Barack Hussein betrays Israel

Why would Obama's Defense Secretary Leon Panetta tell the uber left, anti-Israel NY Times that Israel is going to strike Iran in April, May or June -- before Iran enters a “zone of immunity” to commence building a nuclear bomb?

This is the act of a friend? An acquaintance? A neutral party? Or an enemy of freedom?

Why would anyone in his rational mind give a devout jihadist regime a heads up?

As the point of no return draws closer:

"Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said Thursday that time was running out for action against the Iranian nuclear program before it became immune to physical attack, and that dealing with a nuclear Iran would be more difficult than stopping its drive to build an atomic bomb."

Why would the Obama administration betray our closest ally in The Middle East?

Once again, Obama sides with our mortal enemies, a cornerstone of his foreign policy



Barack%20Obama%2038%20in%20turban.jpg



http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/

My god! Are there still loonies that have not yet been banged up in America? Or are you out just for the day?
If you are an ordinary poster, you are a twat. If, as yurt thinks, you are legion troll, you are still a twat.
 
I'm speaking of the US in general, I personally think Israeli situation is our fault(the west) and the fault of the Israelis and all the bloodshed in that area is on those two groups hands. Israel has decided that it can screw whoever it wants whenever it wants and nobody will do anything about it. Example, the bombing of a civilian scientist in Iran when they strapped a bomb to his car and blew him sky high. Muslims doing that is extremist and terrorist but when the Israelis do it its just politics. I'm tired of seeing them get a free pass on warmongering and war crimes just because of what Germany did 70 years ago.

I saw that CT also; but maybe you could show me some proof that is was the Isrealis' that blew him up/
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
No, it's because Israel is a strategic location for launching an offensive measure in the region.....an attitude born of the old Cold War days that was started right after the end of WWII.

The real question is, will Americans be willing to start a DRAFT to cover the action should this whole nonsense start? Mind you, the powers that be can now paint everything as AL QAEDA or yell 9/11 and most of the populace would be lemming off the cliff.

I sincerely hope not.

What offensive measures do we need to launch? Need being the operative word, not "want" to launch, need. I say again, stop invading the middle east. It's not your sandbox.

I never advocated that it was America's "sandbox".....no more so that it's not France's or England or Russia, etc., etc. Re-read my last sentence.

Again, the mentality I was referreing to was born of the old Cold War days....remember, you had a couple of countries in that region were part of the Soviet block/sphere. Now, it's STILL about controlling the oil in the region/having major access to it (remember the Caspian Sea pipeline?). Israel may be an ethnic/religious thing with Jews all over the world, but for the US, it's ALWAYS been about the Benjamins.
 
Back
Top