Pat Robertson Calls For Relaxed Marijuana Possession Laws

There was a study done in 2002 by the British Lung Foundation which stated that smoking pure cannabis is just as harmful as tobacco and may be a good deal worse.

Cannabis smoking 'more harmful' than tobacco


Smoking pure marijuana is at least as harmful to lungs as smoking tobacco, a report from the British Lung Foundation concludes. And in some key ways, it may be more dangerous. For example, the BLF's review of previous research highlights that just three marijuana joints a day causes the same damage to the lung's airways as 20 cigarettes, mainly because of the way joints are smoked. Individually, cannabis and tobacco produce the same constituents and quantities of chemicals known to be toxic to respiratory tissue, other than nicotine, the report says. But when cannabis and tobacco are smoked together, the health effects are worse.

"These statistics will come as a surprise to many people, especially those who choose to smoke cannabis rather than tobacco in the belief it is safer for them," says Mark Britton, chairman of the BLF. A UK survey conducted earlier in 2002 found that 79 per cent of children believed cannabis to be 'safe'.

Deep breath


A key finding highlighted by the review of 90 published papers is that the amount of smoke taken into the lungs is two thirds larger if cannabis is being smoked. The smoke is also taken one third deeper into the lungs - and that smoke is held an average of four times longer before being exhaled.
"You inhale deeper and hold your breath with the smoke for longer before exhaling. This results in more poisonous carbon monoxide and tar entering into the lungs," says Helena Shovelton, BLF's chief executive. Other points in the report include:

• Tar from cannabis cigarettes contains up to 50 per cent higher concentrations of carcinogens benzathracenes and benzpyrenes than tobacco smoke
• THC, the primary psychoactive ingredient of cannabis, decreases the function of immune system cells that help protect the lungs from infection
• The average cannabis cigarette smoked in the 1960s contained about 10 milligrams of tetrahydrocanabinol (THC), the primary psychoactive ingredient. Today, it may contain 150 mg.

"This means that the modern cannabis smoker may be exposed to greater doses of THC than in the 1960s or 1970s," says the report. "This in turn means that studies investigating the long-term effects of smoking cannabis have to be interpreted cautiously."

Mouth spray


Cannabis is the most widely consumed illegal drug in the UK. In 2000, almost 45 per cent of 16 to 29 year olds in the UK said they had used cannabis at some point.
"We are not making any policy recommendations. The aim of this report is to try to inform the public that if you do choose to smoke cannabis, be aware of the health risks," says a BLF spokeswoman. Cannabis-based medicines could be prescribed for medical use in the UK as early as 2003, following the recent success of final-stage trials. But medicinal cannabis is supplied through a mouth spray or in tablet form.

"We have always been keen to find additional ways of administering cannabis as a medicine," says Nina Booth-Clibborn of the UK's Medicinal Cannabis Research Foundation. "It did seem that smoking would not be the best way." Lyndon Pugh, editor of pro-cannabis magazine CC Newz, is not impressed by the report: "These allegations have been made before countless times. Lot of things are dangerous, like driving."
 
Even with a study like that, not many smokers would smoke even as many as 3 joints a day, unless you wanted to just be a coach potato or something.

It's just for effect. You wouldn't have near the #'s that you have with cigarette smoking & lung cancer.
 
Even with a study like that, not many smokers would smoke even as many as 3 joints a day, unless you wanted to just be a coach potato or something.

It's just for effect. You wouldn't have near the #'s that you have with cigarette smoking & lung cancer.

Not only that, but I don't hold my breath or take bigger deeper hits either, but then I am somewhat of a moderate.
 
So stop being lazy and cite a newer study, not much to ask.
Listen dork, I do so frequently. I will not harsh my cool by abiding the uncool. The dude abides but karma's a bitch.
No intelligent person believes pot is more harmful than beer. You can remove all doubt for us by declaring it so!
 
Not only that, but I don't hold my breath or take bigger deeper hits either, but then I am somewhat of a moderate.
There are studies showing pot fights tumors. Smoking anything isn't helpfull to lungs. But no one said it was. Tom like most Brits has the personality of a dishrag.
 
There are studies showing pot fights tumors. Smoking anything isn't helpfull to lungs. But no one said it was. Tom like most Brits has the personality of a dishrag.

I point out some research on effects of smoking cannabis on the lungs and you indulge in your usual insults, you are an arrogant sonofabitch at times.
 
You must have slept through the hundreds of positive articles I've posted. I consider myself an educated activist. And I don't suffer fools like you Brit-tool!
 
We Southerners export cancer the world over, to any stupid sonofabitch willing to buy. We'd be happy to sell them dope as well.
 
that is exactly what i said and you said that was not true. you called me a liar for that...

again....how is his stance on marijuana hypocritical if he CHANGED his view on it?

Since everything he does is hypocritical, how could he advocate weed unless he stopped being hypocritical? Are you a moron?
 
Back
Top