Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/27/b...ases-media-equation.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper
one of which....
Curious... could someone please show me how saying 'we could save money and avoid privacy issues' is equitable to espionage?
Got to love this 'open and transparent' administration. Chicago politics at its finest ladies and gents.
The Espionage Act, enacted back in 1917 to punish those who gave aid to our enemies, was used three times in all the prior administrations to bring cases against government officials accused of providing classified information to the media. It has been used six times since the current president took office. ...
one of which....
In one of the more remarkable examples of the administration’s aggressive approach, Thomas A. Drake, a former employee of the National Security Agency, was prosecuted under the Espionage Act last year and faced a possible 35 years in prison.
His crime? When his agency was about to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on a software program bought from the private sector intended to monitor digital data, he spoke with a reporter at The Baltimore Sun. He suggested an internally developed program that cost significantly less would be more effective and not violate privacy in the way the product from the vendor would. (He turned out to be right, by the way.)
He was charged with 10 felony counts that accused him of lying to investigators and obstructing justice. Last summer, the case against him collapsed, and he pleaded guilty to a single misdemeanor, of misuse of a government computer.
Jesselyn Radack, the director for national security and human rights at the Government Accountability Project, was one of the lawyers who represented him.
“The Obama administration has been quite hypocritical about its promises of openness, transparency and accountability,” she said. “All presidents hate leaks, but pursuing whistle-blowers as spies is heavy-handed and beyond the scope of the law.”
Curious... could someone please show me how saying 'we could save money and avoid privacy issues' is equitable to espionage?
Got to love this 'open and transparent' administration. Chicago politics at its finest ladies and gents.