Sex outside of marriage?

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Who here belives that sex without marriage is always a bad thing?

Who here has ever had a good experience with sex without marriage?
 
Who here belives that sex without marriage is always a bad thing?

Who here has ever had a good experience with sex without marriage?

I do. I joke a lot but I believe laws should be passed banning sex outside marriage. Nothing positive comes from it. In fact I'm willing to go so far as we should return to cutting off women's clitoris's because it is scientifically proven men cannot turn down women and if women get no sexual pleasure at all we will stop this sexual tension between the sexes.

And as you showed yesterday when you make a statement this stupid there is a point you are trying to make from something that happened 20 years ago why don't you share what that point is up front?
 
Who here belives that sex without marriage is always a bad thing?

Who here has ever had a good experience with sex without marriage?
I can't remember having any bad experience with sex inside or outside of marriage.......though there was this one time when I had Superfreak bent over a chair and was trying to give him a reach around and.........but that's probably TMI.

Or to quote the late great George Carlin. "Sex is like pizza. When it's good it's very, very good and when it's bad it's still pretty darned good!"
 
I can't remember have any bad experience with sex inside or outside of marriage.......though there was this one time when I had Superfreak bent over a chair and was trying to give him a reach around and.........but that's probably TMI.

Don't worry dude, that video is already playing in the Off Topic forum.
 
I do. I joke a lot but I believe laws should be passed banning sex outside marriage. Nothing positive comes from it. In fact I'm willing to go so far as we should return to cutting off women's clitoris's because it is scientifically proven men cannot turn down women and if women get no sexual pleasure at all we will stop this sexual tension between the sexes.

And as you showed yesterday when you make a statement this stupid there is a point you are trying to make from something that happened 20 years ago why don't you share what that point is up front?
Man! Who pissed in your Post Toasties this morning?
 
I do. I joke a lot but I believe laws should be passed banning sex outside marriage. Nothing positive comes from it. In fact I'm willing to go so far as we should return to cutting off women's clitoris's because it is scientifically proven men cannot turn down women and if women get no sexual pleasure at all we will stop this sexual tension between the sexes.

Did you know that they actually do that in some African countries? It's one of the worst things I've heard. I actually came close to throwing up when I first read about it...
 
Did you know that they actually do that in some African countries? It's one of the worst things I've heard. I actually came close to throwing up when I first read about it...

Yeah, I remember reading about it. One of the most barbaric and inhumane things... ugghhh. Making my stomach ill right now.
 
I know Jarod is fishing for something here but I can't resist. I have made my views in this area clear on this board many times and they are right in line with Santorum's as far as pre-marital sex ... but not birth control. That is why he is so appealing to social conservatives. I still think he is the Mike Huckabee of the race and you'll see an un-electable Romney win out the R nod in the end then Obama will be president for another 4 years. I don't think any of these guys can beat Obama if things don't nose-dive (and i don't want them to) but that doesn't speak to the policies of Obama being so readily accepted and grandoise, IMO, but to the weakness of the republicans in the field. One's too rich (I'm sorry, that will be a detriment to Romney in the general), one's too poor (latecomer Santorum can't raise nearly enough money), one's too "out there" in certain policy (Ron Paul), and one's just a cheater and a nut (yep, that's Gingrich).
 
I know Jarod is fishing for something here but I can't resist. I have made my views in this area clear on this board many times and they are right in line with Santorum's as far as pre-marital sex ... but not birth control. That is why he is so appealing to social conservatives. I still think he is the Mike Huckabee of the race and you'll see an un-electable Romney win out the R nod in the end then Obama will be president for another 4 years. I don't think any of these guys can beat Obama if things don't nose-dive (and i don't want them to) but that doesn't speak to the policies of Obama being so readily accepted and grandoise, IMO, but to the weakness of the republicans in the field. One's too rich (I'm sorry, that will be a detriment to Romney in the general), one's too poor (latecomer Santorum can't raise nearly enough money), one's too "out there" in certain policy (Ron Paul), and one's just a cheater and a nut (yep, that's Gingrich).
So ok....we know where you stand on premarital sex.....but where do you stand on sheep?
 
Personally I think sex outside of marriage is bad but shouldn't fall under the category of illegal, like calling somebody a worthless prick who should have been tied in a sack with a brick and thrown into the river as a child. Wrong, yes. However trying to enforce a ban on marital infidelity, with as many strange practices as there are out there, would result in everything from absurdity to gross invasions of privacy. Gross in every sense of the word ;)
 
I was lucky enough to have been a young man before AIDs was an issue. I can say that I thoroughly enjoyed getting laid. (Mott, you stole my reply by posting the Carlin line)

Whether in marriage or out, having a deep emotional bond definitally make the sex better.

But it is not for the gov't to decide.
 
I do. I joke a lot but I believe laws should be passed banning sex outside marriage. Nothing positive comes from it. In fact I'm willing to go so far as we should return to cutting off women's clitoris's because it is scientifically proven men cannot turn down women and if women get no sexual pleasure at all we will stop this sexual tension between the sexes.

And as you showed yesterday when you make a statement this stupid there is a point you are trying to make from something that happened 20 years ago why don't you share what that point is up front?

No no no dumbass... this time he is referring to something that happened in 1834. You fucking idiot.
 
There is a long, long history of sex being both discouraged & prevented based on little but fear. Some guys in particular have a thing where they feel threatened by a woman's ability to have that experience. It's almost like it feels too good to be right - it has to be "wrong" or a sin or whatever. Sexual jealousy also plays a big part in that.

The whole idea that God - this timeless, omniscient being - thinks sex is a sin or wrong (premarital or not), is completely ridiculous to me. It's one of those instances where it's clear that the Bible was written by men, and men who had their own agendas.
 
There is a long, long history of sex being both discouraged & prevented based on little but fear. Some guys in particular have a thing where they feel threatened by a woman's ability to have that experience. It's almost like it feels too good to be right - it has to be "wrong" or a sin or whatever. Sexual jealousy also plays a big part in that.

The whole idea that God - this timeless, omniscient being - thinks sex is a sin or wrong (premarital or not), is completely ridiculous to me. It's one of those instances where it's clear that the Bible was written by men, and men who had their own agendas.

We STILL have negative stigmas associated it with sex outside the marriage. Especially for women. Sex is 100% natural... the whole 'one partner' thing was just a control mechanism.
 
Back
Top