When they say, "traditional Biblical marriage," show them this.

[Alias]

Looks like a good case for you are a retard.

There you have if folks. We report, you decide.

 

[Alias]

There you go again, talking about your mama. You are clearly the one that is lacking in reading comprehension. Everybody got "it", but you. LOL.

We all know when you start talking about people's mama that you've lost the debate. It's as predictable as sunset followed by darkness.

 

[DamnYankee]

We all know when you start talking about people's mama that you've lost the debate. It's as predictable as sunset followed by darkness.

I've noticed that too.

 

[DamnYankee]

Um... You were the one that said that the bible made a "good argument" for making a law, not me saying that current "restrictions" are based in anything at all. You make the assertion, expect people to "suggest" that the Constitution may get in your way.

The Bible does make a good argument, but that's not necessarily what our current laws are based.

 

[Damocles]

The Bible does make a good argument, but that's not necessarily what our current laws are based.

My point: It is a bad argument, because we have this Amendment number one... see?

 

[christiefan915]

I've noticed that too.

...sez Jekyll to Hyde.

 

[poet]

We all know when you start talking about people's mama that you've lost the debate. It's as predictable as sunset followed by darkness.

Your mama.

 

[poet]

I've noticed that too.

Your mama, too.

 

[DamnYankee]

Your mama, too.

I win!

 

[DamnYankee]

...sez Jekyll to Hyde.

When have I ever insulted another poster's mother? That is, unless you are Zippy's mom.

 

[DamnYankee]

My point: It is a bad argument, because we have this Amendment number one... see?

No I don't. I said that the Bible makes a good argument, but that's not necessarily the basis of my argument, or the current laws. You seem to insist otherwise. *shrug*