Bfgrn
New member
Captain cut and paste strikes again!
Would you prefer I offer an opinion and paraphrase an official government document or provide it verbatim Captain Emote?
Captain cut and paste strikes again!
Probably a combination of the two. Obama doesn't have a clue when it comes to economics/business. So he is by nature reliant upon those around him and relies WAY too much on what is 'popular' or not with public opinion polls when making his decisions. Similar to how Carter initially went with Volcker's plan only to reverse course the second things started getting tough and public opinion shifted against him.
No way Obama (or anyone in DC) has the spine to do what is necessary to get the economy back on track in an election year. Which is why Obama puts forth 'ideas/plans' he knows the Reps won't go for and then blames them when they don't walk in lock step with his ideas and points to that as the reason he is inept in dealing with the economy.
Is there a list of subjects on which the president should follow public opinion and those on which he should not? My understanding is that it was bad for Obama to force the Affordable Care Act down our throats and that he should have catered to public opposition to it. If I understand the above correctly, Obama shouldn't cater to public opinion on the economy. Interesting.
The funny thing is that what is necessary to put the economy back on track would probably be massively popular. That's why the Republicans oppose it all.
Would you prefer I offer an opinion and paraphrase an official government document or provide it verbatim Captain Emote?
http://nymag.com/news/frank-rich/jfk-2011-11/
While I do not agree with all of his comments, this article is well worth the read. I will let you all take a gander and then for those who take the time to read the four pages, we can discuss the merits.
(the article is on the assassination of JFK and the 'hatred' towards him at the time.... and how it relates to Obama and the atmosphere today.)
Me too. He's a great writer, but I've thought his best work was behind him. I haven't read him in a while. He probably has written more of my all-time favorite books than any author though. This one sounds like something very different for him, but I think he has the talent and the knowledge to pull it off. I'm kind of excited about it now.
I have continued to read King, and this is very exciting.
And actually I really don't know about the Nixon years. Or Carter. Hard to believe Ford really was capable of riling anyone up very much.[/
Ford was considered a joke, the bungling, uncoordinated President, as depicted by Chevy Chase on Saturday night live.
Carter was seen as a good man, but weak and ineffectual.
I fear that is the road Obama is going down. When your own base perceives you that way, as they did with Carter, then you are in real trouble. People like Obama personally, as they did Cartere, but lack respect for them as President.
Clinton on the other hand was considered an immoral person, but he was seen as effective in politics.
Reagan's strength was that he was able to give the perception of being a nice guy, but when necessary he could be the tough guy, too.
Twenty four hour news was just around the corner and to me, it changed a lot in politics. A lot more of the nutcases get a forum these days.
I think that is part of what holds my fascination for the period. That said, I think you also have an element of copycat in the killings of RFK and MLK. Anyone hear NOT know the names Sirhan Sirhan or James Earl Ray?
I think we should never refer to assholes like this by name at least in the mainstream media. Its like those two assholes at Columbine. Their pictures and names plastered all over the news. Suddenly you have an uptick in school shootings. Not only does it glorify (to an extent) the assholes, but it also gives bad ideas to other nuts.
Ford was considered a joke, the bungling, uncoordinated President, as depicted by Chevy Chase on Saturday night live.
Carter was seen as a good man, but weak and ineffectual.
I fear that is the road Obama is going down. When your own base perceives you that way, as they did with Carter, then you are in real trouble. People like Obama personally, as they did Cartere, but lack respect for them as President.
Clinton on the other hand was considered an immoral person, but he was seen as effective in politics.
Reagan's strength was that he was able to give the perception of being a nice guy, but when necessary he could be the tough guy, too.
Twenty four hour news was just around the corner and to me, it changed a lot in politics. A lot more of the nutcases get a forum these days.
Oh, dear, several new books to add to my "need to read"
I was in the second grade at the time of his assassination. I remember my mother crying. I remember the impact on her, more than any other.
I don't think the nation is as naive as it was in the time of Kennedy, or maybe it it the fact that I am no longer as naive.
I worry about civil unrest growing and I do worry about the level of hate aimed at the President. Articles that suggest the likeness between Kennedy and Obama worry me, in that, some nut will draw a horrible conclusion.
Thanks it was a good article.
The Borders near my office closed down of course, and the only other book store is way down by the mall. But i was thinking that I pass Costco on my way home and I bet they will have it. I may stop tonight. Definitely by Wednesday because depending on the weather I will probably start reading this over the four day weekend ahead. It's rare for a Republican to post something that gets you excited right? Usually they are such snooze fests. I try to avoid their threads.![]()
Yeah, it's true. I wouldn't be that surprised to wake up one day and discover that webway has a show on Fox. It has helped to empower the nuts.
Yeah, it's true. I wouldn't be that surprised to wake up one day and discover that webway has a show on Fox. It has helped to empower the nuts.
I prefer you state in your own words what YOU think. Not what some author thought mere DAYS after the assassination. That you would choose something written mere days after when WE have had decades of materials on the event and countless conspiracies to sort through just shows how little you care about anything more than cutting and pasting.
I think I have written that Nixon totally crushed me. He did start troop withdrawals fron 'Nam, but the Watergate fiasco and the tapes. I was in high school and campaigned for him. Walked door to door handing out pamphlets, I was a true beleiver, a Young Republican. He was my eye opener, it is when I became a skeptic. I didn't take politicians at face value, until Obama, and then I got swept up in the tide.
Could I blame my illness and the chemo?![]()
Are you emoting that the memo is not authentic? WOW...the House Select Committee on Assassinations should be made aware of your emote!!!.
You went door-to-door for Nixon? If we were married and you hadn't disclosed this I would divorce you right now. All these years I never knew. Well, well, well...LOL
Yes you can blame that if you wish. I consider cancer to be a get-out-of-jail-free card for anything short of violence.
Just when you think you know a person.
I'll share a little secret with you.... I met Clinton when he ran for governor of AR the first time. I thought he was pretty cool.... though I was just a youngin of 7. WAY to naive to see through that charlatans line of crap.![]()