If this continues, will the GOP will have anything to campaign on?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
Granule said:
Leave it to Democrats to celebrate modest reductions and declare them major triumphs.
Click to expand...

You mean PiMP is a Democrat? he keeps claiming that Bush "lifted restrictions" and lowered gas prices....
 
\\(())// said:
Cite.
Click to expand...

Light-Blue-Sky.jpeg


yves-klein-blue.jpg


http://www.mittromney.com/jobs
 
LOL, how'd Mittzie the multimillionaire do when he was running Mass?

A core argument of Romney’s presidential campaign is that he knows how to create jobs...

As governor, Romney faced his first test in applying his business background to a slow-growing economy — and data show that the results were unremarkable.

Massachusetts was one of just four states that by the time of the financial crisis still had not recovered all the jobs they had lost during the 2001 recession.

The state ranked 47th in job creation during his term.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/as-massachusetts-governor-romneys-record-on-jobs-was-unremarkable/2012/02/06/gIQABzEfxQ_story.html
 
\\(())// said:
Do the question marks mean you aren't sure, PiMP?
Click to expand...

no, the question marks are to demonstrate my surprise that you're stupid enough to require proof....

as for how it proves the contention, it requires math that may be beyond your capability.....it requires understanding that if more people are unemployed than there were when Obama became president it means that fewer people are actually working.....do you require proof of that as well?...and, if fewer people are actually working, it follows that there are fewer jobs...will it really matter if proof is provided if you aren't smart enough to comprehend it?.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
no, the question marks are to demonstrate my surprise that you're stupid enough to require proof....as for how it proves the contention, it requires math that may be beyond your capability.....it requires understanding that if more people are unemployed than there were when Obama became president it means that fewer people are actually working.....do you require proof of that as well?...and, if fewer people are actually working, it follows that there are fewer jobs...will it really matter if proof is provided if you aren't smart enough to comprehend it?.....
Click to expand...

Post the evidence, and I'll consider it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top