But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao...

You ain't going to make it with anyone anyhow.

The poignant verse penned by John Lennon years ago, and recorded by the Beatles in the song, Revolution, gives amazing insight into the OWS movement. How many of you were actually aware that the protesters are advocating Maoist philosophy? I bet not many, because in every interview and news report, while 'leaders' and 'followers' struggle with what exactly they hope to accomplish, they avoid mentioning it is the precise message of former Chairman Mao. Because of the brilliance and wisdom of Lennon, they realize they can't just come out and tell us they support Maoist philosophy, we would shun and ostracize them in short order... you ain't gonna make it with anyone, if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao. So they yammer around and speak in platitudes about the 1% vs. the 99%... Greedy capitalists making money off the poor... the overall inequity of wealth.

If you take some time to look up Chairman Mao Zedong, and you read about the "People's Revolution" in China, which brought Mao to power, it is uncanny the remarkable resemblance to the message of the OWS movement. Almost universally, the points are the same, and the objectives of the protests are identical. Mao believed that China's wealth must be redistributed, that the 'upper class' had gained far too much advantage over the average citizen, and that if they could just balance economic equity among the masses, it would unleash his country's greatness. Through class envy, Mao initiated this class warfare, the same as we currently see Liberals engaging in today. He and his sycophants worked the population into a frenzy, eventually overthrowing the government and paving the way for the Mao Dynasty. Oh, it was all done with the best of intentions, everyone, including John Lennon, thought Mao's ideas would work... if only they could confiscate the rich people's money and give it to the poor!

Shortly after Mao came into power, he implemented a host of anti-capitalist policy, China became isolationists, refusing to trade with capitalists or participate in the capitalist markets. Of course, this resulted in dramatically decreased trade revenues, and fostered widespread poverty across China. Mao began by closing banks and financial institutions, arresting bankers and businessmen who engaged in capitalism, executing those who breached his stringent anti-capitalist measures. When conditions in China began to worsen, and the people who had caused the revolution began to get restless, Mao kicked it up a notch, he began literally killing off the wealthy population, and confiscating their fortunes. In theory, if they killed the richest 1%, and gave the money to the 99%... things would be better economically. In practicality, it didn't work. As the central government realized the windfall from executing the rich, the people in the government became more greedy and corrupt, and the money which was supposed to filter down to the masses, never made it to them, instead, it was gobbled up by the political elite, who then controlled all the power in China.

In the end, it is estimated Mao executed 3-4 million "political prisoners" (their only crime was being wealthy.) The Maoist philosophy (same as OWS) never worked... even after sparking an all-out revolution and overthrowing the government. Still, the followers of the philosophy didn't give up, they pressed on... sparking the same revolution in Cambodia decades later, leading to the infamous reign of Pol Pot. Now... Pol Pot believed totally in Mao's philosophy, he just thought Mao implemented it incorrectly. With a few 'tweaks' he just knew the idea could work. The biggest problem Pol Pot had with Mao's implementation, is that he allowed too much time to pass before he started executing the wealthy, and he spent too much time trying to justify the killing. So Pol Pot immediately began mass executions, to get the wealth redistributed more quickly, before the government turned corrupt.... but the problem is, people who are killing folks for being wealthy, are already pretty darned corrupt to begin with. After setting the record for most heinous and brutal dictator in human history, Pol Pot was finally stopped by Vietnam... Communist Vietnam! Yes, it became so atrocious, reprehensible and intolerable, the other COMMIES had to intervene to stop it!

You say you want a Revolution?

Do you, really?
 
John Lennon was just warning about being open about your beliefs too. Lets face it, he was a communist at heart.
 
Looks like Dixie is really pissed because the Cain Train ran off the rails....
 
"Imagine no possessions." Revolution has some appropos moments for OWS, though - "we'd all love to see the plan" and all that...

The GOP plan is more tax cuts for the rich.

OWS has correctly painted the 1% and their enablers as the cause of our nations' current woes.
 
The GOP plan is more tax cuts for the rich.

OWS has correctly painted the 1% and their enablers as the cause of our nations' current woes.

Which was the exact same sentiment of those who overthrew the Chinese government in the People's Revolution, leading the reign of Mao. Even after they got everything they wanted, implemented their stupidity to the fullest, and had full control of wealth redistribution... it still didn't work. Even after murdering millions and confiscating their wealth... still didn't work. What happened was, they got rid of the "richest 1%" completely... killed them all... and the wealth was redistributed to the political elite and their cronies. The People, whom the revolution was intended to help, actually suffered tremendously under Mao. If it's possible, they became even poorer. It would eventually take 25-30 years of capitalist reforms, to bring China back to prosperity.

The OWS (Liberals), like Mao, have a FLAWED philosophy which does NOT work, it has been proven.
 
Which was the exact same sentiment of those who overthrew the Chinese government in the People's Revolution, leading the reign of Mao. Even after they got everything they wanted, implemented their stupidity to the fullest, and had full control of wealth redistribution... it still didn't work. Even after murdering millions and confiscating their wealth... still didn't work. What happened was, they got rid of the "richest 1%" completely... killed them all... and the wealth was redistributed to the political elite and their cronies. The People, whom the revolution was intended to help, actually suffered tremendously under Mao. If it's possible, they became even poorer. It would eventually take 25-30 years of capitalist reforms, to bring China back to prosperity. The OWS (Liberals), like Mao, have a FLAWED philosophy which does NOT work, it has been proven.

Poor Dixie...embittered by the mammoth failure of his Mandingo man-love object Horny Herman, he now resorts to his usual tactics - distorting history and twisting the facts to match his Alabubba imaginary multi-millionaire "philosophy"...


The wealth redistribution in the US also went to the Party elite...in this case, the Party is the GOP and the elite are the super-rich...

http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html
 
Says Dixie while wearing a white sheet and carrying a burning cross.

It's a bit dangerous to wear flammable linen and tote a burning cross. Sounds like something up your alley.

Poor Dixie...embittered by the mammoth failure of his Mandingo man-love object Horny Herman, he now resorts to his usual tactics - distorting history and twisting the facts to match his Alabubba imaginary multi-millionaire "philosophy"...


The wealth redistribution in the US also went to the Party elite...in this case, the Party is the GOP and the elite are the super-rich...

[Propaganda link deleted]

No, the GOP is opposed to wealth redistribution, that is totally a Liberal philosophy. The thing is, it's an idea that sounds good to liberal idiots like you, but it has failed miserably and led to millions of deaths every time it has been tried, and it has never led to prosperity for the poor. Your problem is ignorance, you don't know your history, therefore, you are destined to repeat it.
 
No, the GOP is opposed to wealth redistribution, that is totally a Liberal philosophy. The thing is, it's an idea that sounds good to liberal idiots like you, but it has failed miserably and led to millions of deaths every time it has been tried, and it has never led to prosperity for the poor. Your problem is ignorance, you don't know your history, therefore, you are destined to repeat it.

Wrong, liar.

The GOP has been redistributing the wealth of America from the 99% to the 1% for years now. That's the 'tax cuts for the rich' philosophy, and it has failed, just like Horny Herman.

I'm not a liberal.

You have no facts to back up your lies, as usual, and have elected to ignore mine by dubbing them 'propaganda'.

You didn't even examine the evidence I presented, did you, gutless little coward?

You won't read this, either:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-the-gop-became-the-party-of-the-rich-20111109

BTW, the Chinese are poised to overtake America as the world's leading superpower. You lose again.
 
Is Dixie the defeated smarter than a fifth grader?

[h=3]After-Tax Income Grew More for Highest-Income Households[/h]After-tax income for the highest-income households grew more than it did for any other group. (After-tax income is income after federal taxes have been deducted and government transfers—which are payments to people through such programs as Social Security and Unemployment Insurance—have been added.)


CBO finds that, between 1979 and 2007, income grew by:
  • 275 percent for the top 1 percent of households,
  • 65 percent for the next 19 percent,
  • Just under 40 percent for the next 60 percent, and
  • 18 percent for the bottom 20 percent.
http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=12485
 
Wrong, liar.

The GOP has been redistributing the wealth of America from the 99% to the 1% for years now.

This is exactly the message which sparked the People's Revolution in China. You see, back when I was a wet-behind-the-ears punk in school, it always puzzled me why they called it "the people's revolution" ...it was confusing... the people revolted so they could be enslaved into communism and summarily executed by a tyrant leader? That didn't make any sense to me, so I began to read up on it. Interestingly enough, I found that Mao was preaching pretty much the same thing you guys are, that China's problems were related to the fact that only a few Chinese families controlled most of the wealth, and the rest could never achieve prosperity, unless something was done to rectify the inequity of wealth... a revolution.

They didn't end up just taxing rich people more, they ended up executing them and confiscating their entire wealth... but it STILL didn't work!

BTW, the Chinese are poised to overtake America as the world's leading superpower. You lose again.

Yes, you see... After Mao's reign ended in 1976, the next leaders began to undo much of his anti-capitalist measures, and re-introduce things like foreign trade, and after about 30 years, brought China back to prosperity. They are only poised to take over as the world's leading superpower because they abandoned Maoist philosophy.
 
Is Dixie the defeated smarter than a fifth grader?

[h=3]After-Tax Income Grew More for Highest-Income Households[/h]After-tax income for the highest-income households grew more than it did for any other group. (After-tax income is income after federal taxes have been deducted and government transfers—which are payments to people through such programs as Social Security and Unemployment Insurance—have been added.)


CBO finds that, between 1979 and 2007, income grew by:
  • 275 percent for the top 1 percent of households,
  • 65 percent for the next 19 percent,
  • Just under 40 percent for the next 60 percent, and
  • 18 percent for the bottom 20 percent.
http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=12485

Ah... the old conundrum... the rich get richer in a free capitalist society! Well guess what? That's exactly what is supposed to happen! People who are rich, are generally that way because they have the motivation to be successful. So it is perfectly logical these people would naturally gain more on the rest of the pack each year, as time goes by. You're complaining about something that is perfectly normal and natural, and will happen in any FREE CAPITALIST SOCIETY!
 
GOP has a lot of facist asshole like dixtard

The past few days, all you've had to offer is empty baseless insults. Like one of several trolls flooding the boards with your meaningless retorts.

I really do hate to have to put you on the IA list, but if this is all you bring to the table, that will be your fate.

Either straighten your ass up and start responding to threads with posts which captivate, or relegate yourself to obscurity for good.

Final Warning.
 
Dixie the defeated doublewide dweller has no facts to back up his assertions, as usual.

The majority of Americans know he's lying, because his GOP pets are in disrepute.


"Do you approve or disapprove of the job the Republican leaders in Congress are doing?" If "depends": "Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the job the Republican leaders in Congress are doing?"


Approve: 27%
Disapprove: 67%

The do-nothing party of the disproportionate distributors of dollars & Dixie lose again...


http://www.pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
 
Back
Top