Match.com Users Political Survey

General Sheridan said:
It's really not too hard to get any particular woman into bed, regardless of religious conviction or politcal affliation. The quality of time though, I will say, is significantly different. Liberal women tend to be very boring.
Click to expand...

after 37 years of marriage I will say it isn't hard to get a woman into bed.....it's just hard to get her to do anything except sleep once she's there.......
 
Darla said:
See, the original story about the android users was funny because it was not gendered. It was about android users. I thought it particularly funny because I just bought an iphone and I was like, boy I'm glad I didn't get the slutphone! A joke about men putting out on the first date is funny because it subverts sexual stereotypes and the cultural tradition of slut-shaming.

Getting into a big ole conversation about girls putting out is just...more of the same.
Click to expand...
It's hypocritical as hell double standard too. I don't think nothing intimidates insecure males more then a confident and sexually liberated woman.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
I agree. I thinkthat whether you are sexually promiscuous or not is an individual characteristic thing. It's part of someones nature. Just like some people are right handed and some people are left. I doubt politics or religion have much to do with that.
Click to expand...

I think it's also circumstances.

But as far as all of them talking about what kind of people are good or bad in bed, I think that's so stupid. To me that is announcing you've never had great sex. Because great sex is NOT about technique, being freaky, genital size, or any of that crap. Anyone who has any experience with great sex knows what I'm talking about - it happens when the right two people meet. Some people will never have it. But they'll think they do. lol

Honestly, I know they think they are hot shit, but they sound like sexual infants to me. Whatever. I wouldn't even bother to comment except that you know how I am!
 
Darla said:
I find this hard to believe. It too closely tracks the pornified male fantasy/stereotype of the horny catholic girl in the knee socks who just needs to be scurried away from her watchers. I highly doubt that political ideology effects how fast someone gets sexual. That is most often determined by circumstances. However, I definitely do believe that your own preconceived notions (liberal girls = easy con girls = no until there's a ring) affected your perception of how fast, or how slow, there was a sexual relationship.
Click to expand...

Actually it makes total sense. Religion conditions people to subjugate themselves and sacrifice everything for their perceived alpha abuser.
 
Darla said:
I think it's also circumstances.

But as far as all of them talking about what kind of people are good or bad in bed, I think that's so stupid. To me that is announcing you've never had great sex. Because great sex is NOT about technique, being freaky, genital size, or any of that crap. Anyone who has any experience with great sex knows what I'm talking about - it happens when the right two people meet. Some people will never have it. But they'll think they do. lol

Honestly, I know they think they are hot shit, but they sound like sexual infants to me. Whatever. I wouldn't even bother to comment except that you know how I am!
Click to expand...
I'd like to think great sex is about chemistry but then again...I'm baised....I'm a chemist. :)
 
Darla said:
I think it's also circumstances.

But as far as all of them talking about what kind of people are good or bad in bed, I think that's so stupid. To me that is announcing you've never had great sex. Because great sex is NOT about technique, being freaky, genital size, or any of that crap. Anyone who has any experience with great sex knows what I'm talking about - it happens when the right two people meet. Some people will never have it. But they'll think they do. lol

Honestly, I know they think they are hot shit, but they sound like sexual infants to me. Whatever. I wouldn't even bother to comment except that you know how I am!
Click to expand...
You've reminded me of a story of this young red neck I worked with a long time ago. He was bragging at work about what a stud he was, that he was a "big man" and how he had used his big tool to really tear up his date that weekend and he kept repeating how "He had really tore her up!".

After he had went on bragging for a while about how he had "tore her up" I finally said "Shit son, unless your Johnson weighs 7lb 10 oz you didn't do shit!".

All the guys except him hit the floor laughing and he literally had to be restrained from kicking my ass. Go figure?
 
Darla said:
http://jezebel.com/5882803/new-dati...ans-care-about-money-democrats-care-about-sex

Interesting match.com survey on republican vs democratic online daters.

Few surprises here. Republican men are boring and want to talk about their money. You should wear a high-necked blouse and greet them with "hello, how is your money this week?" if you are looking to score with one of them. Why you would be looking to score with one of them is beyond me, unless you are unable to support yourself, and hey, a girl's gotta eat, so go for it.

Liberal democratic men are turned on if their date is opinionated. Need I say more? That's a good trait in a man.

And apparently, android users are the most likely to put out on the first date across the board and regardless of gender.
Click to expand...

Funny how you altered the actual survey a bit. I think out of all of the above, only one was accurate.
 
General Burnside said:
Don't get me wrong, I had no objections...but, on the other hand, a girl who sucks dick on the first date probably isn't the sort I'd settle down with.
Click to expand...

I dono, I had a girlfriend who sucked dick on the first date, but I had known her for over a year as friends.
 
Darla said:
I find this hard to believe. It too closely tracks the pornified male fantasy/stereotype of the horny catholic girl in the knee socks who just needs to be scurried away from her watchers. I highly doubt that political ideology effects how fast someone gets sexual. That is most often determined by circumstances. However, I definitely do believe that your own preconceived notions (liberal girls = easy con girls = no until there's a ring) affected your perception of how fast, or how slow, there was a sexual relationship.
Click to expand...

You may have a point, but the more she put on about how conservative she is and the more she talked about "Family Values" the quicker she was to get at it when she was sure nobody would find out.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
I agree. I thinkthat whether you are sexually promiscuous or not is an individual characteristic thing. It's part of someones nature. Just like some people are right handed and some people are left. I doubt politics or religion have much to do with that.
Click to expand...

It may be that those who are vocal about there conservative values are compensating for uncontrollable hornyness.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Let me guess.....you own an android? :)
Click to expand...

LOL Superfreak is easy! No seriously SF I don't know what I got wrong? It said liberal democratic men consider opinionated women a turnon, that con men like conservative dress in women, and the android thing was linked in the jezebel comment section, also a match.com survey. But you know, no need to be touchy, it's not science. I mean, its not like there is a consensus! Lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top