Catholic Church protects pedophile priests but...

Bitch, please. What's hilarious is you demanding anyone to prove anything, when you haven't. The fact that there are so many of us, has nothing to do with the fact that I've been in a monogamous relationship for the past almost 10 years. How many divorces and acts of adultery have you been through in 10 years??? We don't have that long to ponder.
Debate? You have the audacity to cite the word, when you run from it, at every opportunity. And that is a public condemnation, bitch. You're the biggest cunt in here. Lowdown. Dirty. And full of shit. Now run home to your mama. Oh, I forgot...she's gone. Well, find the trash bin where she's interred and hibernate there.

Just as I predicted, you run from debate. Prove that queers make up that high a percentage. You can't you queer. You don't have the balls to debate. You don't have the brains because they must be all fucked out from boinking fag butts.
 
Just as I predicted, you run from debate. Prove that queers make up that high a percentage. You can't you queer. You don't have the balls to debate. You don't have the brains because they must be all fucked out from boinking fag butts.

Ok, I asked a serious question concerning the source of your information. If you are going to blast people for not debating, then you really should be prepared to actually debate.

You claimed homosexuals only make up 1% to 2% of the population. Cite your source.
 
I'd say anyone who is in a 5% or less of any particular category is statistically deviant, yes. TEA Party members are a much higher percentage than to be considered abnormal, or deviant.
well, if being outside of that 5% is 'normal', and I see what goes for normal these days, i'll happily be a deviant.
 
Just as I predicted, you run from debate. Prove that queers make up that high a percentage. You can't you queer. You don't have the balls to debate. You don't have the brains because they must be all fucked out from boinking fag butts.

When your ass produces a document, a link, a source (unbiased)...only then, can you demand that others produce it. You stupid bitch. You couldn't debate a sixth grader.
Board, make a note...the impotent DY is calling me out on "debate", no less.
 
Oh look, one attempt to debate in months, if not years, and you fall flat on your flat face. I'll bet I'm higher up in my chosen sport than you are in yours, and in the present time, you butt-sniffing wrestler. :D[/QUOTE I could care less about grampaw skiing, ass fucking your slut wife is my sport
 
When your ass produces a document, a link, a source (unbiased)...only then, can you demand that others produce it. You stupid bitch. You couldn't debate a sixth grader.
Board, make a note...the impotent DY is calling me out on "debate", no less.

I'll produce a link. You'll attack the source. Will you produce a link? If so I'll attack its merit. :D
 
I'll produce a link. You'll attack the source. Will you produce a link? If so I'll attack its merit. :D

Never ask that for which you are unwilling or unable to do. Move on. Sources are important. Can your evidence be corroborated? Doubtful.

And that's a lame excuse for not doing so. Produce sources that can't be challenged. Simple.
 
I could care less about grampaw skiing, ass fucking your slut wife is my sport
Dude you can't even use the quote button properly. Since my wife's ass is a virgin and you have never been in the same State as her you haven't done so well in your chosen sport.

Come on, big time wrestler. Show us how you rank nationally. :lol:
 
Back
Top