wiseones2cents
Verified User
I was recently told about some bill that Obama passed(the NDAA). Basically it gives them the right to hold Americans and foreigners indefinitely. And of course putting the screws on Iran.
Apparently they are setting up Fema camps(concentration camps) all over America to hold Americans. Are they preparing to squash any uprisings that may develop(Like OWS)?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/exclusive-government-activating-fema-camps-across-u-s.html
Then I hear things like this.
http://news.yahoo.com/cops-ready-war-094500010.html
Scary stuff.
Not to mention the H.R.666 something Newt Gingrich(a Republican supported).
I can only post 2 links so google this.
H.R. 666 and the Assault on the Bill of Rights
Wednesday, 24 December 2008 14:45
by Gun Owners of America
Summary: On February 8, 1995, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 666 by a vote of 289-142. This bill, along with its companion S. 54, will allow evidence seized from otherwise illegal searches to be included in a trial if the officers can show an "objectively reasonable belief" that they were acting in "good faith." (Another bill, S. 3, is much more liberal in allowing illegally obtained evidence to be included at trial. That is, the bill does not require that the evidence must be obtained in "good faith."
Something sinister this way comes.....
What are your thoughts?
Apparently they are setting up Fema camps(concentration camps) all over America to hold Americans. Are they preparing to squash any uprisings that may develop(Like OWS)?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/exclusive-government-activating-fema-camps-across-u-s.html
Then I hear things like this.
http://news.yahoo.com/cops-ready-war-094500010.html
Scary stuff.
Not to mention the H.R.666 something Newt Gingrich(a Republican supported).
I can only post 2 links so google this.
H.R. 666 and the Assault on the Bill of Rights
Wednesday, 24 December 2008 14:45
by Gun Owners of America
Summary: On February 8, 1995, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 666 by a vote of 289-142. This bill, along with its companion S. 54, will allow evidence seized from otherwise illegal searches to be included in a trial if the officers can show an "objectively reasonable belief" that they were acting in "good faith." (Another bill, S. 3, is much more liberal in allowing illegally obtained evidence to be included at trial. That is, the bill does not require that the evidence must be obtained in "good faith."
Something sinister this way comes.....
What are your thoughts?
Last edited: