Obama's economic record

Cancel 2018. 3

<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
399666_2808435344052_1653777590_2441712_630257926_n.jpg
 
it is accurate right now. but i know you are so desperate to apologize for him...

Nah; I could care less. It's not like you & the previous guy.

But, the extent of the economic knowledge of some on the site is sometimes bothersome.
 
Nah; I could care less. It's not like you & the previous guy.

But, the extent of the economic knowledge of some on the site is sometimes bothersome.

you immediately jumped right in to defend him and deflect off his current economic record to some ethereal point in the future.....and you claim you're not apologizing for him? lmao. you care very much about defending obama.
 
you immediately jumped right in to defend him and deflect off his current economic record to some ethereal point in the future.....and you claim you're not apologizing for him? lmao. you care very much about defending obama.

Nothing I said defended him; you're projecting again, and also having a hard time reading.

But seriously - your understanding of economics is the real issue. Unfortunately, I've read a lot of your posts on the subject. Like many other issues, you just don't know shite about it.
 
right...so once again onceler desperately tries to distract from obama's current economic record.

anyway...back to the thread
 
Does it bother you that you know so little about how the economy works?

you know that is not true. why are you still trying to desperately deflect away from obama's economic record? are you really that embarrassed? what do you have to say about his economic record? or are you just going to do your usual dishonest ad homs?
 
which is only one million less than we lost in the same period.....oops, forgot to mention that, didn't you......

Or that many of those jobs were part time and or temporary- New numbers will be coming out soon to reflect more seasonal layoffs from the holiday season. Wonder what the spin will be then?
 
which is only one million less than we lost in the same period.....oops, forgot to mention that, didn't you......

You forget... when Dems speak economics, they only include periods in which they do well. The down times are always the fault of the Republicans or Europeans or the middle East or Russia or China.... but never ever ever is it due to the failed policies of the Dems.
 
It takes time to correct 30 years of failed conservative economic policies, especially with a do-nothing, obstructionist House that see their funding gone down the toilet if they do anything to improve the situation for the middle class. The strategy on the right is to drive this country into the dirt, redistribute the wealth to the top 1% and then try blame it on the left.

Ain't gonna work.

You radical rightwingnuts should start saving some $ for anger management and therapy, after the next election you're gonna need it.
 
It takes time to correct 30 years of failed conservative economic policies, especially with a do-nothing, obstructionist House that see their funding gone down the toilet if they do anything to improve the situation for the middle class. The strategy on the right is to drive this country into the dirt, redistribute the wealth to the top 1% and then try blame it on the left.

Ain't gonna work.

You radical rightwingnuts should start saving some $ for anger management and therapy, after the next election you're gonna need it.

LOL... what failed policies are those? The ones where the US dominated global economics? The ones where even our poor improved their positions on the whole? I know you far left wing lunatics love to obsess about the top 1%, but your are delusional in your views of the right. But do show us evidence of this 'redistribution' to the top 1% that you speak of. What policies are you referring to?
 
Are you being intentionally stupid or are you really that unaware?

In 1992 Perot explained what would happen if we continued the conservative agenda. His predictions have come true.

 
Back
Top