Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Still nothing on the ACTUAL data Mott? Are you really just going to stick with the 'I was there man, I was there' line of bullshit?
Still nothing on the ACTUAL data Mott? Are you really just going to stick with the 'I was there man, I was there' line of bullshit?
Dude you can prattle on all you want to with what you read from some right wing talking head. I was there. I lived through it and I saw it. You didn't.
The second oil crisis happened in 1979, six years after the first when prices quadrupled overnight.
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-carterreagan.htm
Dude, you're so bloody convincing!!
That piece is on a very aptly named website. What a friggin joke.
1) Inflation was falling as Carter took office and was back under 6%
2) GDP growth was as I mentioned above 4+% from 1976-1979
3) Unemployment was down near full employment
4) That site PRETENDS Carter let Volcker initiate his plan and keep it in place. Carter did not. He did let Volcker try it, but as soon as the inevitable recession signs started, Carter ran away and backed off, Volcker then lowered rates again because Carter was unwilling to take the political hit for the good of the country. Once Reagan took office, THEN Volcker was allowed to follow through on his plan. The recession of 81/82 hit and Reagan got the Reps hammered in the mid terms as a result.
5) The Volcker plan did not result in 7 years of growth, it resulted in a bull market from 1982-2000. A bit more than 7 years. A brief blip of a recession caused by Bush's tax hikes was the only hiccup in that run.
Then we also should have tried the administrations of Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Clinton, Bush and who knows where we would be today. But I know, we only look at what Reagan did because he is the big boogey man of the left. His successes far outweigh his negatives... as I stated, Reagan made the hard choice that Carter ran away from. Just as Mott runs away from addressing any of the actual FACTS of the state of the economy when Carter took office.
The author of the OP article needs to study Oswald a bit more. There was a LOT more to Oswald's bizarre nature than merely his trip to the USSR. The punk even tried to assasinate a Marine Corps Maj. Gen. who was still somewhat famous at the time. Oswald further continued to preach communism on the streets, and on the talk shows he frequently called into, even after experiencing the drab and depressing life of communism behind the Iron Curtain.
Its fairly obvious that Oswald was a punk, and a young fool, who was desperately seeking attention. He settled on assasination as the means to acheive fame, because the one thing he was good at in life was handling a rifle.
Yea, like Oswald's CIA connection? Or Attorney General Robert Kennedy's phone conversation on November 22 that sheds light on his thinking that afternoon. He spoke to Enrique ‘Harry' Ruiz-Williams, a Bay of Pigs veteran who was his closest associate in the Cuban exile community. Kennedy stunned his friend by telling him point-blank, ‘One of your guys did it.'”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/hornberger/hornberger167.html
In 1979, inflation averaged over 11%
http://inflationdata.com/inflation/Inflation_Rate/HistoricalInflation.aspx?dsInflation_currentPage=2
Selling weapons illegally, that hard choice? I bet more of that crap goes on than we realize. Reagan was the beginning a a power control surge that has spiraled us down to the point we are at today. The middle class took their eyes off the ball and blindly believed our government could do no wrong. We are paying for that mentality now. Überpatriotism and the anti Americanism of those who try to hold the government accountable. This RIGHTIE blind attitude that Reagan was a saint and that he did more right than wrong is absolute bullshit. Sorry, Superfreak, but Reagan started the slide into mediocrity!
I want to know who was behind Oswald. He may have been the lone shooter, but how and why.
NO.... Please tell me your reading skills have not fallen to the pathetic levels of Mott. As for your comments on the start of the power control surge... sorry, but that began under Kennedy and Johnson and was precisely what Ike warned us about.
Please tell me who found holding the government accountable was unpatriotic?
Reagan DID far more good for this country than bad. I acknowledged the fact that he had several things that were bad, Iran contra being the biggest. That said, as you stated, that shit has been going on long before Reagan. He just got caught.
Tell me, if Reagan started a slide into mediocrity, Why is it that the US dominated from 1982-2000? I know the left loves to hate Reagan, but enough with the wild falsehoods.
I want to know who was behind Oswald. He may have been the lone shooter, but how and why.
Dominated how? Economically, militarily?
Is domination all that important, or maintanence? Are we still top in medicine, education, science? How about human rights, the arts, music?
We have the largest military and we have strong armed pur wy into the minds and hearts of the rest of the planet, but are we excelling in the things that count and benefit humankind and the Earth. Is our dominance leading us to improve our quality of life or are we struggling? Is the average citizen better off than we were before 1982?
I don't think so and anytime someone doesn't agree with your opinions you claim they have reading comprehension problems and that isn't the case, but you go a head and insult, if it makes you feel superior, I don't need to do that, I don't need to put you down in order to understand that your opinion is different than mine. I have my own opinion as to when the change started in this country, when civilize discourse started to go by the wayside. When you were considered antiAmerican to question government.
I have witnessed the demonization of people in the last thirty years if their ideas were "liberal" and it started with the Reagan administration and the idea that he was the President sent by God and the GOP was the party of god to question was questioning God.
So, I guess it just boils own to hat you believe mediocrity is and my definition, nd to me, the USA is swimming in mediocrity. We have settled for less thn great and it is mirrored in our policies and our politics!
NO.... Please tell me your reading skills have not fallen to the pathetic levels of Mott. As for your comments on the start of the power control surge... sorry, but that began under Kennedy and Johnson and was precisely what Ike warned us about.
Please tell me who found holding the government accountable was unpatriotic?
Reagan DID far more good for this country than bad. I acknowledged the fact that he had several things that were bad, Iran contra being the biggest. That said, as you stated, that shit has been going on long before Reagan. He just got caught.
Tell me, if Reagan started a slide into mediocrity, Why is it that the US dominated from 1982-2000? I know the left loves to hate Reagan, but enough with the wild falsehoods.
Yes to both. While we have faded a bit as of late, we are still the economic powerhouse... especially compared to the EU.
Yes, we are still top in medicine and in innovation in general. Education has certainly faltered, the more the teachers union resists change and continues to teach to the lowest common denominator, the further we will fall behind. While science in schools is certainly faltering like education in general... the US still leads in medical and scientific innovations. Human rights? Depends on if you mean how we treat our own citizens, how we treat others or a combo. We are good on the first, weak on the second and average on the third. Arts and music... not really the best to judge these areas... off the cuff I would say we can hold our own in music, for art... I would guess no, but I really don't have a clue if we 'dominate'
The average citizen is far better off than we were in 1982.
LMAO... no, I had problems not with people stating opposing opinions, but with those who try to restate what I said incorrectly as both Rana and Mott did in this thread. i encourage you to state your opinions... especially when you do so in your own words like this post rather than cutting and pasting.
yes, many of the far right do demonize 'liberals', just as many on the far left demonize 'conservatives'. I love how the left always tries to blame Reagan for 'starting' everything 'bad'.
There are certainly areas where we have settled for mediocrity. Education being the easiest to see. Teaching to the lowest common denominator. Coddling children with the mentality that 'everyone gets a trophy and gets to win'. The mindset that is propagated by the left. The 'punish successful people because they have more stuff than me' mentality also leads many to complacency.
But saying the US is swimming in mediocrity is an opinion I do not share. We are still the leaders in innovation (not in every category, but overall). Overall our 'poor' are far better off than most countries 'middle class'.
Yes, i know..... Inflation escalated dramatically under Carter.
In November 1978, a strike by 37,000 workers at Iran's nationalized oil refineries initially reduced production from 6 million barrels (950,000 m[SUP]3[/SUP]) per day to about 1.5 million barrels (240,000 m[SUP]3[/SUP]).[SUP][5][/SUP] Foreign workers (including skilled oil workers) fled the country. On January 16, 1979, Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and his wife left Iran at the behest of Prime Minister Shapour Bakhtiar (a long time opposition leader himself), who sought to calm down the situation.[SUP][6][/SUP]