Obama Backs Fracking to Create 600,000 Jobs, Vows Safe Drilling

cawacko

Well-known member
I'm not all that familiar with fracking. Is this a good or bad thing and how does it differ from the pipeline in terms of the envirnoment?



President Barack Obama, in a State of the Union address delivered 11 months before election day, pushed drilling for natural gas in shale formations as a potential boost to the economy.

Hydraulic fracturing, which injects a mix of water, sand and chemicals underground to free gas trapped in rock, could create 600,000 jobs by the end of the decade, according to a White House document released before Obama's speech. The process, called fracking, is among a list of energy policies Obama said would fuel economic growth.

"We have a supply of natural gas that can last America nearly one hundred years, and my Administration will take every possible action to safely develop this energy," Obama will say, according to a copy of the speech released by the White House.

Obama also reiterated support for conservation and cleaner sources of power, which have been themes of his administration. He announced incentives to make industries more energy efficient, and reiterated his call for Congress to a larger percentage of the nation's power comes from low-pollution sources by 2035.

"This country needs an all-out, all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy - a strategy that's cleaner, cheaper, and full of new jobs," Obama planned to say.


'Safe Drilling'


Environmental groups that are a key Democratic constituency fear natural-gas fracking poses risks to water supplies, and Obama said the drive for new drilling would be accompanied by regulations to ensure "safe drilling practices." Those would include a requirement that companies operating on public lands disclose the chemicals used in the fracking fluid.

Obama's energy themes were part of a speech that emphasized the role of manufacturing in creating jobs and he pressed Congress to adopt what he said was a fairer tax code by ensuring millionaires and billionaires pay at least 30 percent in income taxes.

Before the address, Republicans sought to contrast Obama's pledge to use energy policy to create jobs with his denial of a permit to TransCanada Corp. for the $7 billion Keystone XL pipeline to connect Canada's oil sands to refineries on the U.S. Gulf coast.

House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, invited Jay Churchill, manager of ConocoPhillips' Wood River refinery in Roxana, Illinois, and Ray Brooks, refining division manager at Marathon Petroleum Corp. in Robinson, Illinois, as his guests to sit in the House visitors' gallery.


Canada Pipeline


He said in a statement that the companies would benefit from building the pipeline.

TransCanada has said its proposed pipeline would create 20,000 jobs and carry 700,000 barrels of crude per day.

The State Department in a report to Congress said the project would create from 5,000 to 6,000 jobs for the two years it would take to complete, citing TransCanada's own labor expenses submitted as part of its application.

Environmental groups oppose the project because producing crude from the oil sands releases more greenhouse gases. Transporting it over the more than 1,600 miles of steel pipe also raises risks of a spill, critics say.

Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels, who was to deliver the Republican rebuttal to Obama, called Keystone a "perfectly safe pipeline that would employ tens of thousands" and said in an advance copy of his address that Obama has sought to stifle energy production in the U.S., according to excerpts released by Republicans.


Decision Deadline


Obama said last week a 60-day decline imposed by Congress didn't give him sufficient time to weigh the risks of an alternative pipeline route that would go around the environmentally sensitive Sand Hills region in Nebraska.

As he backed more domestic oil and gas production, Obama also pledged support for renewable sources of power.

Among First Lady Michelle Obama's guests was an employee of Energetx Composites in Holland, Michigan, a company that benefits from a wind production tax credit set to expire at the end of the year.

The expiration of the credit puts manufacturing jobs in "peril," Denise Bode, chief executive officer of the American Wind Energy Association, said in a statement before the speech.

The Washington-based trade group has more than 2,500 members, including General Electric Co. and Vestas Wind Systems A/S.


Efficiency Initiative


An energy efficiency initiative outlined by Obama could cut $100 billion from the nation's energy bills. Obama also pledged that the Defense Department would make the largest renewable energy purchases in history.

Obama's energy goals have met resistance in Congress. His proposal to cap carbon dioxide emissions to reduce the risks of climate change died in the Senate in 2010.

Congress has yet to act on a clean-energy standard, which Obama pitched a year ago as a replacement to his climate bill, to require more energy from low-pollution sources.

Senator Jeff Bingaman, a New Mexico Democrat and chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, plans to introduce legislation promoting a clean energy standard this year. It will likely face opposition in the Republican-led House, which generally opposes federal mandates on states.

Obama also repeated his call from last year to repeal tax credits for the oil and gas industry. That effort also failed to win broad support in Congress, after producers said the measures would push more production and jobs outside the U.S.


Working Americans


"We know our industry can put Americans to work," said Jack Gerard, president of the petroleum group, in a conference call with reporters prior to the speech. "We've been doing so, we're part of the solution that he's looking for."

While the administration has been criticized by the Washington-based petroleum group for not developing fossil fuel resources, oil and gas production have been on the rise since Obama took office.

U.S. natural gas production averaged 1.89 trillion cubic feet a month through October, 13 percent higher than the average during President George W. Bush's two terms, according to Energy Department data.

Crude oil production is 2 percent higher, the department said.

The president's promotion of natural gas follows an announcement by Chesapeake Energy Corp., the second-biggest natural gas producer in the U.S., that it would cut back on drilling to try to stop a price slide in prices.

Obama imposed a temporary moratorium on deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico after BP Plc's Macondo well exploded in April 2010, killing 11 workers and sending 4.9 million barrels of crude into the Gulf of Mexico.

Gerard said production has increased even under Obama's policies, which the group has said discourages energy development.


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/artic...25/bloomberg_articlesLYBSTC0D9L3501-LYC0R.DTL
 
LMAO... obviously the fear mongering morons succeeded in brainwashing you.

My cousin is one of the biggest fear mongering morons, otherwise known as one of the most high-profile environmentalists on the east coast, and she's shown me some really riveting info on this.

But, she's probably just a moron.

I did predict cons would love it though!
 
LMAO... obviously the fear mongering morons succeeded in brainwashing you.


By "fear mongering morons," do you mean people like Sherry Vargson:

GRANVILLE SUMMIT, Pa.—Sherry Vargson has cooked with water from a five-gallon jug for the past year. It's inconvenient, but preferable to using tap water containing enough methane gas that she can light a match and see an orange flame flare out of the faucet.

Many water supplies in northern Pennsylvania have long contained detectable levels of methane, because of poorly constructed water wells and the unusual geologic features here. But the contamination in Ms. Vargson's existing well is among the first cases that state regulators have attributed to natural-gas drilling, prompting a normally competitive group of drilling companies to work together to fix the problem.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903374004576583041824518766.html


Here's a picture:

OB-PQ395_0914me_H_20110914123617.jpg
 
Ok, if it is so bad why is Obama supporting this? What is the difference betweent this and the pipeline?
 
What's the big deal? You can have a glass of water and toast a marshmellow at the same time.

And if you need to boil some water for pasta, you won't need the stove!

Just run a pot of water, light it and watch it burn til it begins boiling!

You're ALREADY saving energy!
 
Ok, if it is so bad why is Obama supporting this? What is the difference betweent this and the pipeline?


The pipeline was to deliver oil extracted from tar sands in Canada to refineries on the Gulf coast. Fracking is done to extract natural gas from regions in New York, Western PA and similar regions. The two are very different things but both fall under the banner of "energy" projects.

As for why he's supporting it, probably because he and his team think it will help him win re-election. Maybe it is defensible on the merits, but I don't really see it. The only defense I guess is that state regulators are going to allow it anyway so he may as well get on board.
 
Some hillbillies make moonshine in the basement. Are some energy companies big polluters? I wouldn't let BP frack and I'm a shareholder.
 
An article on Fracking

This article on fracking is written by a guy who wrote The Republican War on Science and the forthcoming The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science and Reality. He went into the article "assuming that it would be easy to show that hydraulic fracturing, or blasting open rock deep underground, directly threatens drinking water supplies." But "learned [though his] reporting ... that while this may not be impossible–and while more research needs to be performed to determine how likely it is–it doesn’t appear to be the largest concern." It is a short but interesting article.
 
Bottom line: fracking poses a threat to ground water and can set off ground tremors. The proposed pipeline HAS NOT been objectively vetted for safety and environmental impact, and in the end WILL NOT supply fuel to America, but will process it for FOREIGN consumption.

Obama has (once again) pulled a Slick Willy....but no matter how many concessions he makes towards the GOP power base and his (potential) donaters in the business world, they still hate his guts and want him out of politics altogether.
 
Back
Top