Zimmerman - A Hispanic Registered Democrat

You cannot be serious. Insulting, but not serious.

Since when does one person have the right to stop another citizen in the street for no reason? And Zimmerman did not have a reason, because Martin walking in the rain and looking around ("It's raining, and he's just walking around looking about.") doesn't constitute suspicious behaviour.

From the transcript:

"Now he's coming towards me. He's got his hand in his waistband. And he's a black male...Something's wrong with him. Yup, he's coming to check me out. He's got something in his hands. I don't know what his deal is...These assholes, they always get away."

After discussing his location with the dispatcher, Zimmerman exclaimed, "Shit, he's running," and the following sounds suggest he left his vehicle to run after Martin.


"Are you following him?" the dispatcher asked. Zimmerman replied: "Yep."


"Okay, we don't need you to do that," the dispatcher warned.


Martin started to run and Zimmerman got out of the SUV to chase him. Why?

"Several minutes later, according to other callers to 911 in the neighborhood, Zimmerman and Martin got into a wrestling match on the ground."


It seem to me that Zimmerman went on the attack and Martin stood his ground. But we'll never know because Martin isn't here to tell his side of the story.

Irony of ironies, that you of all people are taking Zimmerman's side on this. You talk all the time about questioning authority. Yet Zimmerman was not an authority figure who Martin was compelled to obey, so what gives? Were you just looking for an opportunity to say I write stupid posts?

by official accounts and one witness who's changed his story around, it seems you would be wrong. IF zimmerman is actually the neighborhood watch captain, he has a right to follow someone who looks suspicious. I can follow anyone around that I want to as long as I remain on the public wayfares. what proof do you have that zimmerman went on the attack? I'll even give you the possibility that zimmerman DID attack and martin defended himself and was shot in doing so, but in no way, shape, or form do you have a single bit of factual evidence that either scenario happened so I didn't have to look too damned far for your post to be stupid.
 
all that shows is 73% of Americans don't give a fuck about the rule of law or a justice system. They've been brainwashed to believe that it's better to believe everyone is a criminal until proven otherwise. pretty fucking pathetic ass backwards view of what the USA is supposed to be.

No, it shows that nothing was proven in the Martin shooting because no charges were pressed.
 
by official accounts and one witness who's changed his story around, it seems you would be wrong. IF zimmerman is actually the neighborhood watch captain, he has a right to follow someone who looks suspicious. I can follow anyone around that I want to as long as I remain on the public wayfares. what proof do you have that zimmerman went on the attack? I'll even give you the possibility that zimmerman DID attack and martin defended himself and was shot in doing so, but in no way, shape, or form do you have a single bit of factual evidence that either scenario happened so I didn't have to look too damned far for your post to be stupid.

First, a neighborhood watch group doesn't have a license for vigilantism. Zimmerman didn't just follow the kid, he confronted him. And when Martin began running, Zimmerman chased him... in spite of the 911 dispatcher telling him not to do so, and that police were on the way.

Are you forgetting that Martin was legally a child? And that many parents, including me, tell their children to run away if someone is following them in a car and confronting them? You righties are just unbelievable. Two days ago you said you wouldn't let your 12-year old go to Mexico with police protection, today it appears you're saying a 17-year old shouldn't run from a stranger in a car who's following him. I think you guys just automatically come down against what liberals support, logical or not. And as far as I can see, NONE of us has a single bit of factual evidence, we're just hashing out the incident and giving opinions based on the info we do know. So your posts are just as stupid as mine, and for the same reasons.
 
First, a neighborhood watch group doesn't have a license for vigilantism. Zimmerman didn't just follow the kid, he confronted him. And when Martin began running, Zimmerman chased him... in spite of the 911 dispatcher telling him not to do so, and that police were on the way.

Are you forgetting that Martin was legally a child? And that many parents, including me, tell their children to run away if someone is following them in a car and confronting them? You righties are just unbelievable. Two days ago you said you wouldn't let your 12-year old go to Mexico with police protection, today it appears you're saying a 17-year old shouldn't run from a stranger in a car who's following him. I think you guys just automatically come down against what liberals support, logical or not. And as far as I can see, NONE of us has a single bit of factual evidence, we're just hashing out the incident and giving opinions based on the info we do know. So your posts are just as stupid as mine, and for the same reasons.

once again you're passing off speculation and opinion as fact. what proof do you have this was vigilantism?

the difference between most of the liberals posting about this and conservatives is that conservatives aren't rushing to judgment based on the color of someone's skin. we are not passing off speculation as fact and convicting him before we know what really happened.
 
First, a neighborhood watch group doesn't have a license for vigilantism. Zimmerman didn't just follow the kid, he confronted him. And when Martin began running, Zimmerman chased him... in spite of the 911 dispatcher telling him not to do so, and that police were on the way.
when will you be posting the video of this? y'all have been saying that zimmerman stalked and chased the kid down then shot him. afterwards zimmerman kicked his own ass to make it look like he was attacked first. surveillance footage exists to show this?

Are you forgetting that Martin was legally a child? And that many parents, including me, tell their children to run away if someone is following them in a car and confronting them? You righties are just unbelievable. Two days ago you said you wouldn't let your 12-year old go to Mexico with police protection, today it appears you're saying a 17-year old shouldn't run from a stranger in a car who's following him. I think you guys just automatically come down against what liberals support, logical or not. And as far as I can see, NONE of us has a single bit of factual evidence, we're just hashing out the incident and giving opinions based on the info we do know. So your posts are just as stupid as mine, and for the same reasons.
the fuck you are. you just gave a statement of exactly what happened, according to you, so i'm asking for your proof. how long should I wait?
 
when will you be posting the video of this? y'all have been saying that zimmerman stalked and chased the kid down then shot him. afterwards zimmerman kicked his own ass to make it look like he was attacked first. surveillance footage exists to show this?

the fuck you are. you just gave a statement of exactly what happened, according to you, so i'm asking for your proof. how long should I wait?

Love the way you're reframing my comments to what you think I said rather that what in fact I said. It's a typical rightie ploy when you guys are being evasive. My statements are based on what was in the 911 tapes, i.e. Zimmerman's own words.
 
Love the way you're reframing my comments to what you think I said rather that what in fact I said. It's a typical rightie ploy when you guys are being evasive. My statements are based on what was in the 911 tapes, i.e. Zimmerman's own words.
zimmerman said to the dispatcher that he was confronting the supsicious person?
 
No, the girlfriends testimony states that he questioned Martin, confronted him, and that was the last she heard from Martin.
so after zimmerman confronted martin, non violently at that time i'm guessing or the girlfriend would have said otherwise, something happened to cause zimmerman to head back towards his car and martin to attack him from behind. or are you going to stick with the insane notion that stopping someone to ask them who they are is stalking?
 
so after zimmerman confronted martin, non violently at that time i'm guessing or the girlfriend would have said otherwise, something happened to cause zimmerman to head back towards his car and martin to attack him from behind. or are you going to stick with the insane notion that stopping someone to ask them who they are is stalking?

If you were walking down the street and a complete stranger asked who you are, I'll bet your answer wouldn't be "my name is STY and I live on 1313 Mockingbird Lane".

If it were me, I'd respond with "who are you and why do you want to know?"
 
No, the girlfriends testimony states that he questioned Martin, confronted him, and that was the last she heard from Martin.

You liar!!

The phone call shows Martin being the first one to ask a question.
Why are you bending this, unless you're afraid that Martin might just be the guilty one.
 
Back
Top