Zimmerman to be Charged....

How come you guys all say "no disrespect intended" before disagreeing with each other? Boy, I should only get so lucky to be treated like such a princess from any of you!
 
Right. A Registered Hispanic Democrat, who is actually "mixed race", who acted like a bloodthirsty registered white Republican. LOL


I love when you all prove to the entire board who (bigot) and what (racist, asshole) you are without any accusations from anyone....
 
No. But there should always be an investigation. Even in the circumstances you describe, to make sure that man didn't come home and find someone else consensually fucking his wife, killed him, and the wife is covering for him. In this case there was no investigation to speak of. I am glad we had one now. If he is acquitted eventually, well, then a jury will have found him innocent. But the system needs to work.


The system will have worked when Politics and public sentiment is not used to charge someone with a crime and make them stand trial for defending themselves....

but in this case, Politics and public sentiment will be used to charge someone with a crime and make them stand trial.


The racists will demand that any jury will be made up of blacks, a couple of token Hispanics and some liberal white lemmings.....and you'll call it justice.
 
No. But there should always be an investigation. Even in the circumstances you describe, to make sure that man didn't come home and find someone else consensually fucking his wife, killed him, and the wife is covering for him. In this case there was no investigation to speak of. I am glad we had one now. If he is acquitted eventually, well, then a jury will have found him innocent. But the system needs to work.

But juries don't find you innocent, they either find you guilty or not guilty of some alleged crime. In order to get to where a jury can do this, you have to first establish a crime was committed. I'm all for having an investigation, but if the investigation shows someone was acting in accordance with the law, regardless of my feelings about the law, he isn't guilty of a crime.
 
The system will have worked when Politics and public sentiment is not used to charge someone with a crime and make them stand trial for defending themselves....

but in this case, Politics and public sentiment will be used to charge someone with a crime and make them stand trial.

And you know this is what happened because the prosecutor called you up, shared her evidence with you, and told you so right?

I loveeeee how all the whiners on here have been crying for weeks about liberals who had Made Up Their Minds Without Knowing The Facts.

Now we see who really has been guilty of that. Well, it all comes out in the wash sweetie.
 
But juries don't find you innocent, they either find you guilty or not guilty of some alleged crime. In order to get to where a jury can do this, you have to first establish a crime was committed. I'm all for having an investigation, but if the investigation shows someone was acting in accordance with the law, regardless of my feelings about the law, he isn't guilty of a crime.

That's true, bad choice of words on my part.

As for the rest of this, I am not sure what you are saying. You don't know what the investigation has shown. A career prosecutor does. And if she has decided to bring charges, that's her decision to make based on the evidence you haven't seen and she has.
 
And you know this is what happened because the prosecutor called you up, shared her evidence with you, and told you so right?

I loveeeee how all the whiners on here have been crying for weeks about liberals who had Made Up Their Minds Without Knowing The Facts.

Now we see who really has been guilty of that. Well, it all comes out in the wash sweetie.

crying for weeks about liberals who had Made Up Their Minds Without Knowing The Facts.

Are you denying that this is what happened......???


There can be no facts known NOW what weren't known within 10 days of the incident.....and no charges were brought against the Hispanic then....

The only thing thats different is the politics (Obama's big mouth) and public sentiment ( the whining of the left, and the racists)threatening riots and demonstrations
and revenge against whites, whites that weren't and aren't involved from the start.....
 
There can be no facts known NOW what weren't known within 10 days of the incident.....and no charges were brought against the Hispanic then....

The only thing thats different is the politics (Obama's big mouth) and public sentiment ( the whining of the left, and the racists)threatening riots and demonstrations
and revenge against whites, whites that weren't even involved from the start.....

No disrespect intended Princess, but you really are a fucking idiot.

There was NO investigation to speak of in the days following the killing. That's why there was an outcry! If you can't grasp this simple fact, you have no hope of ever grasping the facts of this case, and you should not comment on them.
 
That's true, bad choice of words on my part.

As for the rest of this, I am not sure what you are saying. You don't know what the investigation has shown. A career prosecutor does. And if she has decided to bring charges, that's her decision to make based on the evidence you haven't seen and she has.

Oh, I know absolutely NOTHING about the case, I have been 100% disinterested, and plan to remain that way. And you are correct, if a prosecutor wants to charge Zimmerman with a crime and have a trial, that's their decision, and they will have to make the case. But such a thing should ONLY happen if evidence warrants it, and not because of public outcry. Indicting Zimmerman doesn't mean he is guilty, just that the prosecutor has decided to charge him with a crime, the case still has to be made before a jury and his defense presented as well, and that is way down the road. In the meantime, this guy has to endure the constant intense focus of the liberal media, who wants so badly to portray him as some vigilante race-hater or something, and basically give him a public lynching. It's not right, and it's not fair to him, and it's certainly not what a decent and civilized free society should be doing to someone without a trial.
 
When you have the President and Presidential candidates commenting on this it's pretty hard at this point, imo, to say that it's not political.

A story that saturates the news like this is going to be top of mind for EVERYONE from the president on down to Joe Sixpack, and naturally reporters are going to ask the President about his opinion of this case when they have his ear...that the President has an opinion does not make it political.

But when a pathetic, partisan message board troll like Dweebway, whose sole contribution to the discussion has been incessant repetition of how the shooter registered to vote, his comments are nothing more than a pitiful attempt to make this political.
 
crying for weeks about liberals who had Made Up Their Minds Without Knowing The Facts.

Are you denying that this is what happened......???


There can be no facts known NOW what weren't known within 10 days of the incident.....and no charges were brought against the Hispanic then....

The only thing thats different is the politics (Obama's big mouth) and public sentiment ( the whining of the left, and the racists)threatening riots and demonstrations
and revenge against whites, whites that weren't and aren't involved from the start.....

The prosecutor wanted to bring charges, something tells me that daddy Zimmerman being an ex judge had more to do with that than anything!
 
Really? What if they stab them or club them to death? Any difference in your policy? And what about sucking human beings down a tube into a collection jar, does that require we have a trial to determine guilt as well?

Oh, I'm sorry, so now the guy who wouldn't even answer a SIMPLE question from me, somehow thinks I'm going to respond to his query with anything other than humorous derision?


:rofl:


Get bent douchebag...
 
No disrespect intended but I do not agree with that. If it is a clear case of self-defense, a man comes home and see's someone raping his wife and attacking her with a knife or gun and he shoots that intruder, and the officers and DA agree the evidence all points to self-defense does that really need to go to trial?


Well then those facts would come out in the trial and the shooter would have nothing to worry about, would he?
 
Well then those facts would come out in the trial and the shooter would have nothing to worry about, would he?

It's not about protecting the shooter it's that we have an already overwhelmed court system and you want to force a trial in a situation where the police and DA after reviewing the evidence determine that the act was legitimately self-defense. It's a complete waste.
 
No disrespect intended but I do not agree with that. If it is a clear case of self-defense, a man comes home and see's someone raping his wife and attacking her with a knife or gun and he shoots that intruder, and the officers and DA agree the evidence all points to self-defense does that really need to go to trial?

Was Trayvon Martin an intruder in Zimmerman's home, raping his wife and attacking her with a knife or gun?
 
ABC news says investigators still don't know where Zimmerman is. So by this time tomorrow he could be an armed fugitive. Maybe he will turn himself in though. I guess we will find out.
 
ABC news says investigators still don't know where Zimmerman is. So by this time tomorrow he could be an armed fugitive. Maybe he will turn himself in though. I guess we will find out.

If he is out of state, he would be wise to call authorities, let them know he is coming in, but not tell them from where. Have to be careful since the racists put a bounty on his head.
 
Back
Top