New study finds climate sensitivity much less than IPCC AR4 estimates

T

tinfoil

Banned
Just like I have said, CO2 forcing has been overstated by about 30% because there are unknown natural forcings that we (climate scientists) have attributed to anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions.

http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2011/11/08/a-new-lower-estimate-of-climate-sensitivity/


http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/09/climate-sensitivity-lowering-the-ipcc-fat-tail/
WUWT also covered this earlier this week, but the link to the pdf file is broken. The author must have removed the file due to excessive traffic.
 
Not going away.

IPCC AR5 will not be able to keep the "6 degrees C warming with a doubling of CO2" predictions that have been the basis of the alarmism.

I see the warmers have no comment
 
"green" is the next bubble. Our market is a series of bubbles created by insiders. The truth doesnt matter to them.
 
tinfoil said:
Not going away.

IPCC AR5 will not be able to keep the "6 degrees C warming with a doubling of CO2" predictions that have been the basis of the alarmism.

I see the warmers have no comment
Click to expand...

I will respond for them.....

1) Consensus!!!
2) you science denier
3) Consensus!!!
4) This report has no merit because it wasn't written by one of us.... therefore it is invalid.
5) Consensus!!!
 
Tinny's weekly thread calling out "warmers."

Tinny - would you care to identify who you're calling out? I honestly can't remember the last time I saw someone on here arguing AGW.
 
Onceler said:
Tinny's weekly thread calling out "warmers."

Tinny - would you care to identify who you're calling out? I honestly can't remember the last time I saw someone on here arguing AGW.
Click to expand...

Mott and BGRN probably. There's an ongoing feud. It's hysterically funny and if you haven't been following it you should. I read a lot of threads here that I never comment on just for the laughs. I love, absolutely love, when the pissing contests between the emo men really get going. Onceler, you can't miss it!
 
Darla said:
Mott and BGRN probably. There's an ongoing feud. It's hysterically funny and if you haven't been following it you should. I read a lot of threads here that I never comment on just for the laughs. I love, absolutely love, when the pissing contests between the emo men really get going. Onceler, you can't miss it!
Click to expand...

I have missed that! I didn't realize we still had warmers. Loved the oral sex conversation, btw...
 
Onceler said:
Tinny's weekly thread calling out "warmers."

Tinny - would you care to identify who you're calling out? I honestly can't remember the last time I saw someone on here arguing AGW.
Click to expand...

Mott, Bfgrn are the only two fear mongers I can think of off hand who still argue the consensus bullshit.
 
LMAO I totally knew guys, but it was Onceler and I couldn't resist. That's why i answered the way that I did. Besides, their pots don't need stirring they are all the auto-stir models!
 
So then, we all agree the climate team scientists working for the IPCC are using statisical methods that create the alarming unprecedented rate of warming and using bad logic to assign the so-called unprecedented warming to anthropogenic carbon emissions? Good to know we, the deniers, won the debate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top