Green energy harming the environment

There is a point in the future where it HAS to get better & more economical. I suspect you & I might disagree on that point.

Regardless, I have endless faith in American ingenuity & preserverance. I find the celebration of certain green energy failures on this board laughable; every technology since the inception of the wheel has had failures & naysayers at its start.

So why have you steadfastly ignored the benefits of thorium based reactors?


http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-09/16/a-nuclear-future
 
still running away from your claim i hate green energy....good little boy. and i give you intelligent points all the time, you however, constantly derail threads with your whiny ad homs.

tell me what is not "smart" about post 9...

Post 9 WAS ad homs, Yurtsie. Can you even hear yourself? Everything about post 9 was not smart. YOU are not smart.

Where are you threads about green tech? Where are your threads encouraging alternative energy development? You just go for these bitchy little gotcha threads - hey, lefties! You're killing the eagles! Haha - it ain't for the environment after all.

I swear - it is so utterly predictable & boring.
 
that is true now. but, with advance in technology this will likely change. oil is cheaper at this point, however, the cost to the environment must also be factored in. not only that, but geopolitics. i believe we need to change our dependence on oil and increase research into alternative or green energy. but, we also don't need to fear monger "non" green energy. we need to be realistic in our approach to energy issues.

Post 9 WAS ad homs, Yurtsie. Can you even hear yourself? Everything about post 9 was not smart. YOU are not smart.

Where are you threads about green tech? Where are your threads encouraging alternative energy development? You just go for these bitchy little gotcha threads - hey, lefties! You're killing the eagles! Haha - it ain't for the environment after all.

I swear - it is so utterly predictable & boring.

where are the ad homs onceler? what do you not agree with or think is not smart. be specific.
 
I get that you're beholden to the oil industry. Frankly, it's the one area in politics/economics where you do not think rationally on this board.

Yes, Dude - oil is what is considered a finite resource.

Hate to break it to ya....
Not shocking coming from a libtard. Let me know when you are fossil fuel free, until then hypocrit on and say thank you once in a while you tool.
 
i wonder if onceler will jump on you for you ad hom....lol...oh wait, you're a lefty

your post is a strawman. no one is saying oil doesn't harm the environment.


Hilarious. Your OP invited the comparison, dipshit. And since you're playing the strawman game (albeit baselessly) why don't you quote a lefty environmentalist who claims that wind power is not harmful to the environment.
 
Hilarious. Your OP invited the comparison, dipshit. And since you're playing the strawman game (albeit baselessly) why don't you quote a lefty environmentalist who claims that wind power is not harmful to the environment.

your post clearly indicated someone believes oil doesn't harm the environment. that is a strawman.

there are numerous uber lefties who claim green energy doesn't harm the environment. that you deny it is what is hilarious. you claim i throwing out a strawman but that is false, you're only upset because you got called out for another strawman.

are you for or against the alaska pipe or the pipeline obama rejected?
 
your post clearly indicated someone believes oil doesn't harm the environment. that is a strawman.

there are numerous uber lefties who claim green energy doesn't harm the environment. that you deny it is what is hilarious. you claim i throwing out a strawman but that is false, you're only upset because you got called out for another strawman.

are you for or against the alaska pipe or the pipeline obama rejected?


No, my post didn't indicate anything or the sort. My post was merely a response to your dumbass insinuation the wind is not less harmful to the environment than oil. So, piss up a rope with your strawman bullshit.

And if those environmentalist wackos are so numerous, you ought to be able to quote one or two, hotshot.
 
No, my post didn't indicate anything or the sort. My post was merely a response to your dumbass insinuation the wind is not less harmful to the environment than oil. So, piss up a rope with your strawman bullshit.

And if those environmentalist wackos are so numerous, you ought to be able to quote one or two, hotshot.

u mad

yours truly,

dunceler

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&safe=o....,cf.osb&fp=2f95c0d86315f210&biw=1280&bih=603

i will offer an addendum to "usually" doesn't harm the environment. i have read some far left wackos who claim it doesn't harm the environment.
 
i have no problem with energy conservation or green energy. i just can't stand the uber left enviro wackos who spout that green energy is not harmful to the environment.

How many lifeforms were killed in the gulf oil spill?
 
Back
Top