liberals don't care about black men, just the agenda

That would have been the logical course of action, however, even following someone around does not entitle the individual being followed to launch a pre-emptive strike.

But you yourself just said you have the right to shoot and kill someone for merely THREATENING to hit you...isn't that the ultimate "pre-emptive strike"?
 
But you yourself just said you have the right to shoot and kill someone for merely THREATENING to hit you...isn't that the ultimate "pre-emptive strike"?


Do you equate someone following another person with someone threatening you ?.......The difference escapes you ?

Thats like claiming a person staring at you constitutes a threat......Isn't there some grown up in your life that can explain things to you ? Its better than getting pwned every day.
 
Do you equate someone following another person with someone threatening you ?.......The difference escapes you ?

Thats like claiming a person staring at you constitutes a threat......Isn't there some grown up in your life that can explain things to you ? Its better than getting pwned every day.

Personally I don't, but it's obvious pretty much anyone with a CCL would probably consider being followed as "threatening".

The same goes for someone staring at me from across the room...not a big threat to me. But someone so scared they need to strap on a hog leg like Wyatt Earp or Dirty Harry might perceive a steely, unblinking stare from across the room as threatening.
 
Personally I don't, but it's obvious pretty much anyone with a CCL would probably consider being followed as "threatening".

The same goes for someone staring at me from across the room...not a big threat to me. But someone so scared they need to strap on a hog leg like Wyatt Earp or Dirty Harry might perceive a steely, unblinking stare from across the room as threatening.

that makes it pretty obvious you don't have a clue about people who carry guns.
 
Personally I don't, but it's obvious pretty much anyone with a CCL would probably consider being followed as "threatening".

The same goes for someone staring at me from across the room...not a big threat to me. But someone so scared they need to strap on a hog leg like Wyatt Earp or Dirty Harry might perceive a steely, unblinking stare from across the room as threatening.

Ah, that would be STY.
 
Personally I don't, but it's obvious pretty much anyone with a CCL would probably consider being followed as "threatening".

The same goes for someone staring at me from across the room...not a big threat to me. But someone so scared they need to strap on a hog leg like Wyatt Earp or Dirty Harry might perceive a steely, unblinking stare from across the room as threatening.


Well, the law doesn't.....and that is the only thing that really counts......following someone or staring at someone doesn't constitute a threat......
and it follows that you do not have a right to attack or shoot or hit someone for that reason......got that ?

You have no right to attack or shoot or hit someone for following you.....
And you do not have to wait to get hit by an attacker before you defend yourself...................any questions ?
 
Back
Top