Occupy protests cost nation's cities at least $13M

RockX

Banned
The 4,000+ arrests, the constant street violence, the drug use, vandalism, rapes, public pooping, ring worm outbreaks, attacks on children and death… have cost tax payers over $13 million dollars so far.


NEW YORK (AP) — During the first two months of the nationwide Occupy protests, the movement that is demanding more out of the wealthiest Americans cost local taxpayers at least $13 million in police overtime and other municipal services, according to a survey by The Associated Press.



The heaviest financial burden has fallen upon law enforcement agencies tasked with monitoring marches and evicting protesters from outdoor camps. And the steepest costs by far piled up in New York City and Oakland, Calif., where police clashed with protesters on several occasions.


The AP gathered figures from government agencies in 18 cities with active protests and focused on costs through Nov. 15, the day protesters were evicted from New York City's Zuccotti Park, where the protests began Sept. 17 before spreading nationwide. The survey did not attempt to tally the price of all protests but provides a glimpse of costs to cities large and small.


Broken down city by city, the numbers are more or less in line with the cost of policing major public events and emergencies. In Los Angeles, for example, the Michael Jackson memorial concert cost the city $1.4 million. And Atlanta spent several million dollars after a major snow and ice storm this year.


But the price of the protests is rising by the day — along with taxpayer ire in some places.

"What is their real agenda?" asked Rodger Mawhinney as he watched police remove an encampment outside his apartment complex in downtown Oakland. "I've gone up and asked them, 'What are you truly trying to accomplish?' I'm still waiting for an answer."


The Occupy movement has intentionally never clarified its policy objectives, relying instead on a broad message opposing corporate excess and income inequality. Aside from policing, cleaning and repairing property at dozens of 24-hour encampments, cities have had to monitor frequent rallies and protests.

http://news.yahoo.com/occupy-protests-cost-nations-cities-least-13m-073242555.html



They should send the bill to the DNC.
 
The 4,000+ arrests, the constant street violence, the drug use, vandalism, rapes, public pooping, ring worm outbreaks, attacks on children and death… have cost tax payers over $13 million dollars so far.


NEW YORK (AP) — During the first two months of the nationwide Occupy protests, the movement that is demanding more out of the wealthiest Americans cost local taxpayers at least $13 million in police overtime and other municipal services, according to a survey by The Associated Press.



The heaviest financial burden has fallen upon law enforcement agencies tasked with monitoring marches and evicting protesters from outdoor camps. And the steepest costs by far piled up in New York City and Oakland, Calif., where police clashed with protesters on several occasions.


The AP gathered figures from government agencies in 18 cities with active protests and focused on costs through Nov. 15, the day protesters were evicted from New York City's Zuccotti Park, where the protests began Sept. 17 before spreading nationwide. The survey did not attempt to tally the price of all protests but provides a glimpse of costs to cities large and small.


Broken down city by city, the numbers are more or less in line with the cost of policing major public events and emergencies. In Los Angeles, for example, the Michael Jackson memorial concert cost the city $1.4 million. And Atlanta spent several million dollars after a major snow and ice storm this year.


But the price of the protests is rising by the day — along with taxpayer ire in some places.

"What is their real agenda?" asked Rodger Mawhinney as he watched police remove an encampment outside his apartment complex in downtown Oakland. "I've gone up and asked them, 'What are you truly trying to accomplish?' I'm still waiting for an answer."


The Occupy movement has intentionally never clarified its policy objectives, relying instead on a broad message opposing corporate excess and income inequality. Aside from policing, cleaning and repairing property at dozens of 24-hour encampments, cities have had to monitor frequent rallies and protests.

http://news.yahoo.com/occupy-protests-cost-nations-cities-least-13m-073242555.html



They should send the bill to the DNC.

The financial cowboys that caused the banking crisis have cost trillions so far, what have you got to say about that?
 
The financial cowboys that caused the banking crisis have cost trillions so far, what have you got to say about that?

Does your deflection of the article mean that you find it OK for what this is costing the cities and ultimately the public? You know; those 99%.
 
I can't help but notice that you haven't supplied any proof of your statement, though.

It's really cute how you guys circle the wagons around posters like bravs & Dixie.

I don't link, but I assume you righties know how to google. There have been several TEA party protests at AZ TEA events (one for a guy bringing a symbolic pitchfork to a protest); 10 protesters were arrested at a protest outside of Pelosi's office for disorderly conduct; there were 2 arrests at a Houston event, etc.

My statement wasn't an attempt to create equivalency. The OWS protests have been infinitely more disorderly & violent. It was to take issue with a statement that I knew Dixie was pulling from nowhere - that there were NO arrests at TEA party events or protests. Btw, he also said that tea party protesters left areas cleaner than when they arrived.

But, naturally, none of you hacks have issues with those kinds of fabrications. It's always circle the wagons time for the right on here....
 
one of the grand wizards even said yestarday any arrest at teabagger events was outsiders infiltraiting. Fucking trailer trash clowns. They are a testiment to public education though.
 
Nice thread high-jack.....

So if we're on the this now, there is plenty of blame to go around starting in the Clinton days....if you have an open mind

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/Extra/did-clinton-cause-the-banking-crisis.aspx

If you had been paying attention I said the other day that Glass-Steagall should be reintroduced, Clinton indeed signed the act abolishing it. I should point out that Alan Greenspan and the banking industry had been calling for its repeal for at least a decade before.

The banking industry had been seeking the repeal of Glass–Steagall since at least the 1980s. In 1987 the Congressional Research Service prepared a report which explored the cases for and against preserving the Glass–Steagall act.[SUP][14][/SUP]


The argument for preserving Glass–Steagall (as written in 1987):



  1. Conflicts of interest characterize the granting of credit (that is to say, lending) and the use of credit (that is to say, investing) by the same entity, which led to abuses that originally produced the Act.
  2. Depository institutions possess enormous financial power, by virtue of their control of other people's money; its extent must be limited to ensure soundness and competition in the market for funds, whether loans or investments.
  3. Securities activities can be risky, leading to enormous losses. Such losses could threaten the integrity of deposits. In turn, the Government insures deposits and could be required to pay large sums if depository institutions were to collapse as the result of securities losses.
  4. Depository institutions are supposed to be managed to limit risk. Their managers thus may not be conditioned to operate prudently in more speculative securities businesses. An example is the crash of real estate investment trusts sponsored by bank holding companies (in the 1970s and 1980s).
The argument against preserving the Act (as written in 1987):

  1. Depository institutions will now operate in "deregulated" financial markets in which distinctions between loans, securities, and deposits are not well drawn. They are losing market shares to securities firms that are not so strictly regulated, and to foreign financial institutions operating without much restriction from the Act.
  2. Conflicts of interest can be prevented by enforcing legislation against them, and by separating the lending and credit functions through forming distinctly separate subsidiaries of financial firms.
  3. The securities activities that depository institutions are seeking are both low-risk by their very nature and would reduce the total risk of organizations offering them – by diversification.
  4. In much of the rest of the world, depository institutions operate simultaneously and successfully in both banking and securities markets. Lessons learned from their experience can be applied to our national financial structure and regulation.[SUP][14][/SUP]
  5. [SUP]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass–Steagall_Act#cite_note-digital.library.unt.edu-13
  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass–Steagall_Act#cite_note-digital.library.unt.edu-13[/SUP]
http://www.americanbanker.com/175/greenspan-urges-glass-steagall-repeal-1044317-1.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass–Steagall_Act
 
Last edited:
I'm saying that it's a piss in a bucket compared to the banking crisis and that's where the true deflection is occurring.

Since it's just a "piss in a bucket", then what.........................we should just ignore how it's affecting already cash strapped city budgets?
 
It's really cute how you guys circle the wagons around posters like bravs & Dixie.

I don't link, but I assume you righties know how to google. There have been several TEA party protests at AZ TEA events (one for a guy bringing a symbolic pitchfork to a protest); 10 protesters were arrested at a protest outside of Pelosi's office for disorderly conduct; there were 2 arrests at a Houston event, etc.

My statement wasn't an attempt to create equivalency. The OWS protests have been infinitely more disorderly & violent. It was to take issue with a statement that I knew Dixie was pulling from nowhere - that there were NO arrests at TEA party events or protests. Btw, he also said that tea party protesters left areas cleaner than when they arrived.

But, naturally, none of you hacks have issues with those kinds of fabrications. It's always circle the wagons time for the right on here....

we know, you only demand them from others
 
It's really cute how you guys circle the wagons around posters like bravs & Dixie.

I don't link, but I assume you righties know how to google. There have been several TEA party protests at AZ TEA events (one for a guy bringing a symbolic pitchfork to a protest); 10 protesters were arrested at a protest outside of Pelosi's office for disorderly conduct; there were 2 arrests at a Houston event, etc.

My statement wasn't an attempt to create equivalency. The OWS protests have been infinitely more disorderly & violent. It was to take issue with a statement that I knew Dixie was pulling from nowhere - that there were NO arrests at TEA party events or protests. Btw, he also said that tea party protesters left areas cleaner than when they arrived.

But, naturally, none of you hacks have issues with those kinds of fabrications. It's always circle the wagons time for the right on here....

The Tea Party people cleaned up their own sites when they were through. These people have jobs and pay taxes. The Tea Party people are the backbone of America. No person in their right mind can even compare the TP with the OWS. There is no comparison whatsoever.
 
Back
Top