Billy the Great Khan
Uwaa OmO
With the lower gravity it wouldn't be an accurate test.Subject to constant temperature, pressure and wind velocity, on the Moon would be the best place to try it.
With the lower gravity it wouldn't be an accurate test.Subject to constant temperature, pressure and wind velocity, on the Moon would be the best place to try it.
With the lower gravity it wouldn't be an accurate test.
It would if the drop was high enough.
Don't they have hills in Ohio? Why not shoot it into the side of a hill?
Agreed!And there is a difference between clearing a round and cleaning a gun. The story is written by somebody who didn't know what they were talking about.
A man cleared his gun recklessly, and he should pay for it.
The issue isn't terminal velocity, its whether or not said projectile could travel that large of a distance.
You're the one looking for an argument, and now I know why.
1.5 miles is pretty far for a round ball. Do we know for sure it was a round ball?
Untrue.
You responded on the thread regarding the bottle used for lighting and this one, in exactly the same way.
You took the comment and instead of adding to it, you attempted to detract from it.
Ergo: my reason for asking you.
But after reading the majority of your posts, for the past week, it's become obvious that you have no intention of "discussion" and instead just wish to argu; with a side agenda of trying to find any form of a "gotcha" that you can try to use against the original poster.
This behavior not only makes you appear to be slightly confused; but also casts a suspicion on any information that you may provide.
But then; it's your choice and not mine.
I'd say that's a fair and accurate analysis.Untrue.
You responded on the thread regarding the bottle used for lighting and this one, in exactly the same way.
You took the comment and instead of adding to it, you attempted to detract from it.
Ergo: my reason for asking you.
But after reading the majority of your posts, for the past week, it's become obvious that you have no intention of "discussion" and instead just wish to argu; with a side agenda of trying to find any form of a "gotcha" that you can try to use against the original poster.
This behavior not only makes you appear to be slightly confused; but also casts a suspicion on any information that you may provide.
But then; it's your choice and not mine.
Untrue.
You responded on the thread regarding the bottle used for lighting and this one, in exactly the same way.
You took the comment and instead of adding to it, you attempted to detract from it.
Ergo: my reason for asking you.
But after reading the majority of your posts, for the past week, it's become obvious that you have no intention of "discussion" and instead just wish to argu; with a side agenda of trying to find any form of a "gotcha" that you can try to use against the original poster.
This behavior not only makes you appear to be slightly confused; but also casts a suspicion on any information that you may provide.
But then; it's your choice and not mine.
I'd say that's a fair and accurate analysis.
God, that sums him up perfectly.
The irony here is amazing:
What?OH, I know exactly who I am and I don't try to hide it behind some kind of faux righteous indignation or a cheap imitation of Mr. Wizard.
So the only irony, is in your own inability to take responsiblity for you have wrought.
By the way, there are plenty of others that need to review their own reflection also.
Is mother going to unlock the basement door for you on Christmas?