Shame on you, RINO Paul

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
G

Guns Guns Guns

Guest
Ron Paul's supporters are sure of one thing: Their candidate has always been consistent—a point Dr. Paul himself has been making with increasing frequency.


It's a thought that comes up with a certain inevitability now in those roundtables on the Republican field.


One cable commentator genially instructed us last Friday, "You have to give Paul credit for sticking to his beliefs."


He was speaking, it's hardly necessary to say, of a man who holds some noteworthy views in a candidate for the presidency of the United States.


One who is the best-known of our homegrown propagandists for our chief enemies in the world.


One who has made himself a leading spokesman for, and recycler of, the long and familiar litany of charges that point to the United States as a leading agent of evil and injustice, the militarist victimizer of millions who want only to live in peace.


Hear Dr. Paul on the subject of the 9/11 terror attacks—an event, he assures his audiences, that took place only because of U.S. aggression and military actions.



There is among some supporters now drawn to Dr. Paul a tendency to look away from the candidate's reflexive way of assigning the blame for evil—the evil, in particular, of terrorism—to the United States.


There he was at the debate waving his arms, charging that the U.S. was declaring "war on 1.2 billion Muslims," that it "viewed all Muslims as the same."


Yes, he allowed, "there are a few radicals"—and then he proceeded to hold forth again on the good reasons terrorists had for mounting attacks on us.


Paul-Ron_ClownShoes.jpg


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204552304577112761003972028.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
 
the hypocrisy of the libs on full display. as they blamed the US for muslim hostility and said that Obama would make it all better, but let a non liberal make the same claim and all of a sudden it's USA! USA! USA!
 
LOL at SmarterThanFew, who thinks the Murdoch-owned WSJ is "liberal"....


There can be no confusion about Dr. Paul's own comments about the U.S. After 9/11, he said to students in Iowa, there was "glee in the administration because now we can invade Iraq."


It takes a profoundly envenomed mindset—one also deeply at odds with reality—to believe and to say publicly that the administration of this nation brought so low with grief and loss after the attack had reacted with glee.


There are, to be sure, a number of like-minded citizens around (see the 9/11 Truthers, whose opinions Dr. Paul has said he doesn't share). But we don't expect to find their views in people running for the nation's highest office.


The Paul comment here is worth more than a passing look. It sums up much we have already heard from him.


It's the voice of that ideological school whose central doctrine is the proposition that the U.S. is the main cause of misery and terror in the world.



kkjf-44418373314_xlarge.jpeg


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204552304577112761003972028.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
 
SmarterThanYou said:
LOL at you, dumber than me, because I was talking about you.
Click to expand...

LOL at you, SmarterThanFew, who says I'm a liberal when I posted a story from a conservative media source...

Take your tinfoil-hat turdblossom Texan thumbsucker and GTFO out of the GOP...


RINOS_NoMoreRINOS_25.png
 
\(())/ said:
LOL at you, SmarterThanFew, who says I'm a liberal when I posted a story from a conservative media source...

Take your tinfoil-hat turdblossom Texan thumbsucker and GTFO out of the GOP...
Click to expand...

you're about two steps away from being as much a liberal as taichiliberal is.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
you're about two steps away from being as much a liberal as taichiliberal is.
Click to expand...

Here's the RINO you support:

His efforts on behalf of Iran's right to the status of misunderstood victim continued apace.


On the Hannity show following the debate, Dr. Paul urged the host to understand that Iran's leader, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, had never mentioned any intention of wiping Israel off the map.


It was all a mistranslation, he explained.


What about Ahmadinejad's denial of the Holocaust?


A short silence ensued as the candidate stared into space.


He moved quickly on to a more secure subject.


"They're just defending themselves," he declared.


Presumably he was referring to Iran's wishes for a bomb.


It would have been intriguing to hear his answer had he been asked about another Ahmadinejad comment, made more than once—the one in which the Iranian leader declares the U.S. "a Satanic power that will, with God's will, be annihilated."

RINO-Dixiecrat-Ron-Paul-55862299910.jpeg



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204552304577112761003972028.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
 
SmarterThanYou said:
more proof that the establishment smear campaign is in full gear. too bad you retard sheeple are swallowing it like cop jizz.
Click to expand...

You still refuse to condemn the racist statements published in RINO Ron Paul's newsletter.

Does that mean you agree with them?

You won't say that RINO Ron Paul is wrong to blame America for 9/11.

Does that mean you agree with him?
 
SmarterThanYou said:
more retardedness from legion. why won't you come out of the liberal closet? ashamed to be one?
Click to expand...

Man up, Mr. Macho Marine...

Do you agree with the racist quotes in RINO Ron Pauls' newsletter, or not?

Yes, or no.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
your refusal to accept that you're a liberal makes you look ashamed of yourself.
Click to expand...

Will SmarterThanFew deny that RINO Paul was responsible for these comments in his newletters, puss out and hide, or take the other tack and boast that he agrees with RINO Ron?



Some choice quotes:

"Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."

"We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational."

After the Los Angeles riots, one article in a newsletter claimed, "Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."

One referred to Martin Luther King Jr. as "the world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours" and who "seduced underage girls and boys."

Another referred to Barbara Jordan, a civil rights activist and congresswoman as "Barbara Morondon," the "archetypical half-educated victimologist."

Other newsletters had strange conspiracy theories about homosexuals, the CIA, and AIDS.



http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...etters/250338/​
 
SmarterThanYou said:
I will neither confirm nor deny, especially since it wouldn't matter to your dumb ass anyway, liberal.
Click to expand...

So I'll draw my own conclusion, racist coward.

People who traffic in ideas have a responsibility to monitor what goes out under their names.

Had someone published such offensive drivel under mine, I'd be furious, and I'd damn well identify and repudiate the author.

Why has Paul failed to do so?


http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...ing-with-ron-pauls-racist-newsletters/250206/
 
You're done, racist pussy.

Dis-missed.



Paul's campaign wants to depict its candidate as a naïve, absentee overseer, with minimal knowledge of what his underlings were doing on his behalf.


This portrayal might be more believable if extremist views had cropped up in the newsletters only sporadically--or if the newsletters had just been published for a short time.


But it is difficult to imagine how Paul could allow material consistently saturated in racism, homophobia, anti-Semitism, and conspiracy-mongering to be printed under his name for so long if he did not share these views.


In that respect, whether or not Paul personally wrote the most offensive passages is almost beside the point.


If he disagreed with what was being written under his name, you would think that at some point--over the course of decades--he would have done something about it.



http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...ing-with-ron-pauls-racist-newsletters/250206/​
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top