Zimmerman to be Charged....

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
I dont know enough about the case to know if this is the right or wrong decision, but I am glad to see that the evidence will be forced out!
 
I dont know enough about the case to know if this is the right or wrong decision, but I am glad to see that the evidence will be forced out!

A trial at this point is the only way to handle this case for both sides.
 
Politics and public sentiment should not be enough to charge someone with a crime and make them stand trial.
 
:)

I guess now I have a link to what I posted yesterday - she never would have dismissed the grand jury if she wasn't bringing charges.

Let the weeping commence!
 
Politics and public sentiment should not be enough to charge someone with a crime and make them stand trial.

I'm sorry, but if a private citizen shoots and KILLS another human being, then a trial to determine guilt or innocence should be required.
 
LOL at the idiot dwweebway...STILL trying, like the partisan douchebag he is, to make this crime political.

When you have the President and Presidential candidates commenting on this it's pretty hard at this point, imo, to say that it's not political.
 
Politics and public sentiment should not be enough to charge someone with a crime and make them stand trial.


Thats the most intelligent I've ever heard come from you since you've been posting.....


So even before you see the evidence you are saying this?


And what do you think of the your fellow political liberals that have been denouncing Zimmerman as a murderer and guilty or staking and so
many other accusations without evidence........you've never once told them to fuck off and show some civility for him....
 
I'm sorry, but if a private citizen shoots and KILLS another human being, then a trial to determine guilt or innocence should be required.

Really? What if they stab them or club them to death? Any difference in your policy? And what about sucking human beings down a tube into a collection jar, does that require we have a trial to determine guilt as well?
 
I'm sorry, but if a private citizen shoots and KILLS another human being, then a trial to determine guilt or innocence should be required.

Guilt or innocence of what ? The killing ?.....thats not even in question, its an admitted fact.
 
I'm sorry, but if a private citizen shoots and KILLS another human being, then a trial to determine guilt or innocence should be required.

No disrespect intended but I do not agree with that. If it is a clear case of self-defense, a man comes home and see's someone raping his wife and attacking her with a knife or gun and he shoots that intruder, and the officers and DA agree the evidence all points to self-defense does that really need to go to trial?
 
No disrespect intended but I do not agree with that. If it is a clear case of self-defense, a man comes home and see's someone raping his wife and attacking her with a knife or gun and he shoots that intruder, and the officers and DA agree the evidence all points to self-defense does that really need to go to trial?

No. But there should always be an investigation. Even in the circumstances you describe, to make sure that man didn't come home and find someone else consensually fucking his wife, killed him, and the wife is covering for him. In this case there was no investigation to speak of. I am glad we had one now. If he is acquitted eventually, well, then a jury will have found him innocent. But the system needs to work.
 
Back
Top