Dixie, you sure have been quiet about the meltdown of your canidate Cain... Whatsup?

LOL at the blind faith exhibited by Dix....



Now we find out that Horny Herman AKA Flipper thinks sexual harrassment is a "joke"....



"an exchange between Mr. Cain and a supporter was caught on tape by a Fox News camera at a campaign stop in Kalamazoo, Mich. It first aired Thursday night on the network’s “Special Report” program. According to the video, a person in the crowd mentioned Ms. Hill to Mr. Cain, who responded, jokingly, “Is she going to endorse me?”...




http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/10/cain-caught-on-tape-joking-about-anita-hill/
 
Dixie said:
I believe the original story, the woman who filed a complaint 14 yrs ago with the NRA, who remains anonymous, was 'leaked' by the Perry camp. Liberal reporters digging and probing, found the second and third women, and the fourth woman is a ringer tossed in by David Axelrod and the Democrats. Make no mistake, this has been a tag-team effort on part of Democrats and establishment Republicans, both of whom FEAR Herman Cain.
Click to expand...

So it was "leaked". So people were digging and probing. So what? That's what is supposed to happen when someone runs for President.

In today's world a criminal check and a credit check are done when hiring a janitor!
 
Why are the Pubs ashamed to admit they support a groper?




443228239.jpg
 
\(\(())/)/ said:
Why are the Pubs ashamed to admit they support a groper?




443228239.jpg
Click to expand...

I was under the impression a few were supporting him. Comments referring to Dems making up stories. Digging up dirt on the ladies who were groped. Racist innuendos about people trying to destroy a black man who became successful.

But I may be mistaken.
 
People like Dixie don't care if Horny Herman is guilty or not, do they?


443228239.jpg
 
\(\(())/)/ said:
People like Dixie don't care if Horny Herman is guilty or not, do they?


443228239.jpg
Click to expand...

What is he supposed to be guilty of? No formal charge has ever been made by anyone. In order for there to be any question of guilt or innocence, we must first have the charge of some crime, don't we? Well, in this case we don't. Herman Cain is a black conservative, so innuendo and conjecture are just as good as a formal charge, right? In fact, we can go ahead and condemn the man and convict him, because he is black and conservative, so we know he must be guilty of something, right?

Why don't you shut the fuck up with your outright slander and high tech lynching of the man, and stop trying to condemn him on speculation? It's not me who doesn't care if he is guilty, it is YOU who doesn't care if he is innocent and the allegations are baseless.
 
Would you care if he is found to be guilty of sexual harrassment?



443228239.jpg





At Wednesday’s GOP debate, Cain expressed his frustration with Obamacare, lamenting that alternate healthcare legislation never made its way past Speaker Pelosi—or as he quipped, “Princess Nancy.”

Ignore the fact that the term “princess” is only socially acceptable for those with the last name Middletonhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...a-shot-with-newly-single-pippa-middleton.html; instead, note how long Cain stood by the joke, even, according to the New York Times, tweeting it from his official account (the tweet has since been deleted).

Cain did eventually apologize for the remark, saying that it was “a statement that I probably should not have made.”

But when reporters asked him why he felt the need to retract the comment, he said, “So you all could stop asking me about it, okay?”

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...hill-joke-and-more-cringe-worthy-moments.html
 
Dixie said:
HE HAS NOT BEEN CHARGED WITH SEXUAL HARASSMENT! I MIGHT CARE, IF HE HAD BEEN CHARGED, BUT HE HASN'T! DO YOU CARE THAT HE HASN'T BEEN CHARGED?
Click to expand...

Would you care if he is found to be guilty of sexual harrassment?


toles11012011.jpg
 
Dixie said:
Hey dumbass, big bold red letters above, I answered your retardedly dumb question. You didn't answer mine.
Click to expand...


Would you care if he is found to be guilty of sexual harrassment?



443228239.jpg







When Sarah Palin wrote Herman Cain off as a "flavor of the week," Herman Cain balked.

He took to The Tonight Show on September 30 to let Jay Leno know that he’s not just a temporary candidate: he’s more substantial, like Häagen-Dazs’ Black Walnut.

Maybe Herman Cain hasn’t done his grocery shopping in a while, but according to a spokesperson from Häagen-Dazs’, the Black Walnut flavor was discontinued two years ago.

However, the flavor did enjoy a four year term from 2005 to 2009.

If only Herman should be so lucky.http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...hill-joke-and-more-cringe-worthy-moments.html
 
Herman Cain's problems over what to do with his hands remind me of that old gospel favorite: "He's got the whole world in his hands."


Then again, that analogy isn't fair, since we don't know for certain if Cain even got his hands out of his suit pockets.


Still, two women — the latest, Karen Kraushaar, a communications official at the Treasury Department — have had the guts to come forward in person to say that the Republican presidential candidate did or said something inappropriate to them.


Along with the two who have complained in person, two other unidentified women have complained about Cain's hands-on approach.


Word is, the guy used to be a big-shot pizza executive. Hah. I'm starting to wonder if he really came from the phone company, since its motto used to be "reach out and touch someone."


Sharon Bialek, Cain's other identified accuser, says she feels for Cain's wife, Gloria.


Meanwhile Cain was allegedly feeling for everybody else.


Oh, the tangled webs we weave.


Bialek says her trouble started after she'd gone to dinner with Cain to ask him to help her find a job.


She says that after dinner while in the car, Cain tried to put her in a position, all right, but not the kind she was looking for.


Cain's defense? He says he didn't even know Bialek and doesn't remember her whatsoever.


What's with the presidential candidates' memory lapses all of a sudden? What is this? GOP'zheimers? Gov. Rick "Oops" Perry can't remember all three of the federal departments he wants to ax, although I guess he gets a D+ since he managed to come up with two. And Cain can't remember who was on his dance card.


In Cain's defense, he points out that his wife said that none of Bialek's accusations sounds like anything he'd ever do. No big surprise there, huh?


But if there is some truth to these allegations, what's the fix?


What's my advice to Cain and other men seeking power when it comes to unwanted advances with women?


Simple: If you're reaching for the top, don't reach for the bottom.




http://www.statesman.com/news/nation/herman-cain-has-feelings-for-everybody-1965511.html
 
\(\(())/)/ said:
Herman Cain's problems over what to do with his hands remind me of that old gospel favorite: "He's got the whole world in his hands."


Then again, that analogy isn't fair, since we don't know for certain if Cain even got his hands out of his suit pockets.


Still, two women — the latest, Karen Kraushaar, a communications official at the Treasury Department — have had the guts to come forward in person to say that the Republican presidential candidate did or said something inappropriate to them.


Along with the two who have complained in person, two other unidentified women have complained about Cain's hands-on approach.


Word is, the guy used to be a big-shot pizza executive. Hah. I'm starting to wonder if he really came from the phone company, since its motto used to be "reach out and touch someone."


Sharon Bialek, Cain's other identified accuser, says she feels for Cain's wife, Gloria.


Meanwhile Cain was allegedly feeling for everybody else.


Oh, the tangled webs we weave.


Bialek says her trouble started after she'd gone to dinner with Cain to ask him to help her find a job.


She says that after dinner while in the car, Cain tried to put her in a position, all right, but not the kind she was looking for.


Cain's defense? He says he didn't even know Bialek and doesn't remember her whatsoever.


What's with the presidential candidates' memory lapses all of a sudden? What is this? GOP'zheimers? Gov. Rick "Oops" Perry can't remember all three of the federal departments he wants to ax, although I guess he gets a D+ since he managed to come up with two. And Cain can't remember who was on his dance card.


In Cain's defense, he points out that his wife said that none of Bialek's accusations sounds like anything he'd ever do. No big surprise there, huh?


But if there is some truth to these allegations, what's the fix?


What's my advice to Cain and other men seeking power when it comes to unwanted advances with women?


Simple: If you're reaching for the top, don't reach for the bottom.


http://www.statesman.com/news/nation/herman-cain-has-feelings-for-everybody-1965511.html
Click to expand...


If you're reaching for the top, don't reach for the bottom.


:rofl:

Wiser words have never been written.
 
Dixie said:
Not true. There was the account of Arkansas State Troopers who worked for him when he was governor, Clinton was a bona fide horndog, and in his case, most of the allegations were true.. he even had a special assistant assigned to bimbo eruptions.. that's all they did! Keeping evidence from coming out, became a Clinton trademark, long before he ever gained national prominence... we really don't want to compare Cain and Clinton.

Bitch #4, Cain says he has never met, doesn't know who she is.. doesn't remember her. The woman lives in Chicago, in the same building as David Axelrod... small fucking world, eh?

I actually think this helps Cain, because there will be a backlash. This has turned into the Gloria Alred Show, and most intelligent voters are going to be real turned off by this before it's over. Cain is currently tied with Romney, according to Gallup today... I like his odds.
Click to expand...

Funny what a difference a few days makes.
 
Dixie said:
Nah, we won't have to wait for this to unfold, we'll know long before August. I give it a few weeks, and it will die a silent death, or become such an obvious publicity train wreck, the libbies will be spinning it all back onto republicans again. Cain has solid support, and they are energized by this, because they believe in the integrity of the man. He simply didn't get to where he is today, by abusing or disrespecting women, and accusations of the sort are baseless and unfounded. You want to play this out to the angle that Cain is guilty, ala Anthony Weiner.. but that's not going to be the case here. Cain says he didn't do anything inappropriate, and his supporters believe him. That's ultimately all that matters at this point.
Click to expand...

It did not take a few weeks....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top