Is Sandra Fluke a slut?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date

Is Sandra Fluke a slut?

  • Yes

    Votes: 4 40.0%
  • No

    Votes: 6 60.0%

  • Total voters
    10
why should religious institutions be forced to do something that violates their religious beliefs?

We have an ongoing debate in the UK about Catholic adoption agencies being forced to allow homosexual couples to adopt children. They have mostly chosen to shut down rather than be confronted with law suits. I am actually on their side, they did a great deal of good and they shouldn't be penalised for their views.
 
Blabo says Ms. Fluke is a slut because she fits the definition of one, but can't explain how...


That would be so cool......I can't wait to hear the slut on the witness stand telling the world about her sex life.....and then of course the men will have to testify too.....what a circus.....gonna be fun....

Thesaurus

Noun...

slut - a dirty untidy woman

slut (slt)
n.

2. A slovenly woman; a slattern.


slov·en·ly (slvn-l)
adj.
1. Untidy, as in dress or appearance.
2. Marked by negligence; slipshod.

slat·tern (sltrn)
n.
An untidy, dirty woman


Noun
1.
slut - a dirty untidy woman





In my opinion, exercising my right under the First Amendment, Fluke is dirty, unitdy woman......i.e....a slut

Case fuckin' closed.

Poor Blabo.
 
I find this whole debate to be seriously crazy, if a woman ended up pregnant surely that would be far more expensive for the health insurance companies?


Thats probably why 9 out of 10 do cover it.....
and that is not the point.....
The point is , should a religious group, that has been historically against artificial birth control, be FORCED by the state to ignore that centuries old doctrine and obey the state......
in violation of the US Constitution....


The 'debate' is smoke and mirrors to confuse the people as to the real issue, the Constitution.
 
We have an ongoing debate in the UK about Catholic adoption agencies being forced to allow homosexual couples to adopt children. They have mostly chosen to shut down rather than be confronted with law suits. I am actually on their side, they did a great deal of good and they shouldn't be penalised for their views.

It's not merely their views - it's their religiously (dogmatically) held beliefs. Here is an article that I think sheds a decent light onto the subject of the divide. It is not a matter of agreeing- but a matter of accepting that an opposite view is held. I think one very insightful aspect is that tolerance for opposing views and respect of that, must go both ways.
 
Last edited:
It's not merely their views - it's their religiously (dogmatically) held beliefs. Here is an article that I thinks sheds a decent light onto the subject of the divide. It is not a matter of agreeing- but a matter of accepting that an opposite view is held. I think one very insightful aspect is that tolerance for opposing views and respect of that, must go both ways.

Does calling Sandra Fluke a slut embody that respect?
 
Thats probably why 9 out of 10 do cover it.....and that is not the point.....The point is , should a religious group, that has been historically against artificial birth control, be FORCED by the state to ignore that centuries old doctrine and obey the state......in violation of the US Constitution....
The 'debate' is smoke and mirrors to confuse the people as to the real issue, the Constitution.

Take it to court, Blabo.

You lost in the Senate.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/201...ate-and-public-support-birth-control-coverage

BTW, would you defend a state-mandated intrusion on the rights of Muslims?
 
then i think you need to take that up with him, don't you? or do you believe that making general comments about 'righties' on this board will make everything better?

I've given the "righties" on the board literally dozens of chances to distance themselves from Rush. Instead, most have opted for apologism, and agreeing that Fluke is somehow a "slut."

So there.
 
Back
Top