Today's the Big Day!

leaningright said:
Santorum of 2012 is the Huckabee of 2008....that's why I like him best of all the repub candidates. :)
Click to expand...

That's exactly what I thought last night. He's really right up Iowa's alley.

He'll fade fast, though. He just doesn't have the organization or cash. After NH, it's hard to see how anyone will really challenge Romney.
 
Socrtease said:
I think now, democrats should donate to Santorum's campaign. What last night showed, at least in Iowa, is that 75% of the voter DIDN'T want Romney. So the object, if you want Obama re-elected, is to help a repub candidate that independents and moderate Dems will NEVER vote for. That guy is Rick Santorum. Only in an Obama wet dream does he face Santorum in a General Election. As Bachman and Perry get out there fundamentalist voters have to go somewhere, Santorum would be the biggest beneficiary of those.
Click to expand...

I think it would prove interesting to watch how the MSM handles his extreme lunatic ideas about women. Allowing states to ban birth control? There is a very small, minute, minority of American women who have never used birth control. And only a handful of American women who are so backwards, stupid, and slavish as to even consider that. I cant' wait to see how the cons, especially the con women on television, will spin that. All of whom are on birth control btw.

Once word gets out, it should be hysterical.
 
Darla said:
I wonder how many women in Iowa voted for the guy who came out against birth control and is on record stating that he would like to overturn Griswald and allow states to BAN birth control with no interference from the Supreme Court?

These women need professional help, fast.

Truly the most crawling, pathetic, mewling, cretins to ever walk God's green earth. This is assuming they ever get off their knees and actually walk upright.
Click to expand...

santorum's been my bête noire ever since he ran for his first public office here in the early 90s. He is a deceitful, lying hypocritical p.o.s. of the first order. He lied to get elected and lied even more to cover up his initial lies. If he advances to becoming a serious contender, which I doubt, I'll spend every spare minute I have working against him. He's a two-faced, sanctimonious phony with a forked tongue bigger than Nagini's.
 
christiefan915 said:
santorum's been my bête noire ever since he ran for his first public office here in the early 90s. He is a deceitful, lying hypocritical p.o.s. of the first order. He lied to get elected and lied even more to cover up his initial lies. If he advances to becoming a serious contender, which I doubt, I'll spend every spare minute I have working against him. He's a two-faced, sanctimonious phony with a forked tongue bigger than Nagini's.
Click to expand...

It's weird. On one hand, I'd love to see him as the nominee. Women aren't going to vote for that, period. Very few. He'd lose in a landslide. OTOH, just someone out there making the case that women are less than human so infuriates me, as does any pos woman, or authoritarian man, who defends him, that I fear my blood pressure, which currently sits at a very pretty 110/70, could not withstand it.
 
Onceler said:
Wait a sec - Santorum is anti-birth control?
Click to expand...

:dunno:

I didn't pay that much attention to him until now. His surprising showing in Iowa makes him somewhat relevant for a while...

I'll have to look into that. I'll need a bit more evidence than somebody just saying he is.
 
Darla said:
I wonder how many women in Iowa voted for the guy who came out against birth control and is on record stating that he would like to overturn Griswald and allow states to BAN birth control with no interference from the Supreme Court?

These women need professional help, fast.

Truly the most crawling, pathetic, mewling, cretins to ever walk God's green earth. This is assuming they ever get off their knees and actually walk upright.
Click to expand...

How many times have we said it. These people are unable to comprehend that santorum and his ilk will always work against their best interests. Yet they get all starry-eyed over propaganda like "taking our country back", "real Americans", "bring God back into the country", etc. You have to wonder if history and civics are being taught anymore in conservative states.
 
Onceler said:
Wait a sec - Santorum is anti-birth control?
Click to expand...

Yes, didn't you click on my "bitch" link? :)

He stated that birth control is “It’s not okay. It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be”

He then came out and stated he is for allowing states to ban birth control, which would of course, overturn Griswald vs CT. Griswald has always been the true target of the anti-choice movement. To be clear, individual so-called, pro-life voters, may very well not know this, nor agree with it. I am talking about the professional anti-choice movement.

Very few of the high-profile nutballs are willing to come out and go on record that Griswald is the ultimate target. I suppose that we can all thank this lunatic for doing so.
 
Ah... I see. He supports states' rights, and was asked, "What about this SCOTUS ruling?" and said that states should have the right to ban contraception and that he thought the ruling was a bad one.

Basically he thinks that the states have been stripped of rights.

He even said, "I wouldn't vote for a law like that, because I think it is an improper law, but think the state should be able to pass laws that aren't covered by direct constitutional rights" (paraphrasing)...
 
Damocles said:
:dunno:

I didn't pay that much attention to him until now. His surprising showing in Iowa makes him somewhat relevant for a while...

I'll have to look into that. I'll need a bit more evidence than somebody just saying he is.
Click to expand...

Well, you can click on my bitch link and watch him say it for yourself. I purposefully linked it with the word "BITCH" as in shut the f up and have another baby BITCH.
 
Darla said:
Yes, didn't you click on my "bitch" link? :)

He stated that birth control is “It’s not okay. It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be”

He then came out and stated he is for allowing states to ban birth control, which would of course, overturn Griswald vs CT. Griswald has always been the true target of the anti-choice movement. To be clear, individual so-called, pro-life voters, may very well not know this, nor agree with it. I am talking about the professional anti-choice movement.

Very few of the high-profile nutballs are willing to come out and go on record that Griswald is the ultimate target. I suppose that we can all thank this lunatic for doing so.
Click to expand...

That's bananas. It's really an automatic disqualifier.

I mean, can anyone imagine the country without birth control? That's not just a candidacy killer - it's positively insane.
 
Onceler said:
That's exactly what I thought last night. He's really right up Iowa's alley.

He'll fade fast, though. He just doesn't have the organization or cash. After NH, it's hard to see how anyone will really challenge Romney.
Click to expand...

It's not just money or organization. Once people start delving into his record and learning the facts about this pos, he's toast.
 
Damocles said:
Ah... I see. He supports states' rights, and was asked, "What about this SCOTUS ruling?" and said that states should have the right to ban contraception and that he thought the ruling was a bad one.

Basically he thinks that the states have been stripped of rights.

He even said, "I wouldn't vote for a law like that, because I think it is an improper law, but think the state should be able to pass laws that aren't covered by direct constitutional rights" (paraphrasing)...
Click to expand...

WRONG. he said he wouldn't vote for an anti-sodomy law. He is on record stating he does not believe in birth control, I just gave you the entire quote.

Further, he is talking about overturning Griswald Vs Connecticut, which would allow states to ban birth control. Calling it state's rights, doesn't make it okay, or change this in any way.

You call yourself a libertarian? You just crawled into bed with the worse theocratic cretins in this country.
 
Onceler said:
Wait a sec - Santorum is anti-birth control?
Click to expand...

He shields his hypocrisy with the Constitution.

"In an interview with Jake Tapper on ABC News, Santorum reiterated his opposition to the Supreme Court’s 1965 ruling that prevented Connecticut from banning contraception. “The state has a right to do that, I have never questioned that the state has a right to do that," he said. "It is not a constitutional right. The state has the right to pass whatever statutes they have. That's the thing I have said about the activism of the Supreme Court--they are creating rights, and it should be left up to the people to decide."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/...th-control-sodomy_n_1181291.html?ref=politics
 
Darla said:
It's weird. On one hand, I'd love to see him as the nominee. Women aren't going to vote for that, period. Very few. He'd lose in a landslide. OTOH, just someone out there making the case that women are less than human so infuriates me, as does any pos woman, or authoritarian man, who defends him, that I fear my blood pressure, which currently sits at a very pretty 110/70, could not withstand it.
Click to expand...

I hear ya! My heart rate's been speeding up ever since I clicked on this thread.
 
Darla said:
WRONG. he said he wouldn't vote for an anti-sodomy law. He is on record stating he does not believe in birth control, I just gave you the entire quote.

Further, he is talking about overturning Griswald Vs Connecticut, which would allow states to ban birth control. Calling it state's rights, doesn't make it okay, or change this in any way.

You call yourself a libertarian? You just crawled into bed with the worse theocratic cretins in this country.
Click to expand...

Cut Damo some slack. He spent the past few weeks trying to figure out how he was going to apologize for Newt for the next 10 months. Now, he has to switch on a dime to Santorum...
 
Damocles said:
Ah... I see. He supports states' rights, and was asked, "What about this SCOTUS ruling?" and said that states should have the right to ban contraception and that he thought the ruling was a bad one.

Basically he thinks that the states have been stripped of rights.

He even said, "I wouldn't vote for a law like that, because I think it is an improper law, but think the state should be able to pass laws that aren't covered by direct constitutional rights" (paraphrasing)...
Click to expand...


I'd like to know how anybody could even think the state has a right to decide what women should put into their bodies.
 
Romney and Santorum. Good men. Leaders. Honorable. Lovers of traditional America and our values.

Everything the left hates.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top