Did he act in self-defense?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
G

Guns Guns Guns

Guest
One Goh, 43, who had been expelled from Oikos University, has been cooperative with investigators after being taken into custody but “not particularly remorseful.”

The Oikos killings came about a month after a student opened fire at a high school in Chardon, Ohio, killing three students and wounding two.



Oikos, which offers programs in theology, nursing, music and Asian medicine, describes itself on its website as having been started to provide the “highest standard education with Christian value and inspiration.”


http://www.firstpost.com/world/poli...targeted-administrator-classmates-265477.html
 
7 are now dead. Goh, after finding that his main target was not around (the administrator) lined up the students against the wall and casually executed them. No monster rampage or wild flurry of bullets, but a cold and calculated mass execution that could have been stopped had students been allowed to carry their own weapon.
 
7 are now dead. Goh, after finding that his main target was not around (the administrator) lined up the students against the wall and casually executed them. No monster rampage or wild flurry of bullets, but a cold and calculated mass execution that could have been stopped had students been allowed to carry their own weapon.

Ya that would work well in Florida! If there is a student that has been mocking you? Well just get him alone, aim and shoot. Officer we were arguing and he went for his gun so I shot him in self defense! I plead stand your ground defense!
 
Ya that would work well in Florida! If there is a student that has been mocking you? Well just get him alone, aim and shoot. Officer we were arguing and he went for his gun so I shot him in self defense! I plead stand your ground defense!
right, because there are so many more people out there looking to abuse the SYG law than need to defend themselves in a campus shooting. 1 dead vs. 7 dead. you're right. your body count is higher, therefore you win.
 
right, because there are so many more people out there looking to abuse the SYG law than need to defend themselves in a campus shooting. 1 dead vs. 7 dead. you're right. your body count is higher, therefore you win.

If people could get away with murder. I'm sure the numbers of victims would be higher then 7.
 
then obviously SYG is a good law, since you're admitting that people don't get away with murder. ready for campus carry now? or are 7 dead people still better than 1 to prevent guns on campus?

No I'm stating more murderers can claim SYG. if there is someone you really hate and you know he/she is packing? Just shoot them and say they went for their gun! Case dismissed!
 
No I'm stating more murderers can claim SYG. if there is someone you really hate and you know he/she is packing? Just shoot them and say they went for their gun! Case dismissed!
and when the police determine that the victims gun never left his holster? still self defense? or are you now just going to assume that law enforcement is that incompetent?
 
and when the police determine that the victims gun never left his holster? still self defense? or are you now just going to assume that law enforcement is that incompetent?

PFFT! I could say he reached for it(and uttered I'm going to kill you/alla zimmerman) and I shot him before he could draw his gun! I guess I have a faster draw. :) Or I can get his gun, wipe the prints and put it in his hand or near him!

And speaking of incompetent law enforcement? You have been following the Zimmerman case haven't you?
 
PFFT! I could say he reached for it(and uttered I'm going to kill you/alla zimmerman) and I shot him before he could draw his gun! I guess I have a faster draw. :) Or I can get his gun, wipe the prints and put it in his hand or near him!
while there may/will be cases like this, they will be few and far between, IMO. But then I believe as the framers did, it's better to let 10 guilty men go free than to imprison one innocent person while the majority of todays people think it's better to imprison everyone and let time sort it out later. pretty pathetic.

And speaking of incompetent law enforcement? You have been following the Zimmerman case haven't you?
you've seen me posting on it, right? While I'm damned sure to be the first one to criticize police (usually), so far the one this falls on is the prosecutor not wanting to take the case. But as time has gone on and more 'facts' have come out, it's starting to look like a legitimate case of self defense, despite whiny assed people claiming zimmerman 'stalked' martin, which is now a liberal euphemism for 'followed from a distance and lost him'.
 
and when the police determine that the victims gun never left his holster? still self defense? or are you now just going to assume that law enforcement is that incompetent?

These idiots have no idea of forensics or autopsies.
They obviously have been watching way to many crime shows and believe they're real.
 
while there may/will be cases like this, they will be few and far between, IMO. But then I believe as the framers did, it's better to let 10 guilty men go free than to imprison one innocent person while the majority of todays people think it's better to imprison everyone and let time sort it out later. pretty pathetic.

Its better to let 10 guilty men go free then to imprison one innocent? How about if those 10 guilty men kill more people?

you've seen me posting on it, right? While I'm damned sure to be the first one to criticize police (usually), so far the one this falls on is the prosecutor not wanting to take the case. But as time has gone on and more 'facts' have come out, it's starting to look like a legitimate case of self defense, despite whiny assed people claiming zimmerman 'stalked' martin, which is now a liberal euphemism for 'followed from a distance and lost him'.

I agree that the Attorney is to blame THOUGH now Wolfinger is stating that he wasn't called at all(covering his butt). It's like a Soap Opera! Lies after lies!

Still, the cops took no pictures! Never brought in any evidence, any medical reports, nothing. I call that VERY sloppy police work!

Also to me its starting to look like Zimmerman should be charged! he did stalk Martin. He said he was attacked from behind, but his dad's account says they faced each other head on and Trayvon's GF backs that testimony. So which one is it?
 
Its better to let 10 guilty men go free then to imprison one innocent? How about if those 10 guilty men kill more people?
what if YOU were that one innocent person imprisoned?

I agree that the Attorney is to blame THOUGH now Wolfinger is stating that he wasn't called at all(covering his butt). It's like a Soap Opera! Lies after lies!
wolfinger is saying he was never called? link me to that and if possible, any rebuttal from the cop that said he called him. that should be entertaining.

Still, the cops took no pictures! Never brought in any evidence, any medical reports, nothing. I call that VERY sloppy police work!
where's the claim of no pictures being taken? the gun was seized, was it not? there was at least one medical report from the paramedics on scene. has the autopsy on martin been completed? In other words, what i'm asking you is up until the DOJ and the state took over the investigation, you have verifiable proof that there was zero investigative work done?

Also to me its starting to look like Zimmerman should be charged! he did stalk Martin. He said he was attacked from behind, but his dad's account says they faced each other head on and Trayvon's GF backs that testimony. So which one is it?
all I can tell you is that it's a good thing you aren't a prosecutor or cop, because if you brought charges and tried people based on nothing more than he said/she said testimony, you're going to lose alot of cases.
 
what if YOU were that one innocent person imprisoned?

I'd rather have no guilty people set free and no innocent people be jailed.


wolfinger is saying he was never called? link me to that and if possible, any rebuttal from the cop that said he called him. that should be entertaining.


Basically saying he didn't interfere in the case at all. In regards to them not charging Zimmerman.

Here is something to think about.

"Law enforcement experts have said that is extremely unusual for a high-level official to be present in the station after a local murder on a Sunday evening.

They say it is even unusual for the chief of police to go to the murder scene on a Sunday evening, which he did."


where's the claim of no pictures being taken? the gun was seized, was it not? there was at least one medical report from the paramedics on scene. has the autopsy on martin been completed? In other words, what i'm asking you is up until the DOJ and the state took over the investigation, you have verifiable proof that there was zero investigative work done?

Nope. They gave him his gun back. Where the pictures of an injury? Whenever you are injured in an assault, the first thing the courts require is pictures(PROOF)! So far no such pictures have been released, simply because they dont exist. Though I wouldn't be surprised if they magically appeared, just like some of zimmerman's witnesses.....The medical report does not acknowledge a broken nose. There was another ambulance called to the scene but it was cancelled. I guess his wounds were minor....The body of Martin did not show any signs of him being in a scuffle.

What I'm asking is that he be charged and stand trial.

all I can tell you is that it's a good thing you aren't a prosecutor or cop, because if you brought charges and tried people based on nothing more than he said/she said testimony, you're going to lose alot of cases.

Really? The fact that Zimmerman's story doesn't support his father's account(which supporters Cutcher's account)?You don't think that is significant? I'm glad your not a judge. :)
 
I'd rather have no guilty people set free and no innocent people be jailed.
we don't live in a perfect world, nor do we have a perfect law enforcement/justice system, so it's never going to be that way.
so I ask again, in order to prevent 10 guilty men going free, are you ok with being that innocently imprisoned man?

Nope. They gave him his gun back.
I'm calling sh'nanigans on this. You KNOW i'm totally up on all the gun news, right? I've seen one statement from the brady campaign that claims zimmerman got his gun back but later backtracked that statement confirming that Sanford PD still has the gun, but then qualified his statement saying that zimmerman still has his CWL and can still buy another gun.

Where the pictures of an injury? Whenever you are injured in an assault, the first thing the courts require is pictures(PROOF)! So far no such pictures have been released, simply because they dont exist.
there is video of the head injury, or are you claiming that this video is doctored?

Though I wouldn't be surprised if they magically appeared, just like some of zimmerman's witnesses.....The medical report does not acknowledge a broken nose. There was another ambulance called to the scene but it was cancelled. I guess his wounds were minor....The body of Martin did not show any signs of him being in a scuffle.
this portion will be good evidence to construct the scenario for the jury, but will not be enough to warrant the charge, which is what the prosecutor will need.

What I'm asking is that he be charged and stand trial.

Really? The fact that Zimmerman's story doesn't support his father's account(which supporters Cutcher's account)?You don't think that is significant? I'm glad your not a judge. :)
again, he said/she said testimony. and how many cases have you seen, heard, or read about where eyewitness testimony was later proved to be wrong, inaccurate, or outright lies? No judge wants to see any of his cases overturned on appeal because of recanting witnesses. it's just too unreliable, which makes me thrilled that you're not a judge.

really, is your idea of justice charging everyyone and then making them prove they are innocent?
 
we don't live in a perfect world, nor do we have a perfect law enforcement/justice system, so it's never going to be that way.
so I ask again, in order to prevent 10 guilty men going free, are you ok with being that innocently imprisoned man?

Yes, especially if one of those guilty men is released and rapes or kills one of my loved ones.

I'm calling sh'nanigans on this. You KNOW i'm totally up on all the gun news, right? I've seen one statement from the brady campaign that claims zimmerman got his gun back but later backtracked that statement confirming that Sanford PD still has the gun, but then qualified his statement saying that zimmerman still has his CWL and can still buy another gun.

The problem is the many conflicting reports. last time I heard, they gave him his gun back. Why would they backtrack??? Why would they not suspend his CWL?

there is video of the head injury, or are you claiming that this video is doctored?

I see no significant head injury. Maybe if we do another scan under a microscope, we can find some dead scalp follicles.LOL!!!

this portion will be good evidence to construct the scenario for the jury, but will not be enough to warrant the charge, which is what the prosecutor will need.

They are saying it might not even go to jury! Sorry but there is enough evidence to contradict zimmerman's story, and enough for a charge. Even the main investigator agreed.


again, he said/she said testimony. and how many cases have you seen, heard, or read about where eyewitness testimony was later proved to be wrong, inaccurate, or outright lies? No judge wants to see any of his cases overturned on appeal because of recanting witnesses. it's just too unreliable, which makes me thrilled that you're not a judge.

really, is your idea of justice charging everyyone and then making them prove they are innocent?

Her said she said??WOW! Zimmerman gives an account that directly contradicts the one his father is claiming, and the one the father is claiming supports the testimony of a martin supporter! Whose going to recant? Zimmerman or his dad?LOL

Was he attacked from behind like zimmerman claims or was he approached face to face, punched in the nose? If you cant see the contradiction? You'd make a poor judge. One of them is lying or trying to cover up a lie.
 
Neighborhood-Watch-Program-Sign-K-1069_xthumb.jpg



Notice the complexion of the "suspicious" character?

Was the one-man judge, jury, and executioner of Trayvon Martin racist?
 
Yes, especially if one of those guilty men is released and rapes or kills one of my loved ones.
are you actually saying that you would prefer going to prison, say for life, having not committed any crime at all, so long as all guilty people never get away with a crime?

The problem is the many conflicting reports. last time I heard, they gave him his gun back. Why would they backtrack??? Why would they not suspend his CWL?[/QUOTE
the brady spokesman had to backtrack, not the sanford PD. and his permit has not been suspended because he hasn't been charged with anything.

They are saying it might not even go to jury! Sorry but there is enough evidence to contradict zimmerman's story, and enough for a charge. Even the main investigator agreed.
the main investigator is a police officer, not a prosecutor, therefore doesn't have the training or experience to know whether a conviction would be attained. He only knows that the police have charged other people for shooting someone when circumstances look the same.

Her said she said??WOW! Zimmerman gives an account that directly contradicts the one his father is claiming, and the one the father is claiming supports the testimony of a martin supporter! Whose going to recant? Zimmerman or his dad?LOL
the girlfriend, the witness, any other 911 caller. talk to a lawyer, see how often it happens.

Was he attacked from behind like zimmerman claims or was he approached face to face, punched in the nose? If you cant see the contradiction? You'd make a poor judge. One of them is lying or trying to cover up a lie.
I'd make a better judge than you, because you can't get past your bias against zimmerman. sorry, you're rush to judgement could let a guilty man go free. something you claim you don't ever want.
 
You're an idiot. The picture looks like the "criminal" has a ski mask on.

You're an apologist for racism.

The "criminal" depicted has a black face, hands and ears, and is wearing a cap, not a "ski mask".
 
Back
Top