CA Prop. 8 shot down

  • Thread starter Thread starter WinterBorn
  • Start date Start date
dixon76710 said:
No doubt you prefer the communist playbook that seeks to dismantle the importance of the nuclear family.
Click to expand...

I think its funny that you and people like you ignore the fact that gay couples raising children is a family.
 
Rana said:
Two parent homes does not guarantee the well being of the children, sorry, not a good reason to deny gays their rights.
Click to expand...

No one claimed there was a guarantee. Children born into homes with both their mother and father tend on average to do better. Less poverty, less junenile delinquincy, less teen pregnancy, less HS dropouts, than children who are born into the alternative of one or none of their parents present. And its not the reason for excluding gays. It is the reason for including heterosexuals. The only ones who create children in need of care.
 
christiefan915 said:
I'll take it that you are pro-choice only. In other words, selective about which life should be held sacred.
Click to expand...

The innocent life is held sacred. I'll take it that you're always for "The Children" unless the children happen to be in the womb. Too bad for them.
 
Queers have a higher rate of alcoholism, drug addiction, STDs, suicide, mental illness, etc than normal people. It's better for the children to have a family with a mom and a dad.
 
WinterBorn said:
I think its funny that you and people like you ignore the fact that gay couples raising children is a family.
Click to expand...


???? Single mother and grandmother living down the street, raising three children together are a family. Any two consenting adults could join together to rasie a child, and yet you want special treatment when those two people happen to be gay. What possible justification could there be for such discrimination?

You people dont see any advantage to biological parents, and here you are wanting preferences for gay parents??? WTF!
 
Alias said:
It's a fact, but it's not the best for the children. A home with a mom and dad is the best.
Click to expand...

You can keep repeating that all you want. But numerous studies have shown children raised by gays turn out the same as children raised by straights. I have not seen one reputable study show anything different.
 
dixon76710 said:
???? Single mother and grandmother living down the street, raising three children together are a family. Any two consenting adults could join together to rasie a child, and yet you want special treatment when those two people happen to be gay. What possible justification could there be for such discrimination?

You people dont see any advantage to biological parents, and here you are wanting preferences for gay parents??? WTF!
Click to expand...

Dixon, let me ask you, yet again, do you have any evidence to show being raised by biological parents improves a child's life? Or that it is superior to being raised by step-parents or adoptive parents?
 
Alias said:
Queers have a higher rate of alcoholism, drug addiction, STDs, suicide, mental illness, etc than normal people. It's better for the children to have a family with a mom and a dad.
Click to expand...

That is a nice opinion. Do you have any evidence to back that up?
 
WinterBorn said:
You can keep repeating that all you want. But numerous studies have shown children raised by gays turn out the same as children raised by straights. I have not seen one reputable study show anything different.
Click to expand...

Why, of course. I would not expect you to say anything else.
 
Alias said:
Why, of course. I would not expect you to say anything else.
Click to expand...

I have posted links to those studies. Feel free to post reputable studies that refute what I have said.



And feel free to answer my question about what you think the adverse effects of gay marriage would be. I'm sure you have noticed the question by now. So has it been long enough and asked often enough to say you haven't got the balls to answer it? lol
 
WinterBorn said:
I have posted links to those studies. Feel free to post reputable studies that refute what I have said.



And feel free to answer my question about what you think the adverse effects of gay marriage would be. I'm sure you have noticed the question by now. So has it been long enough and asked often enough to say you haven't got the balls to answer it? lol
Click to expand...

"reputable". Oh yes. And we both know who determines what "reputable" is. Don't we. I know what you're gonna say next even before you do.
 
Alias said:
"reputable". Oh yes. And we both know who determines what "reputable" is. Don't we. I know what you're gonna say next even before you do.
Click to expand...

Reputable means peer reviewed and properly done.

In other words, you can't say "I studied it and say kids need both biological parents".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top