know that you support WikiLeaks and Assange and find them credible.

Maybe you'd better check what Stratfor says on the subject:

some of the e-mails may be forged or altered to include inaccuracies; some may be authentic.”

I'm sure you'll declare the ones you want to be authentic to be authentic, won't you?

Poor Blabo.

Stratfor said some emails may be forged or altered? Funny, that's the same thing they said about another issue.

Leaked: Bin Laden not buried at sea, body moved on CIA plane to US


They went right into CYA mode over these supposed leaks.

"Stratfor, under the leadership of founder and Chief Executive George Friedman, said it would not be cowed. It said Friedman had not resigned as CEO, contrary to a bogus email circulating on the Internet.
Some of the emails being published "may be forged or altered to include inaccuracies; some may be authentic," the company statement said.
"We will not validate either. Nor will we explain the thinking that went into them. Having had our property stolen, we will not be victimized twice by submitting to questioning about them," the statement said."


http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/27/wikileaks-stratfor-idUSL5E8DR0120120227
 
Stratfor said some emails may be forged or altered? Funny, that's the same thing they said about another issue. Leaked: Bin Laden not buried at sea, body moved on CIA plane to US They went right into CYA mode over these supposed leaks. "Stratfor, under the leadership of founder and Chief Executive George Friedman, said it would not be cowed. It said Friedman had not resigned as CEO, contrary to a bogus email circulating on the Internet.
Some of the emails being published "may be forged or altered to include inaccuracies; some may be authentic," the company statement said. We will not validate either. Nor will we explain the thinking that went into them. Having had our property stolen, we will not be victimized twice by submitting to questioning about them," the statement said."
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/27/wikileaks-stratfor-idUSL5E8DR0120120227

Poor Blabo.
 
You were gobbling it up until I pnwed you, Blabo.

You read and comprehended the "story" so well you didn't recognize the name of the conservative site you linked to.

BTW, good to know that you support WikiLeaks and Assange and find them credible.

Maybe you'd better check what Stratfor says on the subject:

some of the e-mails may be forged or altered to include inaccuracies; some may be authentic.”

I'm sure you'll declare the ones you want to be authentic to be authentic, won't you?

Poor Blabo.

All of them. Don't you listen to the news on other than MSNBC ?

Who/what is "Spero" ? I didn't name the company

Don't make up shit, you Poor AssWipe...

YOU posted a link to speroforum, dunderhead. http://www.speroforum.com/a/JHJAYHFX...Obama-election


I said I didn't name the company way back in post 11 or 12.....wtf are you two ranting about..........are you two playing whos the bigger idiot...???
 
I'm saying that there are more questions raised than anything else.

1) The black Dems were caught stuffing the ballot boxes in Philly and Ohio as reported the night of the election and Sen. If people were actually caught in the act, why wasn't the election board notified at that moment?Why weren't the "stuffed ballots" impounded? McCain chose not to fight. Maybe McCain lost in spite of them (if they actually exist). The matter is not dead inside the party. It now becomes a matter of sequence now as to how and when to "out". No, the question is why this obvious crime wasn't brought to the attention of authorities in 2008.

It was already stated by McCain didn't pursue the matter and expose the fraud....that question was already answered.....
Caught in the act ?....Where did you get that ?....no details were given
Can't you two read or understand what you read?



2) It appears
Appears? Where's the proof? the Dems "made a donation" to Rev. Jesse (no, they would never do that!) to keep his yap shut after his diatribe about the Jews and Israel. A little bird told me it was a "nice six-figure donation". This also becomes a matter of how and when to out. If it's proven why wasn't it outed already?

Same answer as above......



3) The hunt is on for the sleezy Russian money into O-mans coffers. A smoking gun has already been found. Will get more on this when the time is right. My source was too giddy to continue. Can you say Clinton and ChiCom funny money? This also becomes a matter of how and when to out. No facts here, just a poorly-spelled allegation.

Depends on what the meaning of facts is......lol.....


Wikileaks isn't the topic here. I'm saying that this sounds like some wacky RW conspiracy theory that McCain wasn't even aware of.

RW conspiracy theory? What a hack.........Wikileaks is the source, fool....
Straford, the investagation company, learned the McCain staff had evidence of the fraud by the hacked emails that found there way to Wiki.....
Do I have to explain the entire issue to you, item by item....read the gd article.....
 
Last edited:
RW conspiracy theory? What a hack.........Wikileaks is the source, fool....
Straford, the investagation company, learned the McCain staff had evidence of the fraud by the hacked emails that found there way to Wiki.....
Do I have to explain the entire issue to you, item by item....read the gd article.....

Wikileaks didn't write the emails, they leaked what somebody else (Burton) wrote. So it's Burton's agenda I'm interested in, not the messenger's.

1) The black Dems were caught stuffing the ballot boxes in Philly and Ohio as reported the night of the election. If people were actually caught in the act, why wasn't the election board notified at that moment?Why weren't the "stuffed ballots" impounded?and Sen. McCain chose not to fight. Maybe McCain lost in spite of them (if they actually exist). The matter is not dead inside the party. It now becomes a matter of sequence now as to how and when to "out". No, the question is why this obvious crime wasn't brought to the attention of authorities in 2008.

It was already stated by McCain didn't pursue the matter and expose the fraud....that question was already answered.....
Caught in the act ?....Where did you get that ?....no details were given
Can't you two read or understand what you read?

Lol, and you think I'm dumb. Read the first sentence:
"The black Dems were caught stuffing the ballot boxes in Philly and Ohio as reported the night of the election ..." If they weren't caught in the act, how did "somebody" know they were black Dems? Why didn't the local election board notify authorities that a crime was committed? What proof do you have that this is something McCain was notified about?

2) It appears Appears? Where's the proof? the Dems "made a donation" to Rev. Jesse (no, they would never do that!) to keep his yap shut after his diatribe about the Jews and Israel. A little bird told me it was a "nice six-figure donation". This also becomes a matter of how and when to out. If it's proven why wasn't it outed already?

Same answer as above......


3) The hunt is on for the sleezy Russian money into O-mans coffers. A smoking gun has already been found. Will get more on this when the time is right. My source was too giddy to continue. Can you say Clinton and ChiCom funny money? This also becomes a matter of how and when to out. No facts here, just a poorly-spelled allegation.

Depends on what the meaning of facts is......lol.....


If all Burton can do is float some specious allegations (aka "no details were given"), then his remarks remain a conspiracy theory, IMO, and you're an idiot for not taking this with a large grain of salt.

 
Back
Top