But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao...

You ain't going to make it with anyone anyhow.

The poignant verse penned by John Lennon years ago, and recorded by the Beatles in the song, Revolution, gives amazing insight into the OWS movement. How many of you were actually aware that the protesters are advocating Maoist philosophy? I bet not many, because in every interview and news report, while 'leaders' and 'followers' struggle with what exactly they hope to accomplish, they avoid mentioning it is the precise message of former Chairman Mao. Because of the brilliance and wisdom of Lennon, they realize they can't just come out and tell us they support Maoist philosophy, we would shun and ostracize them in short order... you ain't gonna make it with anyone, if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao. So they yammer around and speak in platitudes about the 1% vs. the 99%... Greedy capitalists making money off the poor... the overall inequity of wealth.

If you take some time to look up Chairman Mao Zedong, and you read about the "People's Revolution" in China, which brought Mao to power, it is uncanny the remarkable resemblance to the message of the OWS movement. Almost universally, the points are the same, and the objectives of the protests are identical. Mao believed that China's wealth must be redistributed, that the 'upper class' had gained far too much advantage over the average citizen, and that if they could just balance economic equity among the masses, it would unleash his country's greatness. Through class envy, Mao initiated this class warfare, the same as we currently see Liberals engaging in today. He and his sycophants worked the population into a frenzy, eventually overthrowing the government and paving the way for the Mao Dynasty. Oh, it was all done with the best of intentions, everyone, including John Lennon, thought Mao's ideas would work... if only they could confiscate the rich people's money and give it to the poor!

Shortly after Mao came into power, he implemented a host of anti-capitalist policy, China became isolationists, refusing to trade with capitalists or participate in the capitalist markets. Of course, this resulted in dramatically decreased trade revenues, and fostered widespread poverty across China. Mao began by closing banks and financial institutions, arresting bankers and businessmen who engaged in capitalism, executing those who breached his stringent anti-capitalist measures. When conditions in China began to worsen, and the people who had caused the revolution began to get restless, Mao kicked it up a notch, he began literally killing off the wealthy population, and confiscating their fortunes. In theory, if they killed the richest 1%, and gave the money to the 99%... things would be better economically. In practicality, it didn't work. As the central government realized the windfall from executing the rich, the people in the government became more greedy and corrupt, and the money which was supposed to filter down to the masses, never made it to them, instead, it was gobbled up by the political elite, who then controlled all the power in China.

In the end, it is estimated Mao executed 3-4 million "political prisoners" (their only crime was being wealthy.) The Maoist philosophy (same as OWS) never worked... even after sparking an all-out revolution and overthrowing the government. Still, the followers of the philosophy didn't give up, they pressed on... sparking the same revolution in Cambodia decades later, leading to the infamous reign of Pol Pot. Now... Pol Pot believed totally in Mao's philosophy, he just thought Mao implemented it incorrectly. With a few 'tweaks' he just knew the idea could work. The biggest problem Pol Pot had with Mao's implementation, is that he allowed too much time to pass before he started executing the wealthy, and he spent too much time trying to justify the killing. So Pol Pot immediately began mass executions, to get the wealth redistributed more quickly, before the government turned corrupt.... but the problem is, people who are killing folks for being wealthy, are already pretty darned corrupt to begin with. After setting the recor Pol Pot was finally stopped by Vietnam... Communist Vietnam! Yes, it became so atrocious, reprehensible and intolerable, the d for most heinous and brutal dictator in human history,other COMMIES had to intervene to stop it!

You say you want a Revolution?

Do you, really?

You say you want a Revolution?

Do you, really?

Perhaps those are the questions you should be asking the 1%.

It's truly baffling how you can submit a post and then draw an illogical conclusion. Obviously I have to dumb this WAY down.

OK. Try to follow along. We're going to play, "Connect the dots."

When conditions in China began to worsen, and the people who had caused the revolution began to get restless, Mao kicked it up a notch, he began literally killing off the wealthy population, and confiscating their fortunes...... That's dot one.

In the end, it is estimated Mao executed 3-4 million "political prisoners" (their only crime was being wealthy.) ......That's dot number two.

The biggest problem Pol Pot had with Mao's implementation, is that he allowed too much time to pass before he started executing the wealthy.....So Pol Pot immediately began mass executions, to get the wealth redistributed more quickly....That's dot number three.

OK. Now connect the dots. The wealthy refused to share so in the end their riches were taken and they were killed. Millions of them. So, I ask you, if you were wealthy would you want to wait until a revolution started? Would you want to wait until the government was overthrown? Would you want to wait until you were led to the gallows or.....?

Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it and history is replete with examples. The French Revolution, The Russian Revolution, The Chinese Revolution....

When a revolution entails the poor against the wealthy it's the wealthy who are more likely to die so, as I said in my opening remarks, perhaps those are the questions you should be asking the 1%. Do they really want to wait until a revolution starts?
 
You mean, other than documented World History, right?

Your Wiki source doesn't confirm your contentions that the Democrats and the OWS movement are Maoists, so you lose again. No wonder you are so reluctant to post links...when you do, they have no relevance to your baseless bombast and you pwn yourself.

The past few days, all you've had to offer is empty baseless insults. Like one of several trolls flooding the boards with your meaningless retorts. I really do hate to have to put you on the IA list, but if this is all you bring to the table, that will be your fate. Either straighten your ass up and start responding to threads with posts which captivate, or relegate yourself to obscurity for good. Final Warning.


:palm:

Surrendering again, pusillanimous punk?

How long will you pretend I'm 'on ignore' this time?

You lose the war of ideas again, just like your beloved slave states lost the war of emancipation.

Now, limp away and nurse your wounds, loser.

Thanks for the laughs.
 
Perhaps those are the questions you should be asking the 1%.

It's truly baffling how you can submit a post and then draw an illogical conclusion. Obviously I have to dumb this WAY down.

OK. Try to follow along. We're going to play, "Connect the dots."

When conditions in China began to worsen, and the people who had caused the revolution began to get restless, Mao kicked it up a notch, he began literally killing off the wealthy population, and confiscating their fortunes...... That's dot one.

In the end, it is estimated Mao executed 3-4 million "political prisoners" (their only crime was being wealthy.) ......That's dot number two.

The biggest problem Pol Pot had with Mao's implementation, is that he allowed too much time to pass before he started executing the wealthy.....So Pol Pot immediately began mass executions, to get the wealth redistributed more quickly....That's dot number three.

OK. Now connect the dots. The wealthy refused to share so in the end their riches were taken and they were killed. Millions of them. So, I ask you, if you were wealthy would you want to wait until a revolution started? Would you want to wait until the government was overthrown? Would you want to wait until you were led to the gallows or.....?

Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it and history is replete with examples. The French Revolution, The Russian Revolution, The Chinese Revolution....

When a revolution entails the poor against the wealthy it's the wealthy who are more likely to die so, as I said in my opening remarks, perhaps those are the questions you should be asking the 1%. Do they really want to wait until a revolution starts?

AND THE IDEOLOGY STILL DID NOT WORK!

Is there something not getting through your little fucked up head about this? They KILLED people and took their wealth, so they could redistribute it to the 99%ers, and IT FUCKING FAILED! Right now, most on your side are nowhere near as insane as you, they aren't advocating or threatening to KILL THE RICH AND TAKE THEIR MONEY! They are merely pontificating the philosophy, and claiming they want to tax rich people at a much higher rate, to achieve the Maoist goals. The problem is, the Maoist philosophy does not work, even when you KILL the rich people and confiscate their wealth!
 
LOL, dumb, defeated Dixie the doublewide dweller trots out his 'big guns'...capital letters, oversize fonts, and exclamation points.

Next he'll call someone a 'pinhead'...

Hilarious.
 
Your Wiki source doesn't confirm your contentions that the Democrats and the OWS movement are Maoists, so you lose again. No wonder you are so reluctant to post links...when you do, they have no relevance to your baseless bombast and you pwn yourself.


.........But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, you ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow.

You are expecting Maoists to tell you that's what they believe in, and as Lennon so aptly put it, you won't sell the message that way.

Research "bourgeois capitalism" in 1950s China... It's exactly the same thing as "Wall Street" with the OWS.
 
.........But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, you ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow. You are expecting Maoists to tell you that's what they believe in, and as Lennon so aptly put it, you won't sell the message that way. Research "bourgeois capitalism" in 1950s China... It's exactly the same thing as "Wall Street" with the OWS.

Prove it, punk.
 
Pinheads... Keep this in mind while you ponder your thoughts for the day... There will ALWAYS be a Top 1%! It is impossible for you to EVER make that not be a reality. The Top 1% will ALWAYS exist, and that means there will always be a lower 99%. It might be different sets of people, freedoms and opportunities may go away or be discarded, millions of people could be executed, and you will STILL, in the end, have a Top 1% and a Bottom 99%... That's simple logic and mathematics.
 
I knew Dixie the deluded doublewide dweller would reach for his ultimate weapon...'pinhead'...oh nos, now my facts have all been logically refuted...he called me a 'pinhead'.


ROFLMAO.


lame2.gif
 
AND THE IDEOLOGY STILL DID NOT WORK!

Is there something not getting through your little fucked up head about this? They KILLED people and took their wealth, so they could redistribute it to the 99%ers, and IT FUCKING FAILED! Right now, most on your side are nowhere near as insane as you, they aren't advocating or threatening to KILL THE RICH AND TAKE THEIR MONEY! They are merely pontificating the philosophy, and claiming they want to tax rich people at a much higher rate, to achieve the Maoist goals. The problem is, the Maoist philosophy does not work, even when you KILL the rich people and confiscate their wealth!

I had a feeling I didn't dumb it down enough for you. I misjudged how dumb you really are. Mea culpa.

Yes, killing the wealthy failed but the wealthy were killed, nonetheless. That is the point and from a logical viewpoint it makes more sense to share than be killed. That is the point. The current way things are going will not last. Do you not see the OWS demonstrators? Do you not see Obama trying to get social programs in place?

This nonsense about the government not being able to look after it's citizens, the garbage talk about the country on the verge of bankruptcy, is the talk of the greedy. As more and more people lose their homes, lose their jobs, slip into poverty, things are going to get worse. And it's coming. Whether Maoist philosophy works or doesn't work is immaterial. The disadvantaged, the poor, the hungry, the homeless, the jobless don't give a damn about philosophy. They see people with an abundance while they are suffering and they are going to change things.

Now, either the wealthy play along or, as history has shown, over and over, they end up with the short end of the stick. The outcome has always been the same. Either the wealthy volunteer to share or a revolution results. That's just the way it is.

Now do you understand?
 
Poor Dixie the defeated deluded doublewide dweller thinks OWS wants to 'kill" the 1%...what an ass.

Fortunately, most of the public seems way smarter than Dix:




[TD="colspan: 7"]
"Now, I'm going to read you two short descriptions of what some people are thinking these days when it comes to government and the economy. Please tell me if you strongly agree, mildly agree, feel neutral about, mildly disagree, or strongly disagree with each set of ideas.
[/TD]

[TD="width: 700, colspan: 7"][/TD]

[TD="width: 18"][/TD]
[TD="width: 673, colspan: 6"]
"The current economic structure of the country is out of balance and favors a very small proportion of the rich over the rest of the country. America needs to reduce the power of major banks and corporations and demand greater accountability and transparency. The government should not provide financial aid to corporations and should not provide tax breaks to the rich."
[/TD]



Strongly agree: 60%
Mildly agree: 16%
Neutral: 9%
Mildly disagree: 6%
Strongly disagree: 6%



NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll conducted by the polling organizations of Peter Hart (D) and Bill McInturff (R). Nov. 2-5, 2011. N=1,000 adults nationwide. Margin of error ± 3.1.
 
I had a feeling I didn't dumb it down enough for you. I misjudged how dumb you really are. Mea culpa....Now do you understand?


If you think Dix is capable of understanding anything he doesn't already fervently believe, you may as well do this:
bang3.gif
 
Wrong, liar.

The GOP has been redistributing the wealth of America from the 99% to the 1% for years now. That's the 'tax cuts for the rich' philosophy, and it has failed, just like Horny Herman.

I'm not a liberal.

You have no facts to back up your lies, as usual, and have elected to ignore mine by dubbing them 'propaganda'.

You didn't even examine the evidence I presented, did you, gutless little coward?

You won't read this, either:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-the-gop-became-the-party-of-the-rich-20111109

BTW, the Chinese are poised to overtake America as the world's leading superpower. You lose again.

You're saying that the 1% was given money from the lower 99%, as part of their breaks? :cof1:
 
"Who is most to blame for current economic problems: Wall Street bankers, George W. Bush, or Barack Obama?"

Wall Street bankers: 36%

George W. Bush: 34%

Barack Obama: 21%


NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll conducted by the polling organizations of Peter Hart (D) and Bill McInturff (R). Nov. 2-5, 2011. N=1,000 adults nationwide. Margin of error ± 3.1.

 
I had a feeling I didn't dumb it down enough for you. I misjudged how dumb you really are. Mea culpa.

Yes, killing the wealthy failed but the wealthy were killed, nonetheless. That is the point and from a logical viewpoint it makes more sense to share than be killed. That is the point. The current way things are going will not last. Do you not see the OWS demonstrators? Do you not see Obama trying to get social programs in place?

This nonsense about the government not being able to look after it's citizens, the garbage talk about the country on the verge of bankruptcy, is the talk of the greedy. As more and more people lose their homes, lose their jobs, slip into poverty, things are going to get worse. And it's coming. Whether Maoist philosophy works or doesn't work is immaterial. The disadvantaged, the poor, the hungry, the homeless, the jobless don't give a damn about philosophy. They see people with an abundance while they are suffering and they are going to change things.

Now, either the wealthy play along or, as history has shown, over and over, they end up with the short end of the stick. The outcome has always been the same. Either the wealthy volunteer to share or a revolution results. That's just the way it is.

Now do you understand?

No, I don't understand, when history has proven that taking the wealth from the rich and giving it to the poor, NEVER WORKS! It's immaterial if rich people are killed, no humans... rich, poor, or retarded like you, are willing to give up what rightfully belongs to them. And this government DOES "look after" it's citizens, probably better than any country on the face of the earth ever has... but that isn't enough for Maoists, they can't be satisfied until we attempt another ill-fated effort at wealth redistribution. Idiots like you will advocate this insanity, because you are apparently ignorant of history, and how this idea has been tried before, and what the results were.
 
LOL, Dixie the deluded doublewide dweller loves his "kill the rich" strawman....
 
Back
Top